Reactions about 'Official stance on how ...' - Page 4

Reactions about 'Official stance on how ...'

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Argh
Posts: 10920
Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38

Re: Reactions about 'Official stance on how ...'

Post by Argh »

OK... tested that, and it looks like if I wipe it, then I can make it read an all-SDD set. So... breaking it up is theoretically practical (although... meh, if deleting ArchiveCache is something ordinary users might need to do on a regular basis, that needs to be something in SpringSettings or the Lobby clients, imo).

I'll get on that here in a bit.

Will it sync like this, though? Or am I going to have to zip everything up and change the modinfos whenever I go do testing runs?

I mean... meh, it's like 6 files at this point (AntiCheat, SafeWidgets, P.U.R.E., WB, two "mutators" that actually load P.U.R.E., made P.U.R.E. core a type 2, etc.), so there's lots of dependency crap I could screw up. It'd become 7, maybe 8, if the content is made separate. Not saying that's un-doable, just... icky. Complexity is the bane of speed.
User avatar
CarRepairer
Cursed Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3359
Joined: 07 Nov 2007, 21:48

Re: Reactions about 'Official stance on how ...'

Post by CarRepairer »

Update: acquiring maps, mods, mutators and ------- sinks is no longer a pain for the end user. It is now seamless.
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Re: Reactions about 'Official stance on how ...'

Post by Forboding Angel »

Do I need to start an extremely flamey political thread to put out the gpl fires?
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”