The Guardian should be renamed
Moderator: Content Developer
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Dragon's Maw isn't cavedog either, and he said turrets. As in, static D. As in, not the Pyro.
- Blue_Falcon
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
It isn't? What then? O.oPxtl wrote:Dragon's Maw isn't cavedog either
- Blue_Falcon
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Thanks, but that doesn't answer my quesiton.TradeMark wrote:learn2modinfo http://modinfo.adune.nl/index.php?act=b ... ssic_ta_56
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
do you really need to know who made it...
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Three pages to respond to a simple statement - the Guardian should be renamed.
Somebody rename it, or not, and close this thread.
Somebody rename it, or not, and close this thread.
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
We are apes... what did you expect
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
it should be renamed so that noobs realize its a punishment to build it
rename it to punisher!
sorry was that too punish
rename it to punisher!
sorry was that too punish
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Pxtl wrote:You sure you're not thinking of the Immolator? But that was L1. Iirc, that's the only real unit that was totally gutted out of AA/BA. Would be nice to see it back, considering that Arm has more selection for L1 kbots.Blue_Falcon wrote:Well... I have a copy of OTA+CC+BT (Maybe BT?).
The CORE has an immobile turret called the Firestorm, built by (all??) T2 constructors.
Look up I mentioned the immolater.
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
lolhunterw wrote:it should be renamed so that noobs realize its a punishment to build it
rename it to punisher!
sorry was that too punish
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
sometimes I read forum archives and go "wow that makes a lot of sense that's a smart poster" and then I realize it was mehunterw wrote:lolhunterw wrote:it should be renamed so that noobs realize its a punishment to build it
rename it to punisher!
sorry was that too punish
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
you win the threadhunterw wrote:lolhunterw wrote:it should be renamed so that noobs realize its a punishment to build it
rename it to punisher!
sorry was that too punish
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Ya know, if you're going to be a rabid TA fan (I fall into this category), at least have the decency to know what units were in TA, CC, BT (now, fuck me if I'm wrong, but unless I'm horribly mistaken, BT only had maps and missions, not units -- I had it, but didn't really do anything with the bt stuff tbh) and for download by cavedog.
The lack of knowledge of original Cavedog units in Spring displeases me.
*stern face*
The lack of knowledge of original Cavedog units in Spring displeases me.
*stern face*
Uninstall TAUCP or TAUIP or whatever the hell it's called, and find out.Blue_Falcon wrote:It isn't? What then? O.oPxtl wrote:Dragon's Maw isn't cavedog either
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Battle Tactics for OTA actually came with four units:
Arm Stunner / Core Neutron (EMP Missile)
Arm Phalanx / Core Copperhead (Mobile Flak Vehicles)
Battle Tactics was mostly mission-based (100 new missions), with weird missions emphasizing unusual gameplay. Like, "the enemy has porced up on this steep cliff, so you should use spiders to attack them" sort of thing.
Core Contingency had 12 new missions for each side, and a mission called "Krogoth Encounter", which is basically as it sounds. 75 new units were added; mostly seaplanes, amphibious units, and "Naval-Series" floating defenses. Oh yeah, and Vulcan/Buzzsaw.
/played a TON of TA back in the day
//The original was much more porcy than our current BA
///Couldn't Dgun a Krog back in the day
Arm Stunner / Core Neutron (EMP Missile)
Arm Phalanx / Core Copperhead (Mobile Flak Vehicles)
Battle Tactics was mostly mission-based (100 new missions), with weird missions emphasizing unusual gameplay. Like, "the enemy has porced up on this steep cliff, so you should use spiders to attack them" sort of thing.
Core Contingency had 12 new missions for each side, and a mission called "Krogoth Encounter", which is basically as it sounds. 75 new units were added; mostly seaplanes, amphibious units, and "Naval-Series" floating defenses. Oh yeah, and Vulcan/Buzzsaw.
/played a TON of TA back in the day
//The original was much more porcy than our current BA
///Couldn't Dgun a Krog back in the day
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
what is being played now in the OTA multiplayer lobby is much porcier than BA...
in fact BA is not porcy at all which is why people only enjoy it when they over crowed a map.
in fact BA is not porcy at all which is why people only enjoy it when they over crowed a map.
Last edited by Gota on 14 Jan 2010, 17:23, edited 1 time in total.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
BT may have included those, but they were available via the website before BT came out.Mav wrote: Arm Stunner / Core Neutron (EMP Missile)
Arm Phalanx / Core Copperhead (Mobile Flak Vehicles)
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
change Guardian -> Molester
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Why not just change it's mouseover description to say "Static siege artillery and shore battery"?
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
Guardian -> DuckFicker
Re: The Guardian should be renamed
guardian is so dumb, i think it should be called tribulex