three lies in a single post for a moderator nice one !neddiedrow wrote:Memory hog, process hog, failure to start multiple releases on 32 bit Windows, 199X UI.
edit: proof
Moderators: Moderators, Lobby Developers
three lies in a single post for a moderator nice one !neddiedrow wrote:Memory hog, process hog, failure to start multiple releases on 32 bit Windows, 199X UI.
Code: Select all
[00:01:16] <SL_bot> percentage of SpringLobby users: 0.833467
[00:01:16] <SL_bot> absolute number of SpringLobby users: 18688
[00:01:16] <SL_bot> total number of users: 22422
[00:01:16] <SL_bot> session stats:
[00:01:17] <SL_bot> 359612 all sessions (100.000000)
[00:01:17] <SL_bot> 74452 other sessions (20.703425)
[00:01:17] <SL_bot> 285160 SpringLobby sessions (79.296575)
[00:01:17] <SL_bot> 1692 updates since 2010-01-06 00:01:29.609484
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 1 sl users on
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 12334 sl users on MicrosoftWindowsNT
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 15 sl users on AppleMacOSX
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 0 sl users on unknown
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 7 sl users on FreeBSD
[00:01:18] <SL_bot> 6331 sl users on Linux
as you notice SL_Bot stats only refer to SL itself with stats reporting enabled, rest 17% includes lobby bots, telnet, SL users with stats reporting turned off, tasclient, etcAF wrote:Now why cant we have an official stats page with all this that doesnt rely upon the assumption of the only being 2 pieces of software interacting with the server
actually it has more players, the above stats include the casual players logging in once in a while, when i do my daily stats (while im logged in) tasclient is used by 27% of all users (including bots), so if you remove bots and linux users tasclient is used by maybe 40% of non casual windows spring players), but the stats are done in 8-12 hours with only 700-800 usersLicho wrote:Its amazing tasclient still has above 15% considering only SL is default checked in installer for over a year.
Moreover, TASClient has been voluntary smashed down in installer description. It has also been kept out of date in installer for some reason I wouldn't comment.Licho wrote:Its amazing tasclient still has above 15% considering only SL is default checked in installer for over a year.
wtf does that mean ?neddiedrow wrote:I said no lies, those points sum up my experience with TASClient, which I stopped trying to use about three months ago. I'm entirely willing to revise them at another point, but judging from your screenshot, the last point remains true, the second to last is probably local, and the other two are neither supported nor refuted.