Orcone - Page 3

Orcone

Classic game design, maintained to please you...

Moderator: Content Developer

User avatar
Blue_Falcon
Posts: 155
Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54

Re: Orcone

Post by Blue_Falcon »

Umm... Was there any sarcasm there? O.o

And I just meant to point out the coincidence that you posted exactly one month after the precedent poster.
User avatar
Tired
Posts: 302
Joined: 14 Nov 2005, 07:19

Re: Orcone

Post by Tired »

If you feel a need to apologize "just in case" you sound offensive, then you sound offensive.

The point wasn't worth posting now any more than it has been in the last three years, but not really any less, since new players are always asking old questions. The Orcone question that began this thread is three years old as well.

If you have to ask if there was sarcasm in a statement, then there was sarcasm in a statement; I'd say well deserved.
User avatar
Blue_Falcon
Posts: 155
Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54

Re: Orcone

Post by Blue_Falcon »

O.o Is that a flame? :P
User avatar
Tired
Posts: 302
Joined: 14 Nov 2005, 07:19

Re: Orcone

Post by Tired »

If you have to ask if something is a flame....

More a matter of instruction. Can a teacher be said to "flame" a child when instructing them to behave? "Urmom," "nazi," and "troll" didn't appear, so let's say not.
User avatar
Blue_Falcon
Posts: 155
Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54

Re: Orcone

Post by Blue_Falcon »

I was joking.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Orcone

Post by TradeMark »

wtf is happening here
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: Orcone

Post by Neddie »

Tired is happening.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Orcone

Post by Gota »

I'm not sure but i think BA needs to add the Orcone unit.
User avatar
TheFatController
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 1177
Joined: 10 Dec 2006, 18:46

Re: Orcone

Post by TheFatController »

Gota wrote:I'm not sure but i think BA needs to add the Orcone unit.
/cheat
/give 1 armorco
User avatar
Blue_Falcon
Posts: 155
Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:54

Re: Orcone

Post by Blue_Falcon »

REALLY!!!?

Wow, I didn't know the unit was still included. Thanks :)
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Orcone

Post by TradeMark »

i dont think we should add orcone in BA
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Re: Orcone

Post by Pxtl »

TradeMark wrote:i never liked orcone... it looked fugly

i want krogtaar back :< why? core doesnt have "cheap" t3 mech that isnt a walking nuclear bomb.
What's wrong with the Shiva?
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Orcone

Post by TradeMark »

shiva... thats not really t3, more like goliath in kbot format, and its not even nearly as cool as krogtaar is.

shiva sucks... only 8500 HP

while bantha has 62000 HP

...

krogtaar should be like bantha, but witohut nuke explosion and with only half of the HP
User avatar
Mav
Posts: 258
Joined: 12 Nov 2009, 20:06

Re: Orcone

Post by Mav »

TradeMark wrote:shiva... thats not really t3, more like goliath in kbot format, and its not even nearly as cool as krogtaar is.

shiva sucks... only 8500 HP

while bantha has 62000 HP

...

krogtaar should be like bantha, but witohut nuke explosion and with only half of the HP
Most users will agree that Core has the upper hand once you get to full-blown T2 battles. (Yes, I know that is an extremely general statement). It really doesn't affect the balance that Arm has the Bantha while core doesn't have an equivalent. Besides, I've always believed that if you HAVE to have T3 to win, you screwed up your game somewhere along the way :wink:
User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: Orcone

Post by JohannesH »

Ehh Shivas are much better than a bantha
mar3moset
Posts: 24
Joined: 12 Nov 2009, 21:04

Re: Orcone

Post by mar3moset »

TradeMark wrote:shiva... thats not really t3, more like goliath in kbot format, and its not even nearly as cool as krogtaar is.

shiva sucks... only 8500 HP

while bantha has 62000 HP

...

krogtaar should be like bantha, but witohut nuke explosion and with only half of the HP
Shivas do have alot of range to them because of the rocket, also their ARM counter part is pretty shitty compared to them since Shivas are supposed to amphibious anyways.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Orcone

Post by TradeMark »

bantha is amphibious too, bantha has same rocket too... and laser... and more weapons... cant compare really

t3 should be armored units, less than 20k HP shouldnt be called t3...

lol even sumo has 14k HP and its t2...tho its quite slow

--

one bantha can blow up like 20 shivas alone, and its explosion will finalize the annihilation...
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Orcone

Post by Jazcash »

Stumpy should be T3.
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: Orcone

Post by Tribulex »

ill make a stumpy that shoot stumpy for t3.
User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: Orcone

Post by JohannesH »

jeffy gantry, that makes jeffies like they were before nerf
Post Reply

Return to “Balanced Annihilation”