
But also, as Bana said, the facial expressions were a dead giveaway there.
Id rather vote for no PMs allowed for villagers.
Moderator: Moderators
Good idea.CarRepairer wrote:I dislike honor system games where I have to rely on the integrity of others not to cheat. It is likely that most of the people around here are good and nice and want a fun game, but we can never be sure that if we set some rules like no PM that some people would violate them for an advantage and we'd never know. Better to eliminate rules like that.
Suggestion: When posting the final list of players, add a few understudies at the end, then request that each player and understudy post in the thread one more time with a "here" or something to be sure that they aren't dead. Missing players can be replaced instantly and the game can commence knowing that people who said "I'm in" a week ago aren't gone now.
Dunno, system is still cheatable, even more easily, provided that felix does the same group pm thing as last time.SwiftSpear wrote:Good idea.CarRepairer wrote:I dislike honor system games where I have to rely on the integrity of others not to cheat. It is likely that most of the people around here are good and nice and want a fun game, but we can never be sure that if we set some rules like no PM that some people would violate them for an advantage and we'd never know. Better to eliminate rules like that.
Suggestion: When posting the final list of players, add a few understudies at the end, then request that each player and understudy post in the thread one more time with a "here" or something to be sure that they aren't dead. Missing players can be replaced instantly and the game can commence knowing that people who said "I'm in" a week ago aren't gone now.
Understudies are decided before the game, they don't get a role if all the players show up. Understudies would be decided by order of posts in the first thread. It's basically "waiting list" players.Beherith wrote:Dunno, system is still cheatable, even more easily, provided that felix does the same group pm thing as last time.SwiftSpear wrote:Good idea.CarRepairer wrote:I dislike honor system games where I have to rely on the integrity of others not to cheat. It is likely that most of the people around here are good and nice and want a fun game, but we can never be sure that if we set some rules like no PM that some people would violate them for an advantage and we'd never know. Better to eliminate rules like that.
Suggestion: When posting the final list of players, add a few understudies at the end, then request that each player and understudy post in the thread one more time with a "here" or something to be sure that they aren't dead. Missing players can be replaced instantly and the game can commence knowing that people who said "I'm in" a week ago aren't gone now.
He's a wolf!Spawn_Retard wrote:game is going to shit, because no one can stop bawwing about rules being so narrow. Jesus, people need to stop over thinking things.