[old] Balanced Annihilation V6.81 - Page 3

[old] Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Classic game design, maintained to please you...

Moderator: Content Developer

User avatar
Beherith
Posts: 5145
Joined: 26 Oct 2007, 16:21

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Beherith »

I totally agree with shield nerf, as it was annoying beyond anything to amphib raid enemy with 20 crocs, just to find that they cant shoot at anything cause the shields deflect all their shots immediatly and without losing efficiency. Also shields could deflect an epoch firing from 3 cannons. Thats hardly sensible now is it?
User avatar
adin_panther
Posts: 164
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by adin_panther »

Dragoon wrote:
- Arm Annihilator damage raised 5000->9000, Beamtime raised 0.3->1.5.
- Arm Annihilator hp raised 3000->5500.
Beamtime from .3 to 1.5? and 9000 dmg!!?!?!?!?! What?

The annihilator has just gone from pitifully underpowered to outrageously overpowered.


I don't see why it would do twice the damage if it fires the exact same weapon as the Penetrator and the Doomsday.
The penetrator is less expensive and the doomsday has more then one weapon ... with the upgraded beamtime the annihilator finally has the chance to destroy a few units in one shot.
Gertkane
Posts: 156
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 16:10

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Gertkane »

The additional HLT laser the doomsday has is hardly effective against t2 assaults. Now compared to the Anni, doomsday is quite useless.
imbaczek
Posts: 3629
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 16:19

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by imbaczek »

the new anni doesn't have sweepfire it seems, so no killing 9000 flashes in one shot.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Gota »

Heh,did nobody notice the fact t2 plasma cannons are crazy good now?
Their dps was multiplied by almost 1.5!!better start pumping them out now...we have a new main t2 defensive structure(also you will see less of the pitbulls and vipers since their build time was increased by 25%...that's a huge nerf).
and why the HUGE reduction in chainsaw dps?reload time increased by 60%....that means a reduction of 60% in dps...was it unbelievably over powered before to get such a drastic nerf?
User avatar
adin_panther
Posts: 164
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by adin_panther »

imbaczek wrote:the new anni doesn't have sweepfire it seems, so no killing 9000 flashes in one shot.
Aw :(
User avatar
adin_panther
Posts: 164
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by adin_panther »

Gertkane wrote:The additional HLT laser the doomsday has is hardly effective against t2 assaults. Now compared to the Anni, doomsday is quite useless.
Not against t2, maybe, but you'd be suprised how many players use t1 till the end of the game.
Gertkane
Posts: 156
Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 16:10

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Gertkane »

adin_panther wrote:
Gertkane wrote:The additional HLT laser the doomsday has is hardly effective against t2 assaults. Now compared to the Anni, doomsday is quite useless.
Not against t2, maybe, but you'd be suprised how many players use t1 till the end of the game.
True, but against T1 you can just build 5 vipers which sort the trouble much better or 2 gollies and which will make sure that nothing T1 will get through.
User avatar
adin_panther
Posts: 164
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by adin_panther »

While that is true, an Annihilator would die much quicker against t1, then a doomsday.
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Regret »

Gota wrote:was it unbelievably over powered before to get such a drastic nerf?
Yes.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Gota »

well from its 6.6 stats in moddb its gonna go back to being fail now.
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by lurker »

Gota wrote:and why the HUGE reduction in chainsaw dps?reload time increased by 60%....that means a reduction of 60% in dps...was it unbelievably over powered before to get such a drastic nerf?
  • Reload time increased 60%
  • Reload time is 1.60 times as much
  • The unit fires 1 / 1.60 = .625 times as many shots
  • The unit does .625 times as much damage
  • The unit does 1 - .625 = .375 times less of its original damage
    (hey look, .375 is also how many meters in an elmo)
  • The unit does .375 * 100% = 37.5% less of its original damage
  • The unit has been nerfed 37.5%
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by BaNa »

Give anni back sweeping attack, it should be the sweeping BLADE OF DOOM
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by Gota »

lurker wrote:
Gota wrote:and why the HUGE reduction in chainsaw dps?reload time increased by 60%....that means a reduction of 60% in dps...was it unbelievably over powered before to get such a drastic nerf?
  • Reload time increased 60%
  • Reload time is 1.60 times as much
  • The unit fires 1 / 1.60 = .625 times as many shots
  • The unit does .625 times as much damage
  • The unit does 1 - .625 = .375 times less of its original damage
    (hey look, .375 is also how many meters in an elmo)
  • The unit does .375 * 100% = 37.5% less of its original damage
  • The unit has been nerfed 37.5%
yeah your right that was hasty of me but even with only 40% nerf for such a high energy and build time and metal ratios it will still be bad.
missile towers will be much better.
A good thing for BA t1 air play would be to make missile towers less effecient since t1 air is really very weak.
For t2 its the other way around..a static AA buff is needed.
The micro costs of playing late game ground and late game air are uncomparable plus the sucky static AA makes so many games end with just bomber spams..
Last edited by Gota on 24 Jan 2009, 16:30, edited 1 time in total.
[Krogoth86]
Posts: 1176
Joined: 23 Aug 2007, 19:46

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by [Krogoth86] »

To those bawing about the 9000 Anni-damage:
As BA still seems to use the default intensity setting Spring delivers, it will deal just 4500 at max range anyway and 9000 only if you put your units next to it...
bwansy
Posts: 385
Joined: 02 May 2006, 05:21

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by bwansy »

imbaczek wrote:it's wrong when one building can counter several more expensive ones, don't you think?
So... the antinuke should cost as much as a few nuke silos? :lol:
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by lurker »

Antinuke shouldn't be able to handle more than a couple simultaneous nuke strikes. Which I don't believe it can.
User avatar
TheFatController
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 1177
Joined: 10 Dec 2006, 18:46

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by TheFatController »

lurker wrote:
Gota wrote:and why the HUGE reduction in chainsaw dps?reload time increased by 60%....that means a reduction of 60% in dps...was it unbelievably over powered before to get such a drastic nerf?
  • Reload time increased 60%
  • Reload time is 1.60 times as much
  • The unit fires 1 / 1.60 = .625 times as many shots
  • The unit does .625 times as much damage
  • The unit does 1 - .625 = .375 times less of its original damage
    (hey look, .375 is also how many meters in an elmo)
  • The unit does .375 * 100% = 37.5% less of its original damage
  • The unit has been nerfed 37.5%
Also this is not the same as reducing its damage by 37.5% either, cause it still does 100% of its damage on the first round (ie when planes fly in) it just does less constant damage which is what flak is for...
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by BaNa »

I like the t1 and t2 kbots being amphibs and being built in the amphib lab. T2 aa kbots are raep v air, so its nice that amphibs got some heavy hitters.
eyu100
Posts: 182
Joined: 05 Jul 2008, 04:10

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.81

Post by eyu100 »

If you aren't stalling, how many antinukes will be built in the time it takes to build 1 nuke?
Post Reply

Return to “Balanced Annihilation”