You don't agree that the average player skill decreased?Regret wrote:The point was that you're a dumb clueless noob and should shut up.Gota wrote:I didn't understand your post or the point you were making TBH.
limit player number to 8-10 per game.
Moderator: Moderators
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
False.Gota wrote: Smaller games will mean better cooperation between players,more chances of newbies learning things from better players and maybe the revival of some sort of competitive sub community?
There is little co-operation between players in any game. The only co-operation happens when you get 2+ clan players, or people that know the score, most players just play for themselves.
Larger games mean a newbie (or a person that isn't great) doesn't have as much of an effect on the game. If you play 4v4, and you have just 1 newbie, then there's gonna be a newbie shaped hole in 1/4 of your frontline, and there's nothing you can do about it because as soon as you start spreading your defences they weaken.
I do agree that 8v8 (DSD) can be a little restrictive because there are no effective tactics apart from techrush/porc and bertha/plane spam or commbomb.
But that's only because the map is too narrow for 8v8.
Limiting to 8 players is not a good idea though.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
YHCIR wrote:False.Gota wrote: Smaller games will mean better cooperation between players,more chances of newbies learning things from better players and maybe the revival of some sort of competitive sub community?
There is little co-operation between players in any game. The only co-operation happens when you get 2+ clan players, or people that know the score, most players just play for themselves.
Larger games mean a newbie (or a person that isn't great) doesn't have as much of an effect on the game. If you play 4v4, and you have just 1 newbie, then there's gonna be a newbie shaped hole in 1/4 of your frontline, and there's nothing you can do about it because as soon as you start spreading your defences they weaken.
I do agree that 8v8 (DSD) can be a little restrictive because there are no effective tactics apart from techrush/porc and bertha/plane spam or commbomb.
But that's only because the map is too narrow for 8v8.
Limiting to 8 players is not a good idea though.
Cooperation rises with decreasing player amounts.
And you just made a very good point...if you play a 4v4
and a noob is failing there will be more pressure on him to improve and more pressure on good players to teach others and help them.
- Spawn_Retard
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
i do agree that average player skill has lowerd, but thats because theres a lot more people playing spring now. This happens with every game that gets popular, the player skill level will drop with the increase of populairty.
My point is this:
If you freeze out a section of gameplay, you will lose the section that that was created from that feature. which is like what, 100+ players?
Good bye player base, hello skill level.
My point is this:
If you freeze out a section of gameplay, you will lose the section that that was created from that feature. which is like what, 100+ players?
Good bye player base, hello skill level.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
Are you saying players will move to play other RTS with higher than 10 cap??name one please..
I don't think anyone will leave cause of it.
The average skill player dropped but also the raw number of good players,while the number of overall players rose(if overall player numbers rise the raw number of good players should rise as well but instead it decreased!).
EDITED --
I have never heard anyone saying he is playing spring cause the cap of players is 16.
I have never heard players posting how unbelievable it is the cap is at 16..and noobs joining do not expect there to be a cap of 16...
I don't think anyone will leave cause of it.
The average skill player dropped but also the raw number of good players,while the number of overall players rose(if overall player numbers rise the raw number of good players should rise as well but instead it decreased!).
EDITED --
I have never heard anyone saying he is playing spring cause the cap of players is 16.
I have never heard players posting how unbelievable it is the cap is at 16..and noobs joining do not expect there to be a cap of 16...
Last edited by Gota on 19 Jan 2009, 11:52, edited 1 time in total.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
No, people will just not allow newbies in their 4v4 games, and newbies will not want to play 4v4 games because losing sucks.Gota wrote: Cooperation rises with decreasing player amounts.
And you just made a very good point...if you play a 4v4
and a noob is failing there will be more pressure on him to improve and more pressure on good players to teach others and help them.
You get good at spring by watching others and by playing lots of games. You can't teach someone how to play well in the middle of a game, it takes ages to learn. It just makes people frustrated.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
If that was true we would see a huge rise of player numbers never before seen in spring after the cap was raised but we didn't.YHCIR wrote:No, people will just not allow newbies in their 4v4 games, and newbies will not want to play 4v4 games because losing sucks.Gota wrote: Cooperation rises with decreasing player amounts.
And you just made a very good point...if you play a 4v4
and a noob is failing there will be more pressure on him to improve and more pressure on good players to teach others and help them.
You get good at spring by watching others and by playing lots of games. You can't teach someone how to play well in the middle of a game, it takes ages to learn. It just makes people frustrated.
Less players DOES mean better cooperation and the fact your losing makes you learn.
Smaller games are much better for a player to learn how to play right...the are less random less chaotic and each player is more accentuated.
8v8 noobfests teach nothing and don't encourage people to improve.
Oh and noobs played fine with advanced players before the cap was 16...sure there was a bit more pressure on them but it was good and overall just encouraged people to get better.
There will always be people screaming at noobs and getting mad in any community
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
You're saying that potential players would be magically drawn to spring just because one setting was changed? How do these potential players find out that spring exists?Gota wrote:If that was true we would see a huge rise of player numbers never before seen in spring after the cap was raised but we didn't.YHCIR wrote:No, people will just not allow newbies in their 4v4 games, and newbies will not want to play 4v4 games because losing sucks.Gota wrote: Cooperation rises with decreasing player amounts.
And you just made a very good point...if you play a 4v4
and a noob is failing there will be more pressure on him to improve and more pressure on good players to teach others and help them.
You get good at spring by watching others and by playing lots of games. You can't teach someone how to play well in the middle of a game, it takes ages to learn. It just makes people frustrated.
Also, who cares about "improving players", yeh it would be good to have people that understand the game better, but it's not something that should be forced. As long as there are other autohosts playing different maps/mods, some people will migrate to different style games (different maps/fewer players) when they are bored of DSD.
- Spawn_Retard
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
This is also true, 4v4s are usualy off limits to anyone below star rank.YHCIR wrote:
No, people will just not allow newbies in their 4v4 games, and newbies will not want to play 4v4 games because losing sucks.
You get good at spring by watching others and by playing lots of games. You can't teach someone how to play well in the middle of a game, it takes ages to learn. It just makes people frustrated.
And to address GOTAs comments on putting more pressure on a noob to play better is not in anyway a good thing. I dislike playing 4v4s for this reason alone, if games were less competetive as the amount of players decreased id certainlyn play them a whole lot more. I'm sure a lot of people have the same opinion and arn't that confident when defending their pride and skill level on spring. Psychological intimadation can and will effect a games outcome, if your deemed a noob and cant play, you will be less likely to come back and play the game again. I'm glad there are noobs, because it's more people i can teach to play spring, and makes the game fun to play, and not stressfull.
Also,m GJ GOTA, you failed again.
Losing =/= increasing your skill level.
Watching replays and actually learning strats from oldern players is how you increase your skill level.
Thatn is why i am creating commentated games with the help of others in the community.
If you'd like to join in on it, please do, i've always wanted to hear you speak for real GOTA, and maybe have a proper conversation about things.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
Magically drown to spring?how do you understand that from what I'm writing?
I was saying that a 10 player cap is fine and is a good number and that smaller games will make players play better not have more players...the amount of players has got nothing to do with player cap as long as its on a normal number..
No noob will expect more than 8 or 10.
I was saying that a 10 player cap is fine and is a good number and that smaller games will make players play better not have more players...the amount of players has got nothing to do with player cap as long as its on a normal number..
No noob will expect more than 8 or 10.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
Gota wrote: If that was true we would see a huge rise of player numbers never before seen in spring after the cap was raised but we didn't.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
I hope your replays help though i doubt they will(unfortunately)unless they are directed intentionally to create a tutorial and than integrated into a mod or a tutorial mod etc..Spawn_Retard wrote:This is also true, 4v4s are usualy off limits to anyone below star rank.YHCIR wrote:
No, people will just not allow newbies in their 4v4 games, and newbies will not want to play 4v4 games because losing sucks.
You get good at spring by watching others and by playing lots of games. You can't teach someone how to play well in the middle of a game, it takes ages to learn. It just makes people frustrated.
And to address GOTAs comments on putting more pressure on a noob to play better is not in anyway a good thing. I dislike playing 4v4s for this reason alone, if games were less competetive as the amount of players decreased id certainlyn play them a whole lot more. I'm sure a lot of people have the same opinion and arn't that confident when defending their pride and skill level on spring. Psychological intimadation can and will effect a games outcome, if your deemed a noob and cant play, you will be less likely to come back and play the game again. I'm glad there are noobs, because it's more people i can teach to play spring, and makes the game fun to play, and not stressfull.
Also,m GJ GOTA, you failed again.
Losing =/= increasing your skill level.
Watching replays and actually learning strats from oldern players is how you increase your skill level.
Thatn is why i am creating commentated games with the help of others in the community.
If you'd like to join in on it, please do, i've always wanted to hear you speak for real GOTA, and maybe have a proper conversation about things.
AS i have written before the cap was lower and noobs played fine with advanced players..
There is little incentive to learn if you can jsut go play a 8v8 where nobody cares how you play..
Last edited by Gota on 19 Jan 2009, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
?YHCIR wrote:Gota wrote: If that was true we would see a huge rise of player numbers never before seen in spring after the cap was raised but we didn't.
We didn't.
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
Yes but we don't care, this idea is so stupid, let people play 8v8 dsd if they want to.Gota wrote:Did you read what i posted?
Re: limit player number to 8 per game.
What do you think is stupid about it?Hoi wrote:Yes but we don't care, this idea is so stupid, let people play 8v8 dsd if they want to.Gota wrote:Did you read what i posted?
Re: limit player number to 8-10 per game.

Tada!
Adding major game constraints to the engine to suit your personal tastes as a player is ridiculous...particularly when the functionality is already implemented!
Re: limit player number to 8-10 per game.
This.Peet wrote:
Tada!
Adding major game constraints to the engine to suit your personal tastes as a player is ridiculous...particularly when the functionality is already implemented!
Re: limit player number to 8-10 per game.
Sigh...Read posts?Peet wrote:
Tada!
Adding major game constraints to the engine to suit your personal tastes as a player is ridiculous...particularly when the functionality is already implemented!
I didn't say change the engine and i explained why just allowing to cap player numbers for a room is not enough.
Re: limit player number to 8-10 per game.
In any case, you're attempting to push your personal preference for a configurable option on everybody. I like dynamic water...does that mean it should be forced on by the settings app?
Re: limit player number to 8-10 per game.
I just want players to be encouraged to play better and not worse like it is now,by reducing the maximum player number per game.