Make rankings optional? - Page 3

Make rankings optional?

Please use this forum to set up matches and discuss played games.

Moderator: Moderators

Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Regret »

Gota wrote:mindless points or speculations as much as you want.
Facts:

More people banned = Less people playing, more drama about bans and more retards taking revenge, more people learning how to use proxies

Enforcing a rule of this scale = A lot more work for moderators

Inability to be 100% sure about someone breaking this rule = False positive bans
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

Are you a moderator?NO.
so dont speak for them.

Making email verification cant hurt at all.It can only make smurfing that much harder whic his good.
It will act as a stabilizing factor in the registration making people think twice before running and making new users.
Like i said this needs to be added as an announcement on thelobby and forums that smurfing is bannable and than start from small punishments and go on from there.
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Regret »

Gota wrote:Are you a moderator?NO.
so dont speak for them.
You dont agree it would be a lot more work for moderators if they had to enforce banning of every single smurf caught, checking accusations of smurfing and so on and on?
Making email verification cant hurt at all.It can only make smurfing that much harder whic his good.
OOOOH WHATS THIS
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Peet »

Regret wrote:Facts:

More people banned = Less people playing, more drama about bans and more retards taking revenge, more people learning how to use proxies

Enforcing a rule of this scale = A lot more work for moderators

Inability to be 100% sure about someone breaking this rule = False positive bans
Gota wrote:Are you a moderator?NO.
so dont speak for them.
This is both common sense and a recap of the points we have made.
Like i said this needs to be added as an announcement on thelobby and forums that smurfing is bannable and than start from small punishments and go on from there.
We should announce and enforce a rule that does not exist?
User avatar
[TS]Lollocide
Posts: 324
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 18:24

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by [TS]Lollocide »

Here's an idea, if you make it to higher ranks on other accounts, you get a password type deal that allows you to create new accounts with ranks you have already achieved.

Since nobody except afew care about smurfing, why not make it so if people really do want to do it, they can atleast show they know their Flashes from their Penetrators.
User avatar
Tribulexrenamed
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:06

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Tribulexrenamed »

Wombat wrote:hi Tribulex still hate me ? :D
GET BACK TO WORK SLAVE. I WANT THOSE PEWEES SPITSHINED.

Thats a really bad idea, now I can make not 1 vet star account, but 23452345987698237465 vet star accounts. I mean, its a great idea, but I would undoubtly exploit it quite severely, and that is what makes it so great/bad.
[LBF]Vache
Posts: 24
Joined: 01 Apr 2008, 22:56

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by [LBF]Vache »

Tribulex wrote:
Wombat wrote:hi Tribulex still hate me ? :D
GET BACK TO WORK SLAVE. I WANT THOSE PEWEES SPITSHINED.

Thats a really bad idea, now I can make not 1 vet star account, but 23452345987698237465 vet star accounts. I mean, its a great idea, but I would undoubtly exploit it quite severely, and that is what makes it so great/bad.
i lolled

btw, stop the drama. I'm totally with Regret here. Anyone playing a little bit seriously just knows smurfing isn't more an issue than anything else on Spring. It just brings out some social issues
(like dicks crying about smurfing because they lost a teamgame(I'm not talking about you Wisse =) ). But every now and then, a skillfull player plays like shit, or a gold noob ruins a game, and the problem disappears into a bigger one ===>

1. You have no way to ensure that a game is gonna be balanced.
2. People don't like to loose
3. Moreso, when they do, they're likely to say it's some other people's fault.

I mean , i have ruined some games, everyone going for a comnap/bomb/hunt game for lolz did, or because someone annoyed you. Whatever, making smurfs the problem is so easy and so wrong ...
User avatar
Sucky_Lord
Posts: 531
Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Sucky_Lord »

Doesnt it just piss you off when ur hosting with, lets say, a min rank of 4, and you get sum lvl 1 newbie joining. You ask kindly that they could leave or spec because of the min rank, and they refuse. After turning on min-rank auto kicking, and having them try to join around a thousand times with the same message-
[9:51:29 AM] * [SUX]Sucky_Lord *** Rank limit auto-kick ***
[9:51:29 AM] * [SUX]Sucky_Lord kicked (newb) from battle
[9:51:29 AM] * (newb) has left battle
- you would think they get the idea, right? But no; Instead you are flamed for 15 minutes by somebody on the other side of the world screaming at you that they are a smurf and they are actually lvl 5 and know the game.
That's not the point, I tell them. You will totally screw up the balance, and if you want to join, use your old account, as the only real reason for smurfing is to go back to lvl 1, and the only reason for that, as i see it, is to gain an unfair balance in the teams on your side.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

Conclusion:make smurfing a punishable offence in the lobby.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Hoi »

nah
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Regret »

Gota wrote:Conclusion:make smurfing a punishable offence in the lobby.
Image
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

you googled a pic just for me?
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Regret »

Gota wrote:you googled a pic just for me?
It's increasingly hard to express how dumb you are.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

Cause its really dumb to implement something all commercial game lobbies have.
yeah.
they must be dumber than me than.
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Pressure Line »

Gota wrote:Conclusion:make smurfing a punishable offence in the lobby.
you do realise that you would be the first person who got ipbanned.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Peet »

Just FWIW, he's hardly the only person who smurfs. I have >150 :P
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Pressure Line »

yeah, but you're a moderator, you can do whatever the hell you want as long as you could conceivably justify it.

"I want to play games etc without people knowing I'm a moderator." Is perfectly fine by me.

"No-one listens to me and everyone thinks I'm an epic douchebag." is not a reason to create a smurf account, neither is "everyone else is doing it."

Do you know how many accounts I have? One. (and one account from a LOOONG time ago that i forgot the un/pass for) And you know what? I have never felt the urge to go create dozens of one-stripe accounts and pretend I'm not me.

Imo, smurfing is born out of the "If I'm not winning, I'm not having fun" mentality, coupled with the Internet Fuckwad Theory meaning people don't feel they should have to be accountable for their actions.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

Most people have tons of smurfs get over yourself.
Stop addressing me personally and think of the big picture you small minded fail.
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by BaNa »

Pressure Line wrote: "I want to play games etc without people knowing I'm a moderator." Is perfectly fine by me.

"No-one listens to me and everyone thinks I'm an epic douchebag." is not a reason to create a smurf account, neither is "everyone else is doing it."
Look man, your getting it wrong. It doesn't matter what you think, okay? Noone fucking cares. You are not the judge of all things right or wrong to tell us what we should or shouldn't do.
Do you know how many accounts I have? One. (and one account from a LOOONG time ago that i forgot the un/pass for) And you know what? I have never felt the urge to go create dozens of one-stripe accounts and pretend I'm not me.
Congratulations, you are an epic example to us all. We bow in honor of your integrity and awesomeness. If only we could grow up to be such prime examples of superhuman win.
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Pressure Line »

what the fuck dude? im not saying "omg you have to do what i say."

all im saying is "In MY OPINION there are few good reasons to smurf."

I mean really... Why do people smurf? Whats there to gain? I am genuinely curious, maybe im missing out on something? There have been a few people posting who have mentioned what i would consider 'good' reasons to smurf (dev/mod anonymity for ex) but Id like to know why the people who smurf do it.
Locked

Return to “Ingame Community”