Core outro video unit guess

[Otherside]

it is a can no doubt about it

[bwansy]

It's been bugging me since the first time I saw it about 8 years ago: isn't it a bad idea to dgun another comm?

[Otherside]

what u mean bad idea its a common part of spring *A gameplay (except for in CA coms r dgun immune)

[Pxtl]

what u mean bad idea its a common part of spring *A gameplay (except for in CA coms r dgun immune)

???

Umm, in OTA and almost every other TA mod, dgunning another comm ensures the death of your own because of the massive comm-death-explosion.

Which would be a particularly bad idea if you had the enemy on the run and at the brink of death.

[Otherside]

depends on how u do it if u atlas a com and com bomb each other it could resort in dgunning each other

[Forboding Angel]

In that case the Gimp (or was that downloaded too?).

[Zpock]

Gimp is from the expansion.

[SwiftSpear]

what u mean bad idea its a common part of spring *A gameplay (except for in CA coms r dgun immune)

CA has absolutely zero relevance to a video about TA from the TA campaign. FFS, the comms only became Dgun immune in CA like 3 months ago.

[Otherside]

still a common part of spring gameplay

k ill use another example comes are immune in supreme commander

[Zpock]

It's kinda funny that the core campaign ends with a combomb.

[bwansy]

what u mean bad idea its a common part of spring *A gameplay (except for in CA coms r dgun immune)

1. That video is from OTA, not Spring.
2. Spring is a game engine, not a game. You can't dgun a comm in FF, E&E, Gundam, Eternal Struggle, EvolutionRTS, Spring 1944, you name it.

[Otherside]

Spring *A gameplay << read it

i said nothing about spring as a game/engine watever dont need to explain myself ;P

[SwiftSpear]

It has absolutely nothing to do with spring! It's a video of the TA Campaign ending. Spring is not TA, no spring mod is TA, supcom is not TA. In TA it's a bad idea to Dgun another comm, it's completely and utterly irrelevant of how good or bad an idea it is in any other game ever, because in TA it's a bad idea, and that video is ONLY relevant to TA.

It's not a fan video or something... that's the actual video that played at the end of the game.

[bwansy]

1. That video is from OTA, not Spring.

What Swiftspear said. I've been talking about OTA, why would someone mention Spring in the first place?

[Day]

because he's batshit retarded?

[Peet]

When I dgunned the other com in WC3, there were 10 minutes of shiny but cheap-looking effects and then I won the campaign.

[Otherside]

sheesh people here over react im talking about gameplay so what if i mentioned spring seriously u say i troll ?? every post about my post is a troll

[Peet]

Oh, gameplay...when I dgunned the ED player's flash rush in e2160 it gave me a strategic advantage which let me build mexes all over the map.

[Otherside]

luls at moderators complaing about trolling and doing it themselves

anywayz staying on topic

that deffo is a can but i think the size proportions are a bit off looks huge (sumo sized) but that could be because its in a bad camera angle

[Zpock]

It's the ingame proportions that are a bit adjusted to fit in the footprints while in the cinematics they can just scale it to whatever looks best. Imagine if they would make a cinematic showing a battleship and a tank, the battleship could easily be made much larger in the cinematics then the downscaled version you see ingame for practical reasons.

I noticed there is actually a second The Can in the movie, in the center at a longer distance so it's also hard to be sure especially with the crappy video quality, but the movement is definitely can-like.