Why are we arguing about mods?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
If CA and BA people didnt argue in #main about which mod was better than CA and BA people would argue in #main about who had bigger breasts and what they did with them inside each others arses.
I for one welcome the arguments as relief from a tired and vile train of thought.
I for one welcome the arguments as relief from a tired and vile train of thought.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Breasts... inside... arses?
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Lurk moar lurkrar.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Topic = 'Lets argue more about mods'
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Dont worry it wont be long before theyre arguing about wether BA or CA peewee manboobs are bigger and what the peewees do with them inside eachothers arses.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
I don't think any Spring mod has boobies...
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
(space reserved for picture of every TA unit with boobs drawn on)
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
KDR_11k wrote:I don't think any Spring mod has boobies...
lolimod!
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Lolis don't have boobies, that's why they're called lolis!
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
why do people argue about mods???
Cause it's tradition; anything less wouldn't be the Spring community.
Cause it's tradition; anything less wouldn't be the Spring community.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Because there's choice! (more than one mod)
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Drop dead.Vadi wrote:The winner is judged by popularity.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
The player base with the lowest average IQ wins.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
That's a mean way of phasing it 

- CarRepairer
- Cursed Zero-K Developer
- Posts: 3359
- Joined: 07 Nov 2007, 21:48
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Each side of the debate has a large group people who are genuinely here for a good time. Most BA/CA players just want to play the game they like, might pitch in their two cents about why they like one over the other in healthy spirited debate. But there will always be small portions of any group that become hateful and petty for no reason other than they are jerks. Then that sparks people from the other side who would not otherwise be defensive to be jerks too. I'm a CA person and there are those who like CA whom I just wish would disappear from spring (hint: rhymes with botherside) because they don't help our case in the least.
Remember folks, the spring server has not reached a limit of the amount of simultaneous battles it can host. A game of mod X doesn't mean your game of mod Y has lost an opportunity to exist. The more games that are played the better for everyone because that means more people are there to potentially play other games.
And this applies to the topic debate: Maybe it's true that the rules were unfairly bent to favor CA in order to display those words after the CAdownloader link and that's a good case against having it. But I would like to say that by removing the words "also the only way to get CA mod" you saved a few measly words in the topic but now you have hurt the entire spring community by reducing potential CA players. As Licho said, many people were always asking how to get the CA mod and it was necessary that they know they need the downloader. New players who would have otherwise stayed on spring just for CA will now be lost. Think about it. The rules should be there to help the community, and changed if they hurt it.
Remember folks, the spring server has not reached a limit of the amount of simultaneous battles it can host. A game of mod X doesn't mean your game of mod Y has lost an opportunity to exist. The more games that are played the better for everyone because that means more people are there to potentially play other games.
And this applies to the topic debate: Maybe it's true that the rules were unfairly bent to favor CA in order to display those words after the CAdownloader link and that's a good case against having it. But I would like to say that by removing the words "also the only way to get CA mod" you saved a few measly words in the topic but now you have hurt the entire spring community by reducing potential CA players. As Licho said, many people were always asking how to get the CA mod and it was necessary that they know they need the downloader. New players who would have otherwise stayed on spring just for CA will now be lost. Think about it. The rules should be there to help the community, and changed if they hurt it.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
I meant regularly, I've tried all Non-TA mods. I don't say it to make myself "look good" where did that idea come from...?Felix the Cat wrote:So in other words you play a small segment of mods but like to say that you play lots of mods in order to make yourself look good?SiN wrote: I play pretty much every mod, although I don't play many Non-TA based mods.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
You're right.
We should all play S44.
We should all play S44.
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
Agreed.FLOZi wrote:You're right.
We should all play S44.
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
but the guys are so tiny 

- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Why are we arguing about mods?
FLOZi wrote:You're right.
We should all play S44.
S44 and Evolution! Motion Carried!