I can't read that thread very easy because it appears half has been deleted and warned, which would appear to be the appropriate action.Warlord Zsinj wrote:Dare I say that there is a perfect example going on right this moment that could and should be dealt with by moderators?
I certainly wait eagerly to see what will happen now that these long-whinded morals can be put to the test. A pat on the wrist?
... Or does a repeat offender deserve worse?
Recent Forum Discussions & Locked Threads
Moderator: Moderators
My work, and I apologize for any offense caused.tombom wrote:I can't read that thread very easy because it appears half has been deleted and warned, which would appear to be the appropriate action.Warlord Zsinj wrote:Dare I say that there is a perfect example going on right this moment that could and should be dealt with by moderators?
I certainly wait eagerly to see what will happen now that these long-whinded morals can be put to the test. A pat on the wrist?
... Or does a repeat offender deserve worse?
One example I can think of is me and Vista.
I have made my opinion of Vista clear and I think its alright. I'm not a fanboy because I'm aware it has its problems, and I would not reccomend that anybody buy it unless its free or extremely cheap on offer($10 or less),
Yet despite this I have been attacked over it. My attempts to report this are dismissed out of hand as me having a thin skin or the trollers attempting to start discussion through tactless means.
What a load of nonsense.
Please explain why they seem to follow me and only me with this.
Explain why they're starting the same discussion over and over again?(duh it is not a discussion they're trying to start)
Explain why they mention it in threads that I haven't even posted in or doesn't have any prior mentions of Vista?
So basically if the victim is deemed as thin skinned or paranoid then the attacker has immunity.
If the problem can be fobbed off as an attempt to start discussion then that si what will happen.
Did I mention that the people with the Vista stuff seem to be the same people every single time?
What about stealth trolling via the edit button? Basically its OK to troll as long as you edit the post once the victim has seen it so it cant be reported. I reported caydr for doing this but because he edited the post his bad behaviour was overlooked. Apparently if you hide bad behaviour from a moderator after you've done it it never happened even if the moderators become aware of it,
This is not about strengthening forum rules.
Our rules are not being enforced, and moderators are letting trolls get away with murder through loopholes. They're failing to address the biggest problems, and the community regularly takes any discussion fo this and turns it into the usual "should we have Nazi moderators or cuddly bears? Are forum goers just thin skinned?" which derails the process completely.
And no this is not something that the forum as a whole is subject to. This is a small group who have persistently done this for years. They've been operating in the same way for years. They've used the same methods and patterns tog et the same results for years. And they've always derailed these sorts of threads by switching the topic for years. Moderation has ignored them for years, They fail to acknowledge the pattern that generates 80% of all moderatable offenses. The cycles that cause 90% of all e-drama within the spring community.
I have made my opinion of Vista clear and I think its alright. I'm not a fanboy because I'm aware it has its problems, and I would not reccomend that anybody buy it unless its free or extremely cheap on offer($10 or less),
Yet despite this I have been attacked over it. My attempts to report this are dismissed out of hand as me having a thin skin or the trollers attempting to start discussion through tactless means.
What a load of nonsense.
Please explain why they seem to follow me and only me with this.
Explain why they're starting the same discussion over and over again?(duh it is not a discussion they're trying to start)
Explain why they mention it in threads that I haven't even posted in or doesn't have any prior mentions of Vista?
So basically if the victim is deemed as thin skinned or paranoid then the attacker has immunity.
If the problem can be fobbed off as an attempt to start discussion then that si what will happen.
Did I mention that the people with the Vista stuff seem to be the same people every single time?
What about stealth trolling via the edit button? Basically its OK to troll as long as you edit the post once the victim has seen it so it cant be reported. I reported caydr for doing this but because he edited the post his bad behaviour was overlooked. Apparently if you hide bad behaviour from a moderator after you've done it it never happened even if the moderators become aware of it,
This is not about strengthening forum rules.
Our rules are not being enforced, and moderators are letting trolls get away with murder through loopholes. They're failing to address the biggest problems, and the community regularly takes any discussion fo this and turns it into the usual "should we have Nazi moderators or cuddly bears? Are forum goers just thin skinned?" which derails the process completely.
And no this is not something that the forum as a whole is subject to. This is a small group who have persistently done this for years. They've been operating in the same way for years. They've used the same methods and patterns tog et the same results for years. And they've always derailed these sorts of threads by switching the topic for years. Moderation has ignored them for years, They fail to acknowledge the pattern that generates 80% of all moderatable offenses. The cycles that cause 90% of all e-drama within the spring community.
- clericvash
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05
As far as i am aware someone disabled posts showing if a post has been edited too.
test
test
Last edited by clericvash on 28 Sep 2007, 12:22, edited 1 time in total.
- clericvash
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05
- clericvash
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 26 Sep 2007, 07:16
The phrase that comes to mind is:
"The IQ of a group is the square root of the average of it's members"
A healthy dose of the carrot and the stick, some common sense moderating (Think educational establishments - an ideal would be one moderator for every twenty users, and when you're getting to one to fifty you're in trouble) and it'll all be right as rain.
Good luck. This forum isn't nearly as bad as some I can mention, so I'm sure with a little work it'll be spiffy.
"The IQ of a group is the square root of the average of it's members"
A healthy dose of the carrot and the stick, some common sense moderating (Think educational establishments - an ideal would be one moderator for every twenty users, and when you're getting to one to fifty you're in trouble) and it'll all be right as rain.
Good luck. This forum isn't nearly as bad as some I can mention, so I'm sure with a little work it'll be spiffy.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
I agree with the latter one. There are many people who'd just like to see others banned from the forums.Felix the Cat wrote:This is exactly why we CANNOT allow one hyper-sensitive person to dictate our forum policies.AF wrote:blah blah blah
If AF had his way, everyone who posted in disagreement with him would be labeled "troll" and banhammered.
What people really should do is to look up the meaning of forum ~_~
Really, the problem is that the posts we're writing need to have a character limit. As it currently is, the person with the most time on their hands is the one that wins/resurrects/fuels an argument. A lot of people make extremely large posts on this forum that consist of absolutely nothing.
If you need to inform people in an article-like fashion, then write it in the wiki. However, giant ass diatribes and speeches do little good besides show that you're opinions are strong and that you don't take the criticism of other's well.
If you need to inform people in an article-like fashion, then write it in the wiki. However, giant ass diatribes and speeches do little good besides show that you're opinions are strong and that you don't take the criticism of other's well.
-
- Imperial Winter Developer
- Posts: 3742
- Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 08:59
I think a character limit puts a hard limit on the assumed intelligence of posters here, which is a really big shame. It also assumes that all information can be gotten across in small bites of information, which I disagree with.
That being said, I know exactly what you mean about the long whinded diatribes that mean absolutely nothing and could be summed up far more simply. I'm pretty sure I've done a few in my time
.
That being said, I know exactly what you mean about the long whinded diatribes that mean absolutely nothing and could be summed up far more simply. I'm pretty sure I've done a few in my time

- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
No, no we're not. Editing an inappropriate post is not stealth trolling, it's not exploiting a loophole in forum rules, it's realizing something you said is inappropriate and fixing it before a moderator has to do it for you. I still warned caydr during that discussion, but FFS, I'm not going to ban him for rescinding an inappropriate statement, especially considering that that thread was his first offense, and you have a LONG history of taking offense to EVERYTHING.AF wrote:Our rules are not being enforced, and moderators are letting trolls get away with murder through loopholes.
There ARE no loopholes. I ban people who I see posting with malicious intent, and I warn people who I see doing inappropriate things unintentionally. It really doesn't take much time to evaluate which is which.
An analogy!!!
Imagine a big big field with people on it.
People rise and dip like baloons with them getting higher as they troll, and theres a big cloud in the sky with moderators and big lightning rods to strike anyone who rises past a big red line.
In theory this seems ok, no loopholes.. err...
What the moderators on the cloud don't realize is the trolls have learnt that crossing the red line doesn't work the way they like it. So they're taking non trolls and swinging them around like catapults and flinging them above the line so they can watch moderators strike them down.
However all moderator discussion seems to ignore this cycle and instead pretend that what I actually mean is that people are getting above the red line in stealth aircraft or the red line should be lowered. Nonsense! I'm not asking for stricter rules! I'm asking for an end to the repetitive cycle that has been the driving force behind the vast majority fo trollign and e-drama in this community since it began.
At the very least I'm asking that the cycle is acknowledged by a moderator even if they cant do anything about it, rather than replacing any mention of it with a demand for stricter rules or Nazi moderation.
Imagine a big big field with people on it.
People rise and dip like baloons with them getting higher as they troll, and theres a big cloud in the sky with moderators and big lightning rods to strike anyone who rises past a big red line.
In theory this seems ok, no loopholes.. err...
What the moderators on the cloud don't realize is the trolls have learnt that crossing the red line doesn't work the way they like it. So they're taking non trolls and swinging them around like catapults and flinging them above the line so they can watch moderators strike them down.
However all moderator discussion seems to ignore this cycle and instead pretend that what I actually mean is that people are getting above the red line in stealth aircraft or the red line should be lowered. Nonsense! I'm not asking for stricter rules! I'm asking for an end to the repetitive cycle that has been the driving force behind the vast majority fo trollign and e-drama in this community since it began.
At the very least I'm asking that the cycle is acknowledged by a moderator even if they cant do anything about it, rather than replacing any mention of it with a demand for stricter rules or Nazi moderation.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
- clericvash
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05
Heres the exact kind of post that pisses me off:
http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=12140
Look for "Satirik" post.
What the hell, there was no need to even post in there, that id the wank that needs moderation. I'm so fedup of this forum.
http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=12140
Look for "Satirik" post.
What the hell, there was no need to even post in there, that id the wank that needs moderation. I'm so fedup of this forum.