replace lineage
Moderator: Moderators
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
replace lineage
commander ends ruins teamgames when half the frontline combusts because you had a stupid noob on your team, but im so damn sick of people just making a lab and combombing, although in sure "ith a legitimath thratergy"
would it be possible to replace it or add a further option to force spectate upon commander death, effectively leaving nobody in control of your units so someone has to .take them. this way, lamers just get hoofed out the game once they combomb, but without leaving the whole team crippled
would it be possible to replace it or add a further option to force spectate upon commander death, effectively leaving nobody in control of your units so someone has to .take them. this way, lamers just get hoofed out the game once they combomb, but without leaving the whole team crippled
I'm all for ivory_king idea.
When you loose your commander, you spectate and you're units stay on the battlefield.
If all the players of a team are spectating (no more commander), they loose.
When you loose your commander, you spectate and you're units stay on the battlefield.
If all the players of a team are spectating (no more commander), they loose.
Last edited by Torrasque on 13 Sep 2007, 13:20, edited 1 time in total.
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Linage is supposed to be comm ends the fair way. IE, all your units blow up. If anything linage is more strict than normal comm ends. Personally I think linage should take the place of the current comm ends system, and if a third system is kept it should be the system described here. SpecNoComm players.
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24