New yardmap type

[Caydr]

I'd like a new kind of yardmap type, something that allows you to designate areas that cannot be built in, but are not actually occupied.

So for instance, I could do something like the petronas towers, where a certain area is passable.

Something like, for instance:

ooxxoo
ooxxoo

Where "x" means passable, but not buildable. I could build a whole column of these:

ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo
ooxxoo

and, in effect, make a shielded tunnel, for instance.

Or, I could make something like this

Code: Select all

          ooooxxoooo
ooooooooooooooxxoooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooxxoooooooooooooo
          ooooxxoooo

by laying DT all around it.

Just strictly hypothedical... I'm not thinking about a shielded tunnel unit or something.

The reason why I cannot use "c" or whatever it is, and just have the unit's script say that its construction zone was always open (as in, a factory) is because I might want to use this "x" zone at the same time as the "c" zone on a factory.

[AF]

In factories, this is very similair to how it should work, units can walk through but the difference is that its flawed, you can build things like turrets in the openings.

[Guessmyname]

already possible. the y yardmap tag is for areas that units can walk over, but as part of the building it cannot be built on. A tag for an area of a building that *can* be built on would be good though

[KDR_11k]

Too baed Spring ignores y on anything except mines.

[zwzsg]

I've been wishing forever that Spring supports not new yardmap type but merely old TA ones.

[Caydr]

Too baed Spring ignores y on anything except mines.

Amen

[Neddie]

Too baed Spring ignores y on anything except mines.

Can this be changed?

[Argh]

You can make everything a mine, and just set the value to nearly zero.

[AF]

not true, it doesnt useit for mines, you can build 100 mines ontop of eachother if they're not set as blocking.

[KDR_11k]

not true, it doesnt useit for mines, you can build 100 mines ontop of eachother if they're not set as blocking.

Well, it evidently works then, no?

[AF]

If ti worked then youd be able to build 1 mine and have allied units walk through it but the same mine would block a second mine built ontop.

Instead the second mine is not blocked and gets built and a 3rd and a 4th etc.

[VonGratz]

I've been wishing forever that Spring supports not new yardmap type but merely old TA ones.

+One
Particularly for my new gates.
http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10589
VonGratz

[Caydr]

nudgewhine