New Map - Tumult

hunterw · Post by **hunterw** » 11 Aug 2007, 20:04

my 6th map.

14x14 meant for 2v2, 3v3, or 4v4s. dust off ur kbots folks.

also feel free to steal the palm trees, but be careful as they are too high poly to be making forests of.

kbot

vehi

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 11 Aug 2007, 20:38

Hurm... looks better than it might play, but we will see. Maybe I can get in a 4v4 with you lads this weekend.

1v0ry_k1ng · Post by **1v0ry_k1ng** » 11 Aug 2007, 21:38

hunterw- turning maps into an artform since '06

Comp1337 · Post by **Comp1337** » 11 Aug 2007, 21:50

hunterw- Naming maps with a 't' as first letter since '06

EDIT oh and i love the palm trees

FLOZi · Post by **FLOZi** » 12 Aug 2007, 01:24

Hurrah, more penises.

AF · Post by AF » 12 Aug 2007, 02:03

ooh one of the hills.

Still, the big tall cliff son tabula are the worst for phallic imagery. Some BA players see female anatomy in the corner valleys.

Goolash_ · Post by **Goolash_** » 12 Aug 2007, 05:21

FLOZi wrote:Hurrah, more penises.

You should have seen the beta version... only one word could describe it: GOATSE
hunter knows what I'm talking about.

If this map plays anything like the beta version then this is your best map by far and the palm trees are pure win, did you make them yourself? and I see you even buffed up the texture so the slope will be more visable.
All in all: Fing NICE!

Comp1337 · Post by **Comp1337** » 12 Aug 2007, 12:43

Goolash_ wrote:GOATSE

Aww man i see it now

hunterw · Post by **hunterw** » 12 Aug 2007, 15:06

Goolash_ wrote:the palm trees are pure win, did you make them yourself?

yeah, i finally cracked out 3dsmax for a spring map. lots of hoops to jump through to get a feature working, much less one with transparency/specular...really odd how they put that together.

if you guys see dicks and other such whatnot in this one you are trying too hard

imbaczek · Post by **imbaczek** » 12 Aug 2007, 16:24

you sir have a sick mind.

LBPB · Post by **LBPB** » 13 Aug 2007, 12:14

nice map as alway

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 13 Aug 2007, 18:06

I wonder, when are you going to break into map sizes ideal for large games? Say, 28x24 or larger?

hunterw · Post by **hunterw** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:03

not until i get some more ram. i was barely able to open up the texture map of my 20x20 and put metal spots on it - had to turn off undo etc.

2 layers @ 10240x10240 pixels is pretty memory intensive

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:09

And i prefer high quality balanced 1v1 maps

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:29

1v1 does not comprise the entirety or even the majority of play.

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:32

neddiedrow wrote:1v1 does not comprise the entirety or even the majority of play.

What does this have to do with anything? Large games do not comprise the entirety or even the majority of play either.

Dragon45 · Post by **Dragon45** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:52

tombom wrote:
neddiedrow wrote:1v1 does not comprise the entirety or even the majority of play.
What does this have to do with anything? Large games do not comprise the entirety or even the majority of play either.

yes they do

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:56

Dragon45 wrote: yes they do

neddiedrow wrote: Say, 28x24 or larger?

No they don't.

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 13 Aug 2007, 22:57

Thanks, Dragon.

Well, zwzsg thinks that the majority of play is offline against many bots... if that is the case, multiplayer maps of large size are still preferable for the largest number of people.

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 13 Aug 2007, 23:08

Sorry, I'm being a dick.

Spring RTS Engine

New Map - Tumult

New Map - Tumult