Not anymore, he was permabanned recently. He spent his time finding the SA bans which were inarguable and posting them as examples of Lowtax's scam.Boirunner wrote: Keep it Real is just this really crazy obsessed guy that spends hours a day on sass making shit up about sa/lowtax. What he has to say about anything is of no relevance at all.
hawt
Moderator: Moderators
i got banned from sa forums a couple times
the first was back when registration was free and i just spammed a bunch of crap to get banned for fun
the second was an acct i registered when it was free but by the time i got banned it was pay
it was so gay the way i was banned
some fag made some huge ass diatribe thread about how one word replies were the scourge of society.
some admin said he would ban anyone that posted a one word reply to the thread...
so i replied:
"two words"
the first was back when registration was free and i just spammed a bunch of crap to get banned for fun
the second was an acct i registered when it was free but by the time i got banned it was pay
it was so gay the way i was bannedsome fag made some huge ass diatribe thread about how one word replies were the scourge of society.
some admin said he would ban anyone that posted a one word reply to the thread...
so i replied:
"two words"
Hahaha, you really have to special to get permabanned from sass. He probably made a website about sass now.tombom wrote:Not anymore, he was permabanned recently. He spent his time finding the SA bans which were inarguable and posting them as examples of Lowtax's scam.Boirunner wrote: Keep it Real is just this really crazy obsessed guy that spends hours a day on sass making shit up about sa/lowtax. What he has to say about anything is of no relevance at all.
There's actually an anti-SASS board made as a joke that he started posting on seriously after he was banned complaining about it.Boirunner wrote:Hahaha, you really have to special to get permabanned from sass. He probably made a website about sass now.
SA is like thatneddiedrow wrote: To be fair, you earned a punishment for that one. On the other hand, a banning is rather harsh.
negative, i completely circumvented the rules that mod gaveneddiedrow wrote:To be fair, you earned a punishment for that one. On the other hand, a banning is rather harsh.hunterw wrote:"two words"
if the thread was about replies having no content then i would have deserved it, but it was specifically about one word replies
in conclusion i resent that admin and i hope they drown in urine
pff not anymore now what with the probationstombom wrote:
SA is like that
Logical extrapolation from the stated rule indicates that what you did would be considered a problem. In addition, expressing disrespect to the administration through challenging their authority in text is in many places a cause for punishment in itself.
This is the internet. The rules are fluid, the worlds are dictatorships, and the magic is without end.
This is the internet. The rules are fluid, the worlds are dictatorships, and the magic is without end.
i was simply pointing out the flaw in the original poster's thesis...two word replies can be just as void of content as one word replies
the OP had no complaint about contentless replies, however; his problem was specifically with one word replies. the admin's rule was also specifically for one word replies.
e-penises being brandished wildly is the problem, not my reply
the OP had no complaint about contentless replies, however; his problem was specifically with one word replies. the admin's rule was also specifically for one word replies.
e-penises being brandished wildly is the problem, not my reply