I sincerely hope there is a hell...
Moderator: Moderators
Cut off the foreskin, and it prevents disease, cures cancer, and makes you three feet taller. Basically. I don't know what the latest statistic on it is, but a large number of american males have it forced upon them
Something just as bad happens to girls in some countries/cultrues. To us it's disgusting and horrible, to them it's normal. To us stoning is horrible, to them it's normal. To most any reasoning person, circumcision is a violation of everything america allegedly stands for, but to them it's the norm.
Different people, different cultures. Don't judge them for what their parents told them was right and wrong, and don't assume they're Islamic (and of course TERRORISTS!!!!) because they're black. The blatant ignorance and arrogance some Americans display sometimes is just startling. Not that it's their fault, they're taught to believe they're the center of the universe and the free world in School. Hell, some of them couldn't show you where Iraq or Iran are on a map, or even Canada for that matter...
Stoning? Ha. I'll show you something genuinely terrifying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhTZ_tgMUdo
...these people have nukes and enough guns for every man, woman, and child.
Something just as bad happens to girls in some countries/cultrues. To us it's disgusting and horrible, to them it's normal. To us stoning is horrible, to them it's normal. To most any reasoning person, circumcision is a violation of everything america allegedly stands for, but to them it's the norm.
Different people, different cultures. Don't judge them for what their parents told them was right and wrong, and don't assume they're Islamic (and of course TERRORISTS!!!!) because they're black. The blatant ignorance and arrogance some Americans display sometimes is just startling. Not that it's their fault, they're taught to believe they're the center of the universe and the free world in School. Hell, some of them couldn't show you where Iraq or Iran are on a map, or even Canada for that matter...
Stoning? Ha. I'll show you something genuinely terrifying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhTZ_tgMUdo
...these people have nukes and enough guns for every man, woman, and child.
Last edited by Caydr on 05 May 2007, 21:56, edited 2 times in total.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
See, the difference between circumcision and FGM or stoning is that circumcision doesn't have negative side effects.
FGM removes the woman's ability to derive pleasure from intercourse, out of a religious or cultural conviction that sex is exclusively for the man's pleasure.
Stoning results in the one being stoned becoming rather permanently indisposed.
FGM removes the woman's ability to derive pleasure from intercourse, out of a religious or cultural conviction that sex is exclusively for the man's pleasure.
Stoning results in the one being stoned becoming rather permanently indisposed.
he spaek teh truthsFelix the Cat wrote:See, the difference between circumcision and FGM or stoning is that circumcision doesn't have negative side effects.
FGM removes the woman's ability to derive pleasure from intercourse, out of a religious or cultural conviction that sex is exclusively for the man's pleasure.
Stoning results in the one being stoned becoming rather permanently indisposed.
You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.rattle wrote:different countries different customs
Taking the US as an example here, I'm pretty sure they (the military and government of course) have done much, much nastier things in less time and they've been doing it right under everyone's nose. Only difference is that they've got the media to make their actions look right.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Yes I can. I completely can. If you participate in stoning a woman to death, you are a cretin of the lowest sort. You don't get excused because "it's your culture". If I were to "go lynch me some n****rs 'cause it's my culture", I'd be wrong regardless.rattle wrote:You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.
edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
Last edited by Felix the Cat on 06 May 2007, 01:04, edited 1 time in total.
- Lindir The Green
- Posts: 815
- Joined: 04 May 2005, 15:09
- KingRaptor
- Zero-K Developer
- Posts: 838
- Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44
- KingRaptor
- Zero-K Developer
- Posts: 838
- Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44
The US has experienced an oil crisis before, in the mid-1970s. Of course, no-one's learned a thing since then.
If things get really desperate there are oil reserves in Canada (second only to Saudi Arabia) and Alaska, but we really should have moved to things like fuel cells, developed better electric cars, invested in biodiesel, hell...anything by 2000. Instead, we're still hopelessly addicted to a source of energy that should have been phased out last decade.

If things get really desperate there are oil reserves in Canada (second only to Saudi Arabia) and Alaska, but we really should have moved to things like fuel cells, developed better electric cars, invested in biodiesel, hell...anything by 2000. Instead, we're still hopelessly addicted to a source of energy that should have been phased out last decade.
The way I see it, there are two directions the Middle East can go. One way is the democratized nations that Bush is trying to institute. The other way is them pushing the western nations until somebody lights off a nuke.
Edit: oh, and as a ray of hope for lowering our reliance on oil: http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/87 ... drcrd.html
Garbage goes in one end, electricity and hydrogen come out the other (along with some waste products that could be treated similar to raw ores.)
Edit: oh, and as a ray of hope for lowering our reliance on oil: http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/87 ... drcrd.html
Garbage goes in one end, electricity and hydrogen come out the other (along with some waste products that could be treated similar to raw ores.)
So you would rather force your ideals upon these people, if you had the chance to. No I don't agree with that because it's wrong. Reminds me of the christian crusades.Felix the Cat wrote:Yes I can. I completely can. If you participate in stoning a woman to death, you are a cretin of the lowest sort. You don't get excused because "it's your culture". If I were to "go lynch me some n****rs 'cause it's my culture", I'd be wrong regardless.rattle wrote:You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.
edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
I agree with sanctions or embargos for countries in which basic human rights aren't preserved.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
I'll let Wikipedia explain.Lindir The Green wrote:How are we supposed to define right or wrong if not by the general consensus of those around us?Felix the Cat wrote:edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
Natural rights
Inalienable rights
I suppose this is what I get for trying to engage in actual constructive discussion.P3374H wrote:We do what Felix says is right, of course!
Shall I go back to my usual antics?
As much as I like the concept of natural rights, they're still subjectively defined by your culture and your society. The only difference is that you expect them to be accepted all over explicitly rather than implicitly.
Natural rights arise out of social contract, and for those outside the contract, how can you assert that they apply? As much as I wish life were that simple, it isn't.
Natural rights arise out of social contract, and for those outside the contract, how can you assert that they apply? As much as I wish life were that simple, it isn't.
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
I don't particularly believe in natural rights or inalienable rights. In my option the rights of individuals are subjective to sociaty and they tend to be constantly and fluidly changing. I believe that sociaty has responsibilities to protect individuals and parrallely promote abstractness and order within itself, this responsibility leads to certain quoted rights to be protected by society in the majority of situations.