I sincerely hope there is a hell... - Page 2

I sincerely hope there is a hell...

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Cut off the foreskin, and it prevents disease, cures cancer, and makes you three feet taller. Basically. I don't know what the latest statistic on it is, but a large number of american males have it forced upon them

Something just as bad happens to girls in some countries/cultrues. To us it's disgusting and horrible, to them it's normal. To us stoning is horrible, to them it's normal. To most any reasoning person, circumcision is a violation of everything america allegedly stands for, but to them it's the norm.

Different people, different cultures. Don't judge them for what their parents told them was right and wrong, and don't assume they're Islamic (and of course TERRORISTS!!!!) because they're black. The blatant ignorance and arrogance some Americans display sometimes is just startling. Not that it's their fault, they're taught to believe they're the center of the universe and the free world in School. Hell, some of them couldn't show you where Iraq or Iran are on a map, or even Canada for that matter...

Stoning? Ha. I'll show you something genuinely terrifying:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhTZ_tgMUdo

...these people have nukes and enough guns for every man, woman, and child.
Last edited by Caydr on 05 May 2007, 21:56, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

See, the difference between circumcision and FGM or stoning is that circumcision doesn't have negative side effects.

FGM removes the woman's ability to derive pleasure from intercourse, out of a religious or cultural conviction that sex is exclusively for the man's pleasure.

Stoning results in the one being stoned becoming rather permanently indisposed.
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

Felix the Cat wrote:See, the difference between circumcision and FGM or stoning is that circumcision doesn't have negative side effects.

FGM removes the woman's ability to derive pleasure from intercourse, out of a religious or cultural conviction that sex is exclusively for the man's pleasure.

Stoning results in the one being stoned becoming rather permanently indisposed.
he spaek teh truths
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

I never knew that circumsicion actually effects sexual intercourse. Huh.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

rattle wrote:different countries different customs
You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.


Taking the US as an example here, I'm pretty sure they (the military and government of course) have done much, much nastier things in less time and they've been doing it right under everyone's nose. Only difference is that they've got the media to make their actions look right.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

rattle wrote:You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.
Yes I can. I completely can. If you participate in stoning a woman to death, you are a cretin of the lowest sort. You don't get excused because "it's your culture". If I were to "go lynch me some n****rs 'cause it's my culture", I'd be wrong regardless.

edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
Last edited by Felix the Cat on 06 May 2007, 01:04, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PicassoCT
Journeywar Developer & Mapper
Posts: 10454
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 21:12

Post by PicassoCT »

Felix not everybody in Europe is that way. So please no prejudices, even if there are single individuals who give cause & Reason to be angry.
Human rights for the workx. Always. Everywhere. No Excuse, no hiding..
User avatar
Lindir The Green
Posts: 815
Joined: 04 May 2005, 15:09

Post by Lindir The Green »

Felix the Cat wrote:edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
How are we supposed to define right or wrong if not by the general consensus of those around us?
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Post by Peet »

We do what Felix says is right, of course!
User avatar
KingRaptor
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 838
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44

Post by KingRaptor »

We can accept that things like this are part of their culture, but we have no obligation to support it.

I propose we cut off all foreign aid and trade with any country which accepts/endorses such things as Sharia law, FGM, stonings, and the like.
User avatar
Zpock
Posts: 1218
Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 23:20

Post by Zpock »

KingRaptor wrote:We can accept that things like this are part of their culture, but we have no obligation to support it.

I propose we cut off all foreign aid and trade with any country which accepts/endorses such things as Sharia law, FGM, stonings, and the like.
There goes the oil.
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

We don't need oil! The only people who need oil are those people who drive cars!

oh wait...
User avatar
KingRaptor
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 838
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44

Post by KingRaptor »

The US has experienced an oil crisis before, in the mid-1970s. Of course, no-one's learned a thing since then. :roll:

If things get really desperate there are oil reserves in Canada (second only to Saudi Arabia) and Alaska, but we really should have moved to things like fuel cells, developed better electric cars, invested in biodiesel, hell...anything by 2000. Instead, we're still hopelessly addicted to a source of energy that should have been phased out last decade.
User avatar
Decimator
Posts: 1118
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 04:15

Post by Decimator »

The way I see it, there are two directions the Middle East can go. One way is the democratized nations that Bush is trying to institute. The other way is them pushing the western nations until somebody lights off a nuke.

Edit: oh, and as a ray of hope for lowering our reliance on oil: http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/87 ... drcrd.html

Garbage goes in one end, electricity and hydrogen come out the other (along with some waste products that could be treated similar to raw ores.)
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

Felix the Cat wrote:
rattle wrote:You can't really judge these men for what they've done and what their ancestors probably have been doing since 2000 years.
Yes I can. I completely can. If you participate in stoning a woman to death, you are a cretin of the lowest sort. You don't get excused because "it's your culture". If I were to "go lynch me some n****rs 'cause it's my culture", I'd be wrong regardless.

edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
So you would rather force your ideals upon these people, if you had the chance to. No I don't agree with that because it's wrong. Reminds me of the christian crusades.

I agree with sanctions or embargos for countries in which basic human rights aren't preserved.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

Lindir The Green wrote:
Felix the Cat wrote:edit. Keep your moral relativism in Europe, thank you very much.
How are we supposed to define right or wrong if not by the general consensus of those around us?
I'll let Wikipedia explain.

Natural rights

Inalienable rights
P3374H wrote:We do what Felix says is right, of course!
I suppose this is what I get for trying to engage in actual constructive discussion.

Shall I go back to my usual antics?
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

felix the fat
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

Ishach wrote:felix the fat
<3 isaac
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

As much as I like the concept of natural rights, they're still subjectively defined by your culture and your society. The only difference is that you expect them to be accepted all over explicitly rather than implicitly.

Natural rights arise out of social contract, and for those outside the contract, how can you assert that they apply? As much as I wish life were that simple, it isn't.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

I don't particularly believe in natural rights or inalienable rights. In my option the rights of individuals are subjective to sociaty and they tend to be constantly and fluidly changing. I believe that sociaty has responsibilities to protect individuals and parrallely promote abstractness and order within itself, this responsibility leads to certain quoted rights to be protected by society in the majority of situations.
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”