Upspring 1.54 - Page 15

Upspring 1.54

Discuss the source code and development of Spring Engine in general from a technical point of view. Patches go here too.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

I'm still failing to see the advantages for a model made as 3do in the first place
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

ease of no art skill is required in texturing them. They also use 1 texture for the lot of them.

I also like how quickly I can crank one out. I use them to frequently crap out prototypes even when I am working on a s3o.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Think you missed my point smoth - I wasn't dismissing the 3do format, rather that a model made as a 3do in the first place is probably not very suited to becoming a s3o
User avatar
MadRat
Posts: 532
Joined: 24 Oct 2006, 13:45

Post by MadRat »

Some people don't want to spend a disproportionate amount of time working on largely reduntant elements. Like I was saying to smoth, some people can live with less granularity in their mod when it comes to modelling so that they can concentrate on mod elements that matter to them.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

madrat gundam wasn't created in a month... the project is going on 3 years now.

I started with ugly models.

Image
Image

I worked out much of the game play long ago, now it is adapting to spring and adding new units that were not possible in TA.


But my origonal models looked like this:
Image

Do not be so quick to think that because my mod looks nice that is all I spent my time on. I hate how people on this forum keep saying that... "some people work on balance over looks" or maybe it is really "some people have spent ample time on the two of them"

christ, yeah gundam is all pretty and NO balance.
User avatar
MadRat
Posts: 532
Joined: 24 Oct 2006, 13:45

Post by MadRat »

I would clump your mod in with the long established mod category, so it would make sense to spend time on the look and feel at this point. But in my opinion we need more "new" mods and to do this we need fresh modders. This new wrinkle to upswing makes it possible for people familiar with TA unit creation to get in on the ground level and actually make s3o-based units.
User avatar
MadRat
Posts: 532
Joined: 24 Oct 2006, 13:45

Post by MadRat »

dp
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

The only thing that is unclear is why s3o, it is an extra amount of work for yourself and them.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

upspring

"s3o based units" don't grow on trees, it's actually hard work, even though you can get away with sloppy work.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

s3o based units don't grow on trees but neither do 3do based ones.
User avatar
Fanger
Expand & Exterminate Developer
Posts: 1509
Joined: 22 Nov 2005, 22:58

Post by Fanger »

Having done Both S3o, and 3do units in a decent enough amount to comment on this, both formats have their virtues and their bottleneck points.. It takes roughly the same amount of time to model both a 3do or an S3o in whatever system your using, however S3o's bog down when you have to arrange and set up the UVmap, where as 3do's bog down when you have to actually texture them..

However IN the short run once you master setting up UVmaps IT is actually faster to make a s3o than a 3do because of the ease in texturing at least if you have a usable graphics program like Photoshop..

S3o also does one thing that 3do cannot do well, and that is allow you to use more unusual geometry on the model. a 3do only textures well if all the faces are flattened squares or rectangles, any distortion shows up immediately. S3o DOES NOT HAVE THIS ISSUE, I can make a hexagon, a triangle what have you and have no texture distortion IF I do my UV map right.. This makes models like what I did for my alien group possible only in s3o as such models would look like shite in 3do.. S3o is superior.. if you dont have the time to learn it and move to it, then maybe you shouldnt be making a mod..


As far as converting a 3do to an s3o via some work around.. THIS IS FAIL for the same reasons that 3do fails, it will set up all the faces as square, but they are not SQUARE.. they never are this will cause texture distortion and require you to redo the UVmap.. what is the point of converting a model when you are going to have to do the tricky part (setting up the UVMAP) again anyways.. someone explain this to me..
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

I still think it was a good idea to put a 3do to s3o converter in upspring. Someone may have some use for it. As I mentioned it would have been good if there was some spacing to avoid ugly outlines. That and perhaps some better arrangement for even lower texture sizes.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

Ugly outlines are a mipmapping artifact, mipmaps compress areas the size of a power of two into one pixel. If this thing works like the texture atlas the texture borders will be on lines that are powers of two and as such the mipmapping won't cross them.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Wtf...

Could someone explain second textures to me...?
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Alright, thanks a lot, I was wonderin what was goin on with the textures... I made a secondary texture and it didn't work right.. :oops:

edit: Problem is still not fixed!!! The whole thing in UpSpring appears reflective, yet.. I only have a few faces that way... Perhaps its UpSpring's coding as the problem...
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Seems to work fine for Argh (and me, in as much as i've used texture2, which is rather little)
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Meh.. Screw it, I'm just gunna let it loose ingame and see what happens. If theres THAT big of a deal, then I'm just not gunna use one.. Or spend a few hours lookin through all of the secondary texture information.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

Upspring is so broken it's just plain annoying. Example: This s3o has some of its parts mirrored along the Z axis (note that they weren't mirrored when the model was assembled from objs and they were also rotated by 90° after the first save). The parts thigh_r and shoulder_r need to be mirrored. Try it, mirror thigh_r and shoulder_r along the Z axis (scale -1). Save, reload, the parts are still mirrored. Hardly the only time Upspring completely broke a model upon saving. WTF is happening there? Why isn't it saving the model it has in the editor, why does it introduce random errors?
User avatar
jcnossen
Former Engine Dev
Posts: 2440
Joined: 05 Jun 2005, 19:13

Post by jcnossen »

upspring mirrors them because spring mirrors them. You really have to do better than that before claiming its broken.
Post Reply

Return to “Engine”