Supcom is teh suck

1v0ry_k1ng · Post by **1v0ry_k1ng** » 27 Nov 2006, 22:25

supcom dosnt look amazing. the graphics are terrible in terms of functionality. that is, to play the game you dont actually look att he graphics, as at a playble zoom all the units are specs. hence, SUPCOM LICKS KKTHX

Felix the Cat · Post by **Felix the Cat** » 27 Nov 2006, 22:36

And to think that I risked all sorts of personal insults and flames when I said that SupCom would suck three months ago.

AF · Post by AF » 27 Nov 2006, 22:47

@swift

In 2004, the brittish government launched a hefty inquiry into one of these things, and their results? Andrex cant call their toilet paper the softest because it wasnt and had lost out to a no frills cheap ownbrand product by asda.

I guess things are lax in america, but some countries make a big deal out of these things.

1v0ry_k1ng · Post by **1v0ry_k1ng** » 27 Nov 2006, 23:06

it isnt the softest, so now it has puppies on the paper. what a great thought. wiping your ass on puppies. their unto a winner.

Lolsquad_Steven · Post by **Lolsquad_Steven** » 27 Nov 2006, 23:09

TBH i like supcom, the way i've been playing it, it's really intense. But it still feels like strategic icon warz.

Post by **det** » 27 Nov 2006, 23:39

Forboding Angel wrote:BTW why do all those "good" players typically stick with spamming flash Tanks and Mavs?

I have had really good luck owning tank/mav-spammers using a nice combination of mavs/snipers/aa kbots with good micro to ensure only the mavs take fire.

MrNubyagi · Post by **MrNubyagi** » 28 Nov 2006, 02:00

discriminatingly banned by decimator

Spring RTS Engine

Supcom is teh suck