Absolute Annihilation 2.23 - Page 39

Absolute Annihilation 2.23

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

Lippy wrote: crossing_4_final

:roll:
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

Lippy wrote:
NOiZE wrote:well then the unit can be removed IMO, it's just utter useless then.
I just played a match on crossing_4_final where the match turned into a kind of stalemate where neither team could seem break through the other teams defense and so people started to resort to things like big berthas. I on the other hand started pumping out spy bots and cloakable tanks, so that i could spot for my allies' berthas and then take out key structures with my cloaked tanks. What they did was build two seismic detectors and made a fighter patrol, which basically made my cloaked units obsolete (should air units be able to see cloaked units so easily????)

So IMO in normal normal matches, yes I agree they are quite useless, but in some cases they do seem to be usefull. It's a bit like the Krogoth eh?

EDIT: So in conclusion i would either lose the unit, or make cloakable units harder to detect (especially from air: maybe if its possible, make scout planes detect cloakable units, but all other planes cant?)
like steatlh bots are going to get in the enemy base....
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

Just played a game and it seems bulldogs can't crush dragonsteeth anymore... is this supposed to happen? :cry:
Lippy
Posts: 327
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 00:24

Post by Lippy »

NOiZE wrote: like steatlh bots are going to get in the enemy base....
:shock:I may not have played as much as you, but i manage to get spy bots into enemy bases all the time, all it needs is a bit of micro. In fact I'm surpised that you even suggested that stealth bots cannot get into enemy bases..

Cabbage wrote:Just played a game and it seems bulldogs can't crush dragonsteeth anymore... is this supposed to happen?
Yep i realised this as well...very annoying! I think caydr did that as people were complaining the dragonsteeth were useless. However, IMO, a bulldog should be able to crush dragonsteeth (albeit be the only arm unit that can) and for core, only the goliath and maybe reapers should be able to do this!
Lippy
Posts: 327
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 00:24

Post by Lippy »

Ishach wrote:
Lippy wrote: crossing_4_final

:roll:
Hey at least it aint speedmetal! :-)

(Its actually not that bad a map; i found a lot of the games actually end in early T2)
User avatar
Acidd_UK
Posts: 963
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 02:15

Post by Acidd_UK »

I think it's a fun map :)

Oh and hey any response about air repair pads?
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

While I actually enjoy seeing dt block bulldogs (especially when I'm late to tech2) its complete BS!!!

DT should not block off heavy tanks and units in or above that weight class.

Units that should easily pass LVL-1 DT on ARM are Triton, BullDogs, Penetrator, MERL, Fatboy, Scarab, and all LVL-3 Mech units.

Units that should easily pass LVL-1 DT on CORE are Reaper, Kraken, Banisher, Tremor, Diplomat, Goliath, HedgeHog, Sumo, and all LVL-3 Mech units.

Fort Walls should block all except Bantha, Krogoth, and Juggernaut.

There are a few other units which would likely be able to cross over a DT and the Fort walls dispite their weight, and thats the ATV units.

ARM's spiders, CORE's Termite spider, and the crawling bombs, IMO should be able to pass over DT and FORTwalls without destroying them or having to Crush them.
The question is if thats possible given how the engine handles these units.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

I don't really think the L2 Walls should block everything they do, to be honest.
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

I also think its pretty sad if you guys can stalemate on Crossing_4_final.

Its much too wide open to easily stalemate, you're just not using the right tactics, start playing CORE, they're the ultimate PORC busters.
User avatar
Min3mat
Posts: 3455
Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 20:19

Post by Min3mat »

can we get back on topic?
flash/gator -> cav?

also maybe ~5% more Buildtime and maybe a 200 more e cost increase for the panther?
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

Flash needs a slight nerf imo, less armour or less firepower, not loads less but it seems very strong at the moment, Ive seen about 2 people play core in the last 20 games Ive played, stronger flash and weaker gator seems to be the reason.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

Crossing_4 is not wide open at all.


16x8, that means with 8 players (4 per team), each person only needs to fortify 2 vertical map units each.
am0kk
Posts: 14
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 07:51

Post by am0kk »

Just a quick question, I built some doomsday machines in AA2.23 and they wouldnt fire - had plenty of E and they were in the correct on/off state ->

To get them to shoot, I had to manually target each enemy unit :cry:

Has anyone else found this?
NightSky
Posts: 7
Joined: 15 Jul 2006, 02:02

Post by NightSky »

I built some doomsday machines in AA2.23 and they wouldnt fire - had plenty of E and they were in the correct on/off state ->
I had this happen today with the arm Annihilator
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

noautofire=1?
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

Ishach wrote:Crossing_4 is not wide open at all.


16x8, that means with 8 players (4 per team), each person only needs to fortify 2 vertical map units each.
Crossing_4 is indeed a chokepoint porcfest if played with individuals who aren't playing as teams - if each player plays alone, then they each take a thin strip of map, and as soon as one dies, they all fall as your onslaught hollows the others out. Which is why it's terrible for just hop-in-and-play games. But if you have some teamplay it becomes a much more open map - an allied assault can easily break the line.
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

Ok Pxlt, name a single team oriented map where 1 player falls, but the others can survive and turn their noses at their fallen comrade.

If you say speedmetal I'm gonna smack you. :idea:

We need a damn Heart shape Emoticon ffs...
Hellspawn
Posts: 392
Joined: 24 Feb 2006, 11:54

Post by Hellspawn »

BigSteve wrote:Flash needs a slight nerf imo, less armour or less firepower, not loads less but it seems very strong at the moment, Ive seen about 2 people play core in the last 20 games Ive played, stronger flash and weaker gator seems to be the reason.
No, balance is IMO perfect atm. Instigators own flashes in equal fight, but flashes are faster, so they are better for raiding (and worse for brute fighting).
Lippy
Posts: 327
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 00:24

Post by Lippy »

Hellspawn wrote:
BigSteve wrote:Flash needs a slight nerf imo, less armour or less firepower, not loads less but it seems very strong at the moment, Ive seen about 2 people play core in the last 20 games Ive played, stronger flash and weaker gator seems to be the reason.
No, balance is IMO perfect atm. Instigators own flashes in equal fight, but flashes are faster, so they are better for raiding (and worse for brute fighting).
+1
User avatar
edrush
Posts: 5
Joined: 26 Jun 2006, 00:54

Post by edrush »

Lippy wrote:
Ishach wrote:
Lippy wrote: crossing_4_final

:roll:
Hey at least it aint speedmetal! :-)

(Its actually not that bad a map; i found a lot of the games actually end in early T2)
yeah by maverick rush :/ Anybody else thinking that maverick is abit overpowered? lately too many games have ended by getting my base razed by one or two mavericks :(( speed of maverick should be slowed down a bit?
Post Reply

Return to “Game Releases”