Changing the rules of KoAA! - Page 2

Changing the rules of KoAA!

Please use this forum to set up matches and discuss played games.

Moderator: Moderators

Should we change the Com explosion rules?

Yes!
10
50%
No!
5
25%
Don't care, the ladder will make the "king off" system useless anyway.
5
25%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
ginekolog
Posts: 837
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 13:49

Post by ginekolog »

use only THIS:

In 1vs1 games any commander that dguns, self destructs, or commander bombs another commander will result in a loss.

It was a good rule in OTA and will be here.


Talking about startbase is nonsense as anyone has diffirenet oppinion. For me startbase is 3wind3mex and kbotlab. Nothing else.


So drop out start base rule and let rules still be simple.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

I think the KO system is silly and don't really play spring much, but I will air my opinion anyways.

First of all, it's not a gameplay rule we are discussing, it's a "King of AA" rule. So things like "it ruins the game to force people to play a specific way" is no longer valid, just like tournaments have rules.

I think:

Code: Select all

In 1vs1 games any commander that dguns another commander, self destructs their commander, or commander bombs another commander, in a match where the commander death ends the game, will result in a loss.
might be a good way to put it.

Otherwise, in any KoAA match that ends in a mutual comsplosion, the challenger can re-challenge for the title, with the option to make the match "comdeath=continues" in the rematch.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

well, actually it's fine to self D your commander as long as you are not doing so in such a way that you blow up the opposing commander so we really shouldn't include this in the list, I think the best way to put it is:

In 1vs1 games where the commander death ends the game, any commander who moves to initiate a mutual comsplosion in a match will result in a loss, if the players cannot agree and an impartial judge is unable to determine who the agressor was (or if the players are unable to agree on a suitable impartial judge), a rematch can be immediately requested by the challenger, normal rules apply for this challenge except the challenger is allowed to choose the end conditions.
Kixxe
Posts: 1547
Joined: 14 May 2005, 10:02

Post by Kixxe »

Notice: Puplic Apolegise to Angel: She did'nt Com bomb everytime to win. She did it once, agsint sleksa, and then gave the title to him. Sorry. :wink:


I still think that the rules should be changed, and since the "majority" agrees, i will edit it tonight. Please don't revert it.
Drawer
Posts: 25
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 21:25

Post by Drawer »

Rules changes are stupid - its not important to change rules for minority all real players can beat. Also its impossible to change the rules because it would totally change he ranking - so just dont mess with it because its impossible. DOT.
Post Reply

Return to “Ingame Community”