AF COOKIEBOT HAS NO PLACE SPAMMING IN THE MAIN
Moderator: Moderators
AF COOKIEBOT HAS NO PLACE SPAMMING IN THE MAIN
about the triviaroom or how many cookies or bananas it gave to someone
whos isnt even logged on....how long before another idiot decides he wants to autospam main too?
anyway, it needs to stop with a long mute or ban or af being told to
STOP SPAMMING THE MAIN.
whos isnt even logged on....how long before another idiot decides he wants to autospam main too?
anyway, it needs to stop with a long mute or ban or af being told to
STOP SPAMMING THE MAIN.
- Drone_Fragger
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49
Okay, Betalord, Remove Chanserv please, I'd like to see how long the channels last without a Cahnserv.hawkki wrote:I must agree! no bots belong in the main chat. NONE.
What about when other people start putting their bots in main? Where is the line how much the bot may post? A full-sized trivia ongoing ? Or just cookie stats ?
private channels are for that, keep #main strictly as user discussion!
Also, its about 1 line per 10 minutes. Spam? I think not. I make more posts a day than I see it advertising anything.
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
you create alot of useless spam urself, mainly related to supernoob
POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK
Admit it, you don't even care about 'spam' in the lobby, you just came here to make trouble and start drama.
you spam main ee.
this is oftopic or lobby btw.
Yeah, hypocritical tripe at its best.
ee's afraid that robots will have much greater spamming capabilities then he could possibly imagine and he'll be made obsolete.
Argumentum ad hominem. (now working)ee himself is a source of spam...... lets be right.
/fail
Last edited by Felix the Cat on 13 Aug 2006, 08:10, edited 2 times in total.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
A better description, and the url works unlike the one posted.
Although you are partially correct with ad homminem
A better description, and the url works unlike the one posted.
Although you are partially correct with ad homminem