Are we making mods or games?

Are we making mods or games?

Discuss game development here, from a distinct game project to an accessible third-party mutator, down to the interaction and design of individual units if you like.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Are we making mods or games?

Post by Snipawolf »

We have to make models,textures,scripts, and other things in our "mods"...

Are we making the mods or the games?
User avatar
FireCrack
Posts: 676
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 09:33

Post by FireCrack »

mods.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Are we making mods or games?

Post by smoth »

Snipawolf wrote:We have to make models,textures,scripts, and other things in our "mods"...

Are we making the mods or the games?
orly? how many mods have actually taken the step to generate all of their own content?

As far as mods are games... I like to think some of us ARE making games that play in spring. However, all the TA varients are merely mods.
User avatar
Erom
Posts: 1115
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 05:08

Post by Erom »

Right now? Mods.

Two conditions need to happen to make them true Games:

1) The Spring engine needs to abstract away from TA. It is doing this, slowly. Eventually, once it weens itself off of any OTA legal dependencies, and abstracts things like the resource model, the UI, building and upgrading mechanics, ect, then it will be more of a true multi-game engine rather than "just" a 3D TA engine.

I say "just" because, come on, even in it's current state Spring is pure kickass awesomesauce.

2) The mod maker needs to go the whole mile, replacing all textures, models, sounds, ect. And not just with things like TA but not TA, but with their own style and visual flair. Some mods are already pretty close to this. However, in addition the mods must be unique from a gameplay perspective as well. It would also be a big plus if the UI was unique and identifiable to that mod alone.

If these conditions are met, then yes, I think a mod can transform itself into a "real" game. For precident I would look to the UT mod Red Orchestra.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

Erom wrote:
2) The mod maker needs to go the whole mile, replacing all textures, models, sounds, ect.
Models: check
Textures: check
Sounds: check
Visual flare: check
own style: check

Unique gameplay: all games fail after chess....

So how does gundam lack the title of game? At the moment there are 3 things it needs to sepperate it's self from the rest of this lot: Melee weapons, unit limits, customizeable gui.

All things were created from scratch. When I started the mod(outside of testing phase) I started with a blank directory, the fedcom and a tank(the t61).

so... where did I fail?

Erom wrote:If these conditions are met, then yes, I think a mod can transform itself into a "real" game. For precident I would look to the UT mod Red Orchestra.
Red Orchestra is a TC isn't it?
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

mods

Post by Pxtl »

Imho, a new "game" doesn't occur until you cannot tell what engine it was made on. Spring games till look like TA:Spring. They've the same GUI, the same nanolathes, similar functionality, etc. Now, there's no shame in this, making a new game is not necessarily a better or lesser achievement than a mod. Team Fortress is definitely a mod, Daikatana is definitely a new game, and I don't think anyone has illusions about which is "better".

Maybe when we get customized guis, more intricate cusomization of resources, unit AIs, command structure, etc. in Spring, then we'll be able to call the mods games. But right now, I just don't think the Spring engine is really capable of anything more than "mods". Just my $.02CAN.
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

I think of mods as a bunch of minigames, each one branched off of the main trunk of Spring. Like a tree. And we all love tree's. But the mods are not QUITE distinctive enough to be considered full fledged games. GUI and resouses, as Pxtl says.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

Hmm, I believe that pxtl gets a win. Thread Concluded, lock before spam degeneration please.
User avatar
Erom
Posts: 1115
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 05:08

Post by Erom »

Yeah, smoth, sorry if I sounded antagonistic. Gundam is pretty damn close, but right now it is held back by the stuff under point (1) above. It needs the engine flexibility to move away from the Spring GUI and the nanoparticle effect to be cut lose. It's no fault of yours.

And Red Orchestra was a TC originally, then it aquired (by winning a contest) a copy of the engine license from the Epic/Atari/whoever-owns-the-franchise guys and is planning to be marketed commercially (Over Steam last time I heard...). Like I said, it was a mod. Now it's a game.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

wow, I did not know red orchestra went full on indie
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

GEM is a game of its own.

I can see why you'd say AA isn't its own game, though I think of it as being "the game I made", since I've worked on it so long. It's a creative outlet of mine which I've spent years working on.... so it's mine! ALL MINE!!!! :twisted: (with content stolen from across the known universe)
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

you didn't do all the art, sound, textures or scripts... not yours.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Interesting replies everyone, I dunno, mine will be a game on my side, and still a mod on the engine side, doesn't make a difference :P
User avatar
Guessmyname
Posts: 3301
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07

Re: Are we making mods or games?

Post by Guessmyname »

smoth wrote:
Snipawolf wrote:We have to make models,textures,scripts, and other things in our "mods"...

Are we making the mods or the games?
orly? how many mods have actually taken the step to generate all of their own content?

As far as mods are games... I like to think some of us ARE making games that play in spring. However, all the TA varients are merely mods.
Spring 1944

Star Wars Spring

Gundam Annihilation

Gear Commander

EDIT: And Nanoblobs

Those are the ones that immediately spring to mind (no pun intended)
Last edited by Guessmyname on 21 Jul 2006, 12:48, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

umm, guessmyname... I made gundam remember...

Also, starwars is still using Ota stuff and last time I looked the same is true of AATA... aka 1944. It should be noted that these two are making efforts to strip out ota content :).... which makes me happy :)

as far as mods... you are also forgetting nanoblobs.
User avatar
Guessmyname
Posts: 3301
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07

Post by Guessmyname »

Oh damn.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

???????????
User avatar
Guessmyname
Posts: 3301
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07

Post by Guessmyname »

Oh and Panties's Spring version of Operation Polaris too
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

yeah, I am looking forward to that. I liked the OTA mod.
User avatar
unpossible
Posts: 871
Joined: 10 May 2005, 19:24

Post by unpossible »

it certain seems like 'mod' should be gametype nowadays. modding implies you start with something and tweak it a little - OTA based ones, but when you're creating something from scratch you clearly drift away from that catagory.
Post Reply

Return to “Game Development”