Spring RTS Engine

eliminate the need for a con that can only be built by the comm. Every constructor can build it. whooops. Missed that. my bad Do you realize you can still build striders by specops constructor? Yes- but my point was to eliminate the need to build a specs con using another con. and the specops const...

In the suggestions thread, I voted against the one faction suggestion. But now i'm beginning to reconsider. If this is implemented, could creating two factions become a future goal? Once OTA free-status is achieved, and game play is fairly balanced/workable, it should be easier to redivided new/old ...

Can i retract my disagree against the 1 faction? I'm uncertain of my feelings after reading the thread on it. Depends how well planned implementation is. Another quasi-noob suggestion- do we *really* need all of the different constructor units? hover/amphib/naval- could be one unit. Partly that's th...

Disagree with 1 faction. Neddiedrow says it better than I could. A third faction might be interesting, but probably totally unfeasible, unless CA actually # # Auto-skirmish / micro for raiders / auto mex dumbs the game down Disagree, It allows for more focus on strategy, and less bogging down in uni...

Hi - The link in the first post in this thread that says "always a direct link to the latest version" gives me a 404. Direct links are not provided any more. The link should be removed. Use Spring Downloader. Newbie comenting here- but was was that removed? Spring downloader is glitchy fo...