Spring : 1943 has a forum!

Spring : 1943 has a forum!

Discuss game development here, from a distinct game project to an accessible third-party mutator, down to the interaction and design of individual units if you like.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Spring : 1943 has a forum!

Post by Das Bruce »

It can be found here.

So if you've got any questions or suggestions just post them there.

And thanks to Caydr for hosting it.
User avatar
GrOuNd_ZeRo
Posts: 1370
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 01:10

Post by GrOuNd_ZeRo »

not ANOTHER WW2 mod!

there is:

-Operation Barbarosa (Defunct)
-TA:1945 (still under development by Nitrous)
-AA:TA
-WW2 Reborn (although not a historical WW2 recreation)

i'm sure I might have missed some others.
maestro
Posts: 352
Joined: 08 Jun 2005, 11:10

Post by maestro »

daniel WW2 have nothing to do with WW2...
or WW2 here is 'weird. weird' as it combines tank vs pterodactyl vs hannibal elephant vs jet fighter vs..... :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

GrOuNd_ZeRo wrote:not ANOTHER WW2 mod!

there is:

-Operation Barbarosa (Defunct)
-TA:1945 (still under development by Nitrous)
-AA:TA
-WW2 Reborn (although not a historical WW2 recreation)

i'm sure I might have missed some others.
Currently I've seen one in development for spring and it sucks.

So shut up and leave or be productive.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Das Bruce wrote:
GrOuNd_ZeRo wrote:not ANOTHER WW2 mod!

there is:

-Operation Barbarosa (Defunct)
-TA:1945 (still under development by Nitrous)
-AA:TA
-WW2 Reborn (although not a historical WW2 recreation)

i'm sure I might have missed some others.
Currently I've seen one in development for spring and it sucks.

So shut up and leave or be productive.
Spring:1943, then? ;)

Honestly, 40mm weapons for the germans and russians. Ok. Great historical accuracy! (only the british used 40mm as a standard calibre) Nevermind your Russian '88'. :| :lol:

To be fair i have no problem with you or your mod, its an arcade, CnC type approach to it. AATA is a simulation. Just a difference of taste.

But do not dismiss it out of hand having played a very buggy TA port!

As for taking that tone with G_Z, well, it just goes to show how ignorant you are. (Of course, Spiked was very much as pigheaded as you are. :P )
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

I was just using that as an example given to me by the other people over a smaller weapon to be used their instead. I was thinking pak-40, unless you have a better suggestion?

This is why I'm not the historian.

And I found WD to be equally unplayable.
User avatar
yuritch
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 07:18

PaK-40

Post by yuritch »

PaK-40 is a 75mm gun, quite powerful (good against any tank found in 1943). There were smaller German AT guns: PaK-35/36 37mm, PaK-38 50mm. 37mm gun was barely able to damage T-34 (very specific places on the tank's hull had to be hit), KV-1 tanks ignored 37mm guns completely (but there were a lot of lighter armored vehicles at the beginning of war).
maestro
Posts: 352
Joined: 08 Jun 2005, 11:10

Post by maestro »

FLOZi wrote:
Das Bruce wrote: Spring:1943, then? ;)

Honestly, 40mm weapons for the germans and russians. Ok. Great historical accuracy! (only the british used 40mm as a standard calibre) Nevermind your Russian '88'. :| :lol:
:P )
for realism sake Russian dont use 88mm but 85mm heavy AA which have similar character with germany 88.....
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

Send all these ideas to http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~aa/forum/vi ... 453fd4d439 damnit! Thats what this whole thread was supposed to be about.
j5mello
Posts: 1189
Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 05:40

Post by j5mello »

then ask an admin to lock it
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

No, this discusion still keeps it near the top. :P
User avatar
sintri
Posts: 55
Joined: 30 Nov 2005, 18:38

Post by sintri »

sea sea and sea? or c&c, hmm sea, navyfield was nice, love naval. naval naval naval, cavities, naval cavities? yes.
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

Uhh, yes there will be naval warfare. However we're trying to get the land units sorted first, however if you're a modellor or texturer you're welcome to help out and speed things along. :-)
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

maestro wrote:
FLOZi wrote: Spring:1943, then? ;)

Honestly, 40mm weapons for the germans and russians. Ok. Great historical accuracy! (only the british used 40mm as a standard calibre) Nevermind your Russian '88'. :| :lol:
:P )
for realism sake Russian dont use 88mm but 85mm heavy AA which have similar character with germany 88.....
The 85mm wasn't used as an AT weapon to any great extent afaik, though?

It's easy to build both sides to the same tree at first glance but once you look at the underlying doctrine... :(
maestro
Posts: 352
Joined: 08 Jun 2005, 11:10

Post by maestro »

FLOZi wrote:
maestro wrote:
FLOZi wrote: Spring:1943, then? ;)

Honestly, 40mm weapons for the germans and russians. Ok. Great historical accuracy! (only the british used 40mm as a standard calibre) Nevermind your Russian '88'. :| :lol:
:P )
for realism sake Russian dont use 88mm but 85mm heavy AA which have similar character with germany 88.....
The 85mm wasn't used as an AT weapon to any great extent afaik, though?

It's easy to build both sides to the same tree at first glance but once you look at the underlying doctrine... :(
I dunno, in blitzkrieg 85mm kick tank ass easily though but they arent very mobile plus Russian already have decent AT gun (76mm) unlike the early germany...

bout build tree I dont care about uniformity... .Just look at WD buildtree mess :P real war ain't warcraft II.....
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

About uniformity, that is just a base build tree, sides will vary although not a great deal.
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

I don't care if it's a tank or a static structure, but you boys have got to include Dora:

Image
User avatar
Masse
Damned Developer
Posts: 979
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 18:56

Post by Masse »

WTF OMG THATS HUGE !!!... maybe ww2 mod with some arcade feel ;) some things that are not like was in the history books :)

id like all units to have simple name like assault tank... but then description gives all the useless mumbojumdo
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

Masse wrote:WTF OMG THATS HUGE !!!... maybe ww2 mod with some arcade feel ;) some things that are not like was in the history books :)

id like all units to have simple name like assault tank... but then description gives all the useless mumbojumdo
Yep. That Dora is real (the photos are fuzzy so I posted the illustration). It was built to crush the Maginot line. Needless to say, it was never used for that purpose... it wasn't ready at the time. The damn thing actually barely got any action because it was completed too late in the war.

Another fave is the Paris gun:

Image

Why is it called that? It was made in ww1 to shoot Paris. From Germany. Not anything in Paris, not the Paris Barracks, or the port. Just Paris.
User avatar
Masse
Damned Developer
Posts: 979
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 18:56

Post by Masse »

damn crazy germans !
Post Reply

Return to “Game Development”