For clarity: there's nothing illegal being done by spreading XTA with Spring. We require users to have the original data, so there's no problem at all in including XTA or AA. Stop acting like there is, please!
nuff said
call for testers of sync branch tvo3
Moderator: Moderators
but we are
we're distributing copyrighted content without permission, and although we ask that users have the OTA data we're not ensuring it, we're instead providing the data we ask that they own.
So while that stands there are lots and lots of websites that refuse to acknowledge this project, several linux distributions who would distribute spring but wont because of the XTA content, there is a heck of a lot of potential in spring that isnt there because of the insistence of keeping XTA with the installer.
XTA should be a seperate download
we're distributing copyrighted content without permission, and although we ask that users have the OTA data we're not ensuring it, we're instead providing the data we ask that they own.
So while that stands there are lots and lots of websites that refuse to acknowledge this project, several linux distributions who would distribute spring but wont because of the XTA content, there is a heck of a lot of potential in spring that isnt there because of the insistence of keeping XTA with the installer.
XTA should be a seperate download
BvDorp, what you say is bullshit IMHO: if I upload a windows torrent and put a notice somewhere that you must own windows to install it then it isn't suddenly legal. Same applies to any copyright violation, it doesn't matter if it's XTA, Windows or some random mp3 you're distributing, adding a notice that you must own the original doesn't make it any less illegal then it is.
(Otherwise everyone would be allowed to redistribute everything by just putting a notice on it that you must own the original to download it. If that was the truth anti piracy organisations wouldn't exist.)
Conclusion: I fully agree with AF here.
(Otherwise everyone would be allowed to redistribute everything by just putting a notice on it that you must own the original to download it. If that was the truth anti piracy organisations wouldn't exist.)
Conclusion: I fully agree with AF here.
- Tim Blokdijk
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 11:18
- clericvash
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05
For gcc I don't really remember, and it doesn't really matter anyway since it works now.
For MSVC it could be an idea but I heard a debugging build was almost unplayable slow, so not sure if it will work.
Also, for information of people reading this thread, branches/tvo3 has been merged into trunk. So if you want to test, just test trunk.
For MSVC it could be an idea but I heard a debugging build was almost unplayable slow, so not sure if it will work.
Also, for information of people reading this thread, branches/tvo3 has been merged into trunk. So if you want to test, just test trunk.