I never said I've never played it. Even testing it on speedmetal (which isn't really qualified as "testing" it, I know, but I don't exactly have uber time to throw down on it right away, what with GW:Factions and all ^_^) you can see all the flaws mentioned in this thread. I understand it's the original release and that things won't be close to perfect -- not by a long shot. I was merely commenting and my message was not intended for anyone who happens to read emotion into text. >.>haven't even considered seriously playing it.
Expand & Exterminate .155 Released!
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: 09 Aug 2005, 15:41

Okay, heres a report on (most) units which should help on balancing. The efficiency score is worked out from a myriad of things and not just the values shown, and only works well for units with similar roles, so dont compare AA with ground assault, but more like lvl1 ground defenses vs level 2 ones, builders, etc. It is actually quite reliable if you know how to interpret, which you may choose to ignore it due to ignorance or arrogance. I havent got the time to be arguiing what should be made of this info, see if you can find any use to it.
http://www.fileuniverse.com/?p=showitem&ID=3055
http://www.fileuniverse.com/?p=showitem&ID=3055
So, last night I hosted a 7 player free for all on Splintered Tropics, an island map with water shallow enough to allow for effective E&E gameplay.
There are a number of issues that jump out, and a number of strong points.
First of all, I stated before the public release that the seeming ineffectiveness of defensive strategy and defensive units would damage the gameplay greatly. No offense meant (And no pun either) but I was correct, Fang. Don't worry about it, it's what we expected, and players must adapt to it...
Weak Points
1. Air v Anti-Air: The former is far more effective, too cheap, and rather quick to build up. There is no effective anti-air strategy, as far as I can tell.
2. Mines: Mines are barely effective two minutes into the game, let alone ten. None of the seven players utilized them, as a result of this being common knowledge.
3. Planned Actions: They're useless. The game is so fast, nobody can plan a constructor's activity three buildings ahead.
Strong Points
1. Water: Water is carefully balanced between the two extremes of absurd power and uselessness. It's actually fun to utilize, for once, yet water control alone cannot win a battle.
2. Battle Pace: The game is rapid, fun, and even nearing realistic.
3. Graphics: The units are beautiful, diverse, and interesting. My favorite is by far the six-legged spider constructor.
Now... I really don't want to weigh in on the metal maker/refinery idea. It shifts the economic system absurdly. I won't dabble in the URC v GD arguement.
So... the mod lives up to it's name. You must expand and exterminate, and the game is very fast-paced. The most important question, of course, is whether it is too fast-paced and aggressive for the player base.
I enjoy watching it, I think it's good work, and like all mods it just needs refinement.
-Sehkmet Out
[/list]
There are a number of issues that jump out, and a number of strong points.
First of all, I stated before the public release that the seeming ineffectiveness of defensive strategy and defensive units would damage the gameplay greatly. No offense meant (And no pun either) but I was correct, Fang. Don't worry about it, it's what we expected, and players must adapt to it...
Weak Points
1. Air v Anti-Air: The former is far more effective, too cheap, and rather quick to build up. There is no effective anti-air strategy, as far as I can tell.
2. Mines: Mines are barely effective two minutes into the game, let alone ten. None of the seven players utilized them, as a result of this being common knowledge.
3. Planned Actions: They're useless. The game is so fast, nobody can plan a constructor's activity three buildings ahead.
Strong Points
1. Water: Water is carefully balanced between the two extremes of absurd power and uselessness. It's actually fun to utilize, for once, yet water control alone cannot win a battle.
2. Battle Pace: The game is rapid, fun, and even nearing realistic.
3. Graphics: The units are beautiful, diverse, and interesting. My favorite is by far the six-legged spider constructor.
Now... I really don't want to weigh in on the metal maker/refinery idea. It shifts the economic system absurdly. I won't dabble in the URC v GD arguement.
So... the mod lives up to it's name. You must expand and exterminate, and the game is very fast-paced. The most important question, of course, is whether it is too fast-paced and aggressive for the player base.
I enjoy watching it, I think it's good work, and like all mods it just needs refinement.
-Sehkmet Out
[/list]
OK here is a basic changelog for version .151
Code: Select all
General Changes
-NI removed as a side choice
-typos fixed (keep a lookout though)
-ctrl-c now works
-Sub health lowered
-Anti-sub weapons damage is raised
-lvl 2 & 3 turrets health nearly doubled
-starionary turrets ranged increased
-rocket weapons range made equal to cannon/plasma weapons
and AoE raised
Side Specific Changes
-GD AAA (mobile & stationary) Turret speed raised, projectile speed raised, and weapon AoE raised
-URC lvl 1 plasma gunship cost raised, damage lowered, and health lowered
-GD scout tank damage lowered vs. units
Last edited by j5mello on 29 Apr 2006, 20:27, edited 3 times in total.
Well, considering that it was sixth game of E&E, and the first ffa one? I looked through all of the replays... and I hosted two other AI games to check how AAI and OTAI held up. As a side note... AAI is buggy, OTAI favours GD heavily.Min3mat wrote:to actually even think of evaluating a mod on a 7 player ffa...
and the six legged spider constructer? thats a scout...
You didn't seriously think I evaluated it on one game, did you? I simply mentioned the most interesting game, because for some reason, E&E has the best FFA experience I have ever seen.
: O
Nice change-log.
Also, i am not so sure if rockets needs such a buff. Rocket Bots are nearly as much ownage as they were during the first beta, if you buff them, they will just be worse.
But lets see.
Also if you buff the health of the advanced defenses, why not buff lvl 1 too ?
The first lvl 1 of towers is where the the line stands or falls to the enemy lvl 1 spammage, plz buff lvl 1 turrets also, or we wont reach lvl 2 still.
Nice change-log.
Also, i am not so sure if rockets needs such a buff. Rocket Bots are nearly as much ownage as they were during the first beta, if you buff them, they will just be worse.
But lets see.
Also if you buff the health of the advanced defenses, why not buff lvl 1 too ?
The first lvl 1 of towers is where the the line stands or falls to the enemy lvl 1 spammage, plz buff lvl 1 turrets also, or we wont reach lvl 2 still.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
L1 turrets:Andreask wrote:: O
Nice change-log.
Also, i am not so sure if rockets needs such a buff. Rocket Bots are nearly as much ownage as they were during the first beta, if you buff them, they will just be worse.
But lets see.
Also if you buff the health of the advanced defenses, why not buff lvl 1 too ?
The first lvl 1 of towers is where the the line stands or falls to the enemy lvl 1 spammage, plz buff lvl 1 turrets also, or we wont reach lvl 2 still.
He did buff them, they have longer range
That is a pretty big buff and does not change them from their intended role, it just makes them better at it.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
unfortunately this is not something that anything can really be done about. It is an engine thing and rely's on workertime.Zenka wrote:Hmm, I also noticed that builder deform the map very slowly. This is holding you up when you want to place a turret on a small hill, where the ground needs heavily deformed.
In reality there needs to be a tag to tell spring how fast a worker can terraform.
I dont think settling for second best is a good way to approach a problem, especially when it takes only a few minutes to change the 200 or so values needed. open all units up and close them as the changes get made, at one value every 10 secs (extremely conservative) it would be well under an hourDecimator wrote:Zenka, while it is possible to fix that, it would be a huge amount of work for very little benefit. It would require changing every single building's buildtime, and every single con unit's workertime.
then I have to balance the new times... etc.. it would be better if there were 2 different build values, one for constructing and one for terreforming...
side note, in addition to what mello posted, i also fixed 3 graphical bugs in the plasma units aiming, and increase aircraft cruise alt from roughly 150 to 300..
side note, in addition to what mello posted, i also fixed 3 graphical bugs in the plasma units aiming, and increase aircraft cruise alt from roughly 150 to 300..
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
The terraforming is about the same speed as in aa. I don't hear anyone complaining about aa neededing to change all the buildtime values and workertime values.krogothe wrote:I dont think settling for second best is a good way to approach a problem, especially when it takes only a few minutes to change the 200 or so values needed. open all units up and close them as the changes get made, at one value every 10 secs (extremely conservative) it would be well under an hourDecimator wrote:Zenka, while it is possible to fix that, it would be a huge amount of work for very little benefit. It would require changing every single building's buildtime, and every single con unit's workertime.
It's fine as it is.
Korgothe, not second best dude. #1 there is no issues cause like I said before, it it just as fast as in aa.
THis is something that needs to be changed in the spring engine. Linking terraform ability to workertime was just not a good way to do things.
NEW VERSION - http://www.fileuniverse.com/?p=showitem&ID=3057
- Guessmyname
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07
You know if you tell the unit terraforming to repair the building (the nanoframe will always appear) it stops terraforming and starts buildingZenka wrote:Hmm, I also noticed that builder deform the map very slowly. This is holding you up when you want to place a turret on a small hill, where the ground needs heavily deformed.
Well i played my second game, with the new version, and I had a BLAST! Two three man teams against eachother. The battle immideatly went toe to toe in the middle of the map. Me and Nutrilze made a good team. We smashed Blue's defences. Unfortunantly we couldent take and HOLD the ground quick enough, and Blue (working with Yellow) took the land back. We repeated this five times, with progressivly bigger guns. In the end it was yellow's snarky tactics that won. They suddenly appeared (possibly useing air transports) and smashed me in the groind (economaly speaking), destroying my nuke reactor and cutting the power to my lasers. With no factorys, builders, mines, or econ of any sort i handed my defence's to Nurilze and whatched. One by one our side was pounded by the enemy, but I am glad to say everyone put up a strong fight. J5mello kicked some ass for quite some time, with a really cool looking defensive formation. I learned the power of well placed artillery, both on my side and on the enemy's side.
And to anyone who has problems with swarms: Have your own. Ten tanks against mabey twenty mechs, and the tanks will win every single time. But only if you USE them right. If you have artillery back up, to soften the enemy, radar support and finnaly LINE YOUR UNITS UP, then you will win. However if you throw a blob of tanks at a blob of mechs, then the mechs will win. Why? Because they are faster, and can swarm around your tanks and blast them from all sides, maximizing their fire power. At least thats what I noticed.
Just my Two cents.
Oh and Fang thank you SO much for this mod!
And to anyone who has problems with swarms: Have your own. Ten tanks against mabey twenty mechs, and the tanks will win every single time. But only if you USE them right. If you have artillery back up, to soften the enemy, radar support and finnaly LINE YOUR UNITS UP, then you will win. However if you throw a blob of tanks at a blob of mechs, then the mechs will win. Why? Because they are faster, and can swarm around your tanks and blast them from all sides, maximizing their fire power. At least thats what I noticed.
Just my Two cents.
Oh and Fang thank you SO much for this mod!