More like "Art for procrastination's sake"smoth wrote:"Art for art's sake" anything else is uncivilized :)

Moderator: Moderators
More like "Art for procrastination's sake"smoth wrote:"Art for art's sake" anything else is uncivilized :)
Engine Devs: ohay, we broke yer shit!hokomoko wrote:Very accurate.PicassoCT wrote:You know, that is pretty bitter. People here do a job, do a job well, they could do for lots of money.
Hell, you even get laughed at by other techys for joining the game-industry, cause its a stupid move moneywise.
I donated to the server - although i allmost never played on it.
We all contribute and all take.
And we might not make it. No fame and groupies. Not even praise by critics. Maybe all that will remain, is some cobwebbed usb some day with my game on it- and no plattform around to play "grandpas" game.
No reason to get bitter.
99% of the folks here do things to make themselves and others happier. Being pissed or making others pissed is greatly out of place.
+1 to that. It's pointless being bitter towards volunteers, it only makes them less likely to help you.99% of the folks here do things to make themselves and others happier. Being pissed or making others pissed is greatly out of place.
I'm highly familiar with this issue, and one of my personal goals as an engine dev (and as a person?) is behaving differently and communicating better with the game devs (even if we often don't see eye to eye). I hope they think I succeed and I will keep on trying anyway.Engine Devs: ohay, we broke yer shit!
Me: ok
Engine Devs: Fix yer shit!
Me: looks for any and all documentation to find essentially, nothing. Yells at engine devs
Engine Devs: we broke your shit and it's your fault that we broke your shit and you're a douchebag for complaining about it because our time is worth more than yours and we're still not going to tell you how to fix it.
I would.Super Mario wrote:I doubt that anyone would try to make money by selling their games using spring engine.
You would? Well good luck handling the legal technicalities with your lawyer with the gpl license.gajop wrote:I would.Super Mario wrote:I doubt that anyone would try to make money by selling their games using spring engine.
Pretty easy - just release your lua with a GPL compat license.Super Mario wrote: You would? Well good luck handling the legal technicalities with your lawyer with the gpl license.
well, if the engine devs will want to be paid and gajop would want to pay, sure. But it's pretty hard to do it fairly with so many devs over the years.Super Mario wrote: If you do somehow manged to be successful, then be sure to pay at least 5% of your sales to the engine devs of a way of saying thanks.
Not every game dev out there wants to do that though.hokomoko wrote:Pretty easy - just release your lua with a GPL compat license.Super Mario wrote: You would? Well good luck handling the legal technicalities with your lawyer with the gpl license.
Since the alternative is picking a different engine, that's a non-issue.Super Mario wrote:Not every game dev out there wants to do that though.
Speak for yourself. Oh wait you contribute nothing...Super Mario wrote:Not every game dev out there wants to do that though.hokomoko wrote:Pretty easy - just release your lua with a GPL compat license.Super Mario wrote: You would? Well good luck handling the legal technicalities with your lawyer with the gpl license.
Look smoth, I have no idea what exactly that I did to piss you off, but quit it with your personal attacks.smoth wrote: Speak for yourself. Oh wait you contribute nothing...
Well I'm sure you don't mind losing potential game devs then, because from what I had read, that is major decided factor for some people.hokomoko wrote:Since the alternative is picking a different engine, that's a non-issue.Super Mario wrote:Not every game dev out there wants to do that though.
It doesn't matter what I think. Engine is GPL, end of discussion.Super Mario wrote:Well I'm sure you don't mind losing potential game devs then, because from what I had read, that is major decided factor for some people.hokomoko wrote:Since the alternative is picking a different engine, that's a non-issue.Super Mario wrote:Not every game dev out there wants to do that though.
How is stating that license is a major deciding factor for some people a felony? You are getting unreasonably defensive here.hokomoko wrote: It doesn't matter what I think. Engine is GPL, end of discussion.
https://springrts.com/wiki/Felony#11.
I would too.Super Mario wrote:You would? Well good luck handling the legal technicalities with your lawyer with the gpl license.gajop wrote:I would.Super Mario wrote:I doubt that anyone would try to make money by selling their games using spring engine.
If you do somehow manged to be successful, then be sure to pay at least 5% of your sales to the engine devs of a way of saying thanks.
smoth is pissed off by ideaguys who constantly criticize and attack others without contributing anything of their own. He's quite consistent about that actually.Super Mario wrote:Look smoth, I have no idea what exactly that I did to piss you off, but quit it with your personal attacks.smoth wrote: Speak for yourself. Oh wait you contribute nothing...
That ship have sailed long ago.The Yak wrote:Which I didn't.You've done little in this thread except criticize engine devs for their contributionsI claim no such thingclaim to speak for the game developers here.Personal attacks is not an argument.During which you have made apparent you have no clue what your talking about and have very little experience working with the engine and it's games.You are free to continue to do so as long as you are respectful, but don't expect to make any friends this way.