sad thing neddie seldom posts here anymoar - he is too busy roasting trolls somewhere else.
Concerning mental disorders - after reading about them watching some interesting cases (the world is full of people with problems) i m no longer that certain that the description disorder really fits anymore. Lets take a psychatrists, whos job by modern definition is to help those in unbearable mental circumstances (heavy neurosis, depressions with suciidal tendencies, schizophrenia+additional symptoms like social isolation) by easing this disease to a level were the patient can easily live with it.
Now lets take a fire(wo)man. (s)He has a mental disorder called Codependency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codependency which found often in helping jobs has lead to the name "helper-syndrom" and by that way is often nearly suicidal at his taks, to get as reward some selfacceptance.
(s)He gets treated, it works, (s)he is now less mentall disorderd, cares more about (him/her)self, and one night this factory burns, maybee going boom the next minute, because there are loads and loads of fertilizer stored, in the middst of a harbour, who is shock- in the middle of a city.
Now our mentall disorder first discovers, that he doesent long anymore to safe people sacrificing his own skin. He also discovers, that most of his colleges are cowards, very very happy in the second line - and only getting into the inferno when carefully made drunk or set under drugs. Long Story, short sumarum: City goes boom, mentall disorder cured, cured brain becomes a rather fractal wallpainting on a smoking ruin.
Question: Was it right to sacrifice the wellbeeing of the many for the happiness of one man? Or is a society unfair, which is secretly based upon people suffering for it? Is it unfair to ask with biased questions?