Demo wrote:Sure, its lame when people try and wind other people up on purpose, but I'd say more often than not these people get wound up even though nobody is actually trying to achieve this.
If this were an isolated incident yes you would be fine in saying that but it isn't isolated. If they're made aware that they're unintentionally winding someone up and despite that continue to do it, that's trolling. Numerous people on these forums do this and have done it for the past 2 years or longer.
Swiftspear, we have large giants roaming our community building things. These giants are pestered by trolls who walk around and throw a stone when nobodies looking then whistle and walk away. The giant gets angry as this happens on a regular basis. The giant after a few cocurrences starts going on rampages to try and defend themselves. The moderator however punishes the giant for the rampage frustrating the giant even further. The moderator did not see any boulders or bricks being thrown and ignores any small prods or stones thrown because they're small, and alone they're insignificant.
Eventually the giant leaves for greener pastures out of frustration and the stones start flying at somebody else. The giant may miss things and return only to remember why it left, and the general populous says that the giant left because they went emo on stupid things.
If I prodded you in the arm every morning on the way to work for 2 years would you be happy to let me continue? And if the people responsible for preventing it refused to discipline me because its 'just a prod' would you be happy? And if you blew up one day because of it and they labelled me as a blameless victim and you as the aggressor would you see that as fair?
And what if when you finally complained people started saying you were acting unfairly as society as a whole did not behave that way despite me not prodding each and every person alive in the arm every morning?
Now that's a predicament. Attacking or defending against the provoker labels you a provoker and the provoker a victim. No matter how thick skinned you are eventually your going to grow tired of all that constant poking, and when you do people will label you as thin skinned and unable to handle anything no matter how long you held out. Poking is a non moderatable offence and does not constitute harassment. In this situation, I as a prodder am in a win win situation. I get the kicks watching you squirm and I'm untouchable. Any attempt to touch me results in a banstick landing on your ass and a free fireworks display for me and an extra critical hit for you.
Right now the most powerful trolling tool on this forum is not the trollers themselves its the moderators who moderate harassed people for finally cracking. When this happens huge anger and resentment is generated, and it ripples out into the community. What's more the troll is not seen to be punished.
In fact unless a troll actively attacks the forum itself or a moderator, there is little or no proof to forum goers that any moderation has occurred at all save perhaps a locked thread (free personal secretary for quickly disposing of waste threads so that new ones can be started, troll friendly moderation. People forget about the thread quickly as it scrolls down into the recycle bin in the moderator forums).
Rattle is right. No exceptions for anybody. But if moderation actually dealt with the cause then these content makers who go on the rampage into moderatable behaviour would never have a reason to do so. These occurrences would be massively reduced.