BigSteve wrote:
The problem is Goolash giving your stuff away and combombing isn't a valid tactic on comm ends, the rule is com ends, if you lose your comm youre out of the game. That's the RULE, circumventing the rule by giving your stuff to your mate and then comboming an enemy out of the game is cheating, why do people find this so hard to grasp?
Please explain to me how this is cheating? if this is cheating why can i do it without typing .cheat?
It's the same as kamikaze, the player who does it dies but his team profits from his actions.
BigSteve wrote:
It was pretty obvious you were cheating without zydox saying anything tbh, and I was right too, you were cheating so I think throwing it up in the air was pretty much justified.
Bigsteve, I'll say it again, I died 4th out of a 6 player team, only dox and labris were left, how could i cheat ffs? it was already a lost battle when became a spec.
Bigsteve, I don't believe you are upset for losing to Hael and the guys after that match, I believe you are upset for getting combombed (which i failed btw so the gain was all yours, dox succeeded though) in a com ends game. If you dont wanna get com-bombed declare before the battle starts: "no combombing allowed" and then i'll follow the host's rules but in my book that's the same as the speedmetal generals saying "no attack first 10 minuts", and that's just bending the game's rules to fit your own narrow world view.
I'd agree that FPSing a plane out of the map or FPSing a Moho Exploiter to hit targets half the map away is exploiting the engine weaknesses but combombing on com ends - that's not cheating, that's a difference of opinion.
One last thing: If i find it possible to com-bomb a player who is in doing better than i am in a clan match I will try to do it in order to better my clan chances of winning. you say it's cheating, I say it's sacrificing myself for the good of the team.