You support Bush?

nobody2u · Post by **nobody2u** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:21

BlackLiger wrote:Want to know something interesting?

You can usually tell the writer of a poll's opinion by looking which option is first on the list, and so gains priority.

Good point, usually "yes" is placed before "no" but not here :O

pheldens · Post by **pheldens** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:45

LathanStanley wrote:I support him like a brother... he puts moral values, family, and security over tedius crap like money.

His morals are double, checked amnesty international lately?
The citizen's money is flowing to the already rich.

Muzic · Post by **Muzic** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:48

Lol, All i hear in Canada is him being bashed around. I dont know enough about him, nor do i think most canadians do ( as they did a study and 1/10 people dont know who OUR prime minister is ), to actually pass judgement. On another forum i asked around if anyone did and why. Some people liked him becuase he wasnt with abortions and what not, some people saw him as the lesser of two evils. I have no political stance whatso ever.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:49

Option 2, I'd hit it. Actually the third option is missing: I'm a lazy bum and don't go voting at all. That'd be me. It's like getting two lumps of shit and you'd have to eat one.

My spelling is teh suck today.

Snipawolf · Post by **Snipawolf** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:51

Bleh, I support whoever does a good job, and Bush is doing fine..

I don't know what the hell Kerry would be doing at this time, but it probably wouldn't be a good thing..

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:54

The same probably, or worse.

pheldens · Post by **pheldens** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:57

Don't concentrate on the character too much, keep yourself informed through multiple, varyingly biased media sources, about the consequences of the policies for which he bears political repsonsibility.

BigSteve · Post by **BigSteve** » 12 Oct 2006, 00:58

Lathan, how can you possibly associate George with having moral values?
he cheated his way into the white house for godsakes! twice most likely after introducing his easily hackable electronic voting system. ^^

Ive even seen a clip of him on TV saying " I wanna be remembered as a warring president, I've always got war on ma mind"
I mean come on, hes a bloody neanderthal.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:02

He's from texas.

LOrDo · Post by **LOrDo** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:07

BlackLiger wrote:Want to know something interesting?

You can usually tell the writer of a poll's opinion by looking which option is first on the list, and so gains priority.

Heh. Its true.

Lol, All i hear in Canada is him being bashed around. I dont know enough about him, nor do i think most canadians do ( as they did a study and 1/10 people dont know who OUR prime minister is ), to actually pass judgement. On another forum i asked around if anyone did and why. Some people liked him becuase he wasnt with abortions and what not, some people saw him as the lesser of two evils. I have no political stance whatso ever.

Also true, since people are idiots no matter where you go in the world. So if you wanna bash bush in this thread, name the prime minister of Canada.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:18

I thought canada was a large ant-like collective of wood cutters.

Neuralize · Post by **Neuralize** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:40

Rich people in high places using their influence and power to make themselves and their friends even richer, who knew?

LathanStanley · Post by **LathanStanley** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:44

pheldens wrote:
LathanStanley wrote:I support him like a brother... he puts moral values, family, and security over tedius crap like money.
His morals are double, checked amnesty international lately?
The citizen's money is flowing to the already rich.

my family is well off, I'm complaining why?

LathanStanley · Post by **LathanStanley** » 12 Oct 2006, 02:50

BigSteve wrote:Lathan, how can you possibly associate George with having moral values?
he cheated his way into the white house for godsakes! twice most likely after introducing his easily hackable electronic voting system. ^^

Ive even seen a clip of him on TV saying " I wanna be remembered as a warring president, I've always got war on ma mind"
I mean come on, hes a bloody neanderthal.

thats the difference between a Republican and a Democrat.

We BOTH want $
We BOTH want security
We BOTH want infulence
We BOTH want family
We BOTH want to live
We BOTH want the US on top
We BOTH don't want our allies to perish
We BOTH don't want our enemies with nukes...

the diffference, Republicans will fight to make them happen, not sit around in the freakin white house and whine to congress and babble on the telephone like a woman.

Democrats "look" good cause they don't ever "do" bad things, but they never "do" good things either...

Republicans do do VERY "good" things too, they just get ruidicliously criticized when their intentions backfire.

you can vote for 1, a sitter, one who "talks the talk"
or you can vote for 2, warring president, one who, "walks the walk."

I take option two, Republican.

SwiftSpear · Post by **SwiftSpear** » 12 Oct 2006, 03:50

LathanStanley wrote:
BigSteve wrote:Lathan, how can you possibly associate George with having moral values?
he cheated his way into the white house for godsakes! twice most likely after introducing his easily hackable electronic voting system. ^^

Ive even seen a clip of him on TV saying " I wanna be remembered as a warring president, I've always got war on ma mind"
I mean come on, hes a bloody neanderthal.
thats the difference between a Republican and a Democrat.

We BOTH want $
We BOTH want security
We BOTH want infulence
We BOTH want family
We BOTH want to live
We BOTH want the US on top
We BOTH don't want our allies to perish
We BOTH don't want our enemies with nukes...

the diffference, Republicans will fight to make them happen, not sit around in the freakin white house and whine to congress and babble on the telephone like a woman.

Democrats "look" good cause they don't ever "do" bad things, but they never "do" good things either...

Republicans do do VERY "good" things too, they just get ruidicliously criticized when their intentions backfire.

you can vote for 1, a sitter, one who "talks the talk"
or you can vote for 2, warring president, one who, "walks the walk."

I take option two, Republican.

Ya, democrats never do good things like pulling the American economy out of the worst depression ever or initiating peace between nations that had been at war for hundreds of years. The argument could easily be made that both sides have good intentions, just one side deals with things intelligently and the other side shoots things. The fact of the matter is that right now your economy is borked and the good ol' republicans have a very poor track record fixing screwed economies. The world has very nearly reached the point where guns won't solve the problems for much longer. If you intend to solve the worlds problems by force you're going to need alot more guns than any individual nation has.

Snipawolf · Post by **Snipawolf** » 12 Oct 2006, 03:59

Initiating peace between whom?

LathanStanley · Post by **LathanStanley** » 12 Oct 2006, 04:00

SwiftSpear wrote:Ya, democrats never do good things like pulling the American economy out of the worst depression ever or initiating peace between nations that had been at war for hundreds of years. The argument could easily be made that both sides have good intentions, just one side deals with things intelligently and the other side shoots things. The fact of the matter is that right now your economy is borked and the good ol' republicans have a very poor track record fixing screwed economies. The world has very nearly reached the point where guns won't solve the problems for much longer. If you intend to solve the worlds problems by force you're going to need alot more guns than any individual nation has.

SEE this is a typical democrat response.

I as a Rupublican follow like most republicans do, you follow as most democrats do.

I, as a republican, MADE a bold statement, you took that opportunity to stand up, criticize it, and make democrats look better.

neither of us did anything "good" or "bad" but the statement I made, still stands in truth.

SwiftSpear · Post by **SwiftSpear** » 12 Oct 2006, 04:10

A smear statement is true because it was countered likewise... Interesting circular logic there...

Frankly I would vote third party if I was American. The two party system needs to be destroyed, neither party is forward thinking enough to make any real international progress. The republicans are too hard headed and the democrats are too self protecting. The world is moving too fast for conservatism.

LathanStanley · Post by **LathanStanley** » 12 Oct 2006, 04:15

SwiftSpear wrote:A smear statement is true because it was countered likewise... Interesting circular logic there...

Frankly I would vote third party if I was American. The two party system needs to be destroyed, neither party is forward thinking enough to make any real international progress. The republicans are too hard headed and the democrats are too self protecting. The world is moving too fast for conservatism.

I do agree with you there....

though I'll still vote republican over democrat...

Decimator · Post by **Decimator** » 12 Oct 2006, 04:21

Conservatism, at its core, is freedom. The government has one job, and one job only. The government's job is to protect our life, our freedom, and our property. Now, if you think that a massive bureaucracy can react to changes faster than individuals... Well, that just speaks for itself.

Spring RTS Engine

You support Bush?

You support Bush?