Defining map settings before starting a game - Page 2

Defining map settings before starting a game

Requests for features in the spring code.

Moderator: Moderators

Good idea?

Yes
18
55%
No.
15
45%
 
Total votes: 33

User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Post by Peet »

How about...all the players in the battle vote on each value, and the average is taken...
User avatar
Soulless1
Posts: 444
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 03:29

Post by Soulless1 »

how about we take the sensible option and leave it as a host setting like everything else - and just don't play games where the host has set stupid values? Just like you don't play games where the host sets stupid maps... :roll:
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

P3374H wrote:How about...all the players in the battle vote on each value, and the average is taken...
Then the pros vote 1, the speedmetaller votes 200000 and the average is somewhere around Speed Metal.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Post by Peet »

The speedmetaller is kicked within 39 microseconds of joining.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

Yes but it'd still be stupid that way, just let the host decide and if he wants to take the average that's his fault.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Post by TradeMark »

Voting always sucks in games...

I still prefer that star thing... who cares if some noob cant change those settings? he couldnt change them before either... :-)
User avatar
Soulless1
Posts: 444
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 03:29

Post by Soulless1 »

but that doesn't work because playing time isn't a reasonable gauge of common sense or good hosting ability...

If someone's going to be retarded, they'll find a way whatever the restriction (like leaving games going for hours to get that star ;)) and all that happens is the players who have better things to do get annoyed and leave

Going back to the originally posted idea - yeah I think it would definately be cool if the host had some kind of control over map settings like metal/energy/gravity/wind/hardness etc etc :-)

There should surely be some way of getting the game to insert these modifiers during the map *load sequence* without having to send each other (automatically or otherwise) actual altered map files...
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

The host should always be in charge. He's providing the host computer, so it's his decision. If he wants to run a democratic process, then that's his decision. But as far as I'm concerned, when it comes to setting up the parameters of a game The Host Is God. And I'm saying this as a person who rarely ever hosts.
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Post by Forboding Angel »

TradeMark wrote:Ya.

For the Forboding Angel, i quote himself:
Learn a few things and come back
:-)
Jesus Christ you one hell of a lark...

Look, changing metal multipliers would do nothing for you at all, simply because changing the number from 1.0 to 1.2 in any of my maps makes them produce over 120% more metal. It is not practical and makes not sense to make smd's a "floating variable" (if you will). You have no way of testing the metal amounts. This is just a stupid idea.

Also, I design my maps to be played a certain way, as does every mapper worth his salt. If you don't like the way it's set up, then tough shit, don't play it. I will not have my work BUTCHERED to satiate a few ppl who think it's a good idea.

Now, better lobby set starts IS a good idea. I'm all for that.
User avatar
FizWizz
Posts: 1998
Joined: 17 Aug 2005, 11:42

Post by FizWizz »

Thank You Forboding Angel. +1
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Post by TradeMark »

Forboding Angel wrote:If you don't like the way it's set up, then tough shit, don't play it. I will not have my work BUTCHERED to satiate a few ppl who think it's a good idea.
Wtf... who the fuck cares how your maps are played, if people likes the different settings what they use, then let them use those settings!!!!

I dont understand your philosophy. Dont we play maps for fun? :shock:
hollowsoul
Posts: 665
Joined: 06 Jun 2006, 19:49

Post by hollowsoul »

Theres are plently of maps...

Personnaly i dont see the need for this option.
If i gonna play a map i perfer to be used to the metal conitions etc...
Not start playing a map, that plays differently due to changed metal.

But if u want to boost metal just use handicap / bonus option for all players before u start.

And hasnt this come up before ?
Mappers are against it, since they went through hassle of metal values & placements to get map to play to thier liking. Personnaly i say leave it up to mappers since they go through all the work of making the maps...

Also if i join a server, i like to know ohh its such & such a map grand. And not have to wonder how the changed metal is gonna effect gameplay. Plus theres plently of maps to go around.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Post by TradeMark »

I didnt say i want to make more metal to the maps. Actually less metal, or not metal at all.

Edit:
What if we could have "remove metalmap" feature? Its fun to play maps without metal... but its not so fun to download identical map with maxmetal=0; option in its smd file...
Last edited by TradeMark on 24 Sep 2006, 19:41, edited 2 times in total.
j5mello
Posts: 1189
Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 05:40

Post by j5mello »

same difference trademark.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Post by TradeMark »

I dont think that would affect your gameplay that much you dont know what to do :d

And so what if it does affect, some challenge :)
j5mello
Posts: 1189
Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 05:40

Post by j5mello »

TradeMark wrote:I dont think that would affect your gameplay that much you dont know what to do
As an example: Forb's maps are designed around supporting E&E games and therefore have appox. 2.0 metal output per mex. If you were to go and change that the game would be far more difficult.

Honestly what is everyone's fascination with this kind of stuff? People think Greenfields is this masterfully created map that forces u to use strategy. ITS a bloody alpha map. The maker had planned on adding metal to it but never did. Now eveyone plays simbase on it thinking this was the idea all along... (No offence to the maker, it does look nice, i just wonder why u would put up an alpha for everyone to dl)

Im not saying u shouldn't play it just don't try and conform peoples maps to fit ur playstyle. The mappers work hard to balance the map to provide interesting strategies. If you wan't more metalless maps ask people to make em.
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

just disable the metal extractors?
esteroth12
Posts: 501
Joined: 18 May 2006, 21:19

Post by esteroth12 »

forb wrote:Also, I design my maps to be played a certain way, as does every mapper worth his salt. If you don't like the way it's set up, then tough shit, don't play it. I will not have my work BUTCHERED to satiate a few ppl who think it's a good idea.
QFT

if you want different gameplay, use another map. if such a map doesn't exist, guess what, Gimp is free...

e:blargh quote syntax
Last edited by esteroth12 on 25 Sep 2006, 06:02, edited 1 time in total.
Egarwaen
Posts: 1207
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 21:19

Post by Egarwaen »

TradeMark wrote:This isnt possible? EH? Nothing is impossible to program -.-
Excellent. I expect a program from you by the end of the month to determine whether a given program will terminate. :lol:
User avatar
ILMTitan
Spring Developer
Posts: 410
Joined: 13 Nov 2004, 08:35

Post by ILMTitan »

Egarwaen wrote:
TradeMark wrote:This isnt possible? EH? Nothing is impossible to program -.-
Excellent. I expect a program from you by the end of the month to determine whether a given program will terminate. :lol:
You can write a program to do that, it just wont necessarily terminate.
Post Reply

Return to “Feature Requests”