When death is immenent i have one word... er... two words. Or is it four?
whatever
Ctrl-a Ctrl-D. But see if you can get you comm close to them before you do it!
I have always wanted a "glory" button for when you know its time to bow out in the most showy way possible. The Glory Button would be a big red button, and when you clicked on it all you base will explode, and your nukes will go off to for good mesure.
DEATH OR GLORY!!!!!!!!
Is this our first CHEATER or a severe bug?
Moderator: Moderators
NAH! the 'Death or Glory' button should give all your units a 10% boost in all their stats and start a 2-min uncancelable self destruct order, so when you've finally built up that big assault force and charge you can do it with honour, giving ur opponent the win if he were to survive but 2 minutes!!! =D
I am relieved, the person in question (Tanelorn) has a history of giving his units away.Well, take a look at my demo in the brawlers-are-gay thread.
Telenorn seems to give his base to the enemy in every single game...
So there is no cheat, just one player with some real attitude problems.
Tanelorn, IMHO, that game we played...
kb9qkc (very green local friend of mine) and I fought
Tanelorn and Purpura,
giving your units to kb9qkc was rude and completely unfair to Purpura. He DID stay in the game until all of his units were destroyed even though he had no hope. There is no question that he would have had a chance if you gave your units to him instead.
Omfg....giving your units to the enemy is so selfish if your team mates want to continue. Just because you are bored the game should be over?
Someone did this when we played 3 on 3. A couple of brawlers ruined some of his defenses so he gave the enemy his units so I had a BB and some guardians firing right into my base...that`s one player I`m kicking on sight when I`m hosting!
Someone did this when we played 3 on 3. A couple of brawlers ruined some of his defenses so he gave the enemy his units so I had a BB and some guardians firing right into my base...that`s one player I`m kicking on sight when I`m hosting!
-
DavetheBrave
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005, 02:52
or you could manage a win...or have fun losing...learning something in the process...and then watching the replay....and then getting better. If you keep on doing that crap tanelorn, you are always going to get beaten by those gay gunships....and make a lot of enemies in the process.tanelorn wrote:Exactly. Game over. New game. Congradulations. No need to let it play on for another hour when we can start a new one.
Peace, i was there too, remember, and im 95% sure that devilchaser is another nick of talenorn.Peace wrote:Omfg....giving your units to the enemy is so selfish if your team mates want to continue. Just because you are bored the game should be over?
Someone did this when we played 3 on 3. A couple of brawlers ruined some of his defenses so he gave the enemy his units so I had a BB and some guardians firing right into my base...that`s one player I`m kicking on sight when I`m hosting!
He used the same expressions to justify his actions in the chat, he generally talked the same, i never seen both together and in the other thread i asked him if he used the name devilchaser... he didnt answer but only replied later with another "what im doing if fine" reply (so he did read that question, too, but chose not to falsify it).
I know for certain that _I_ wont be playing a game with him anymore. As a teammate, he is a backstabbing bastard, and as an enemy, whats the point in playing if some turncoat ruins the game at a whim?
----
FYI
Devilchaser (aka tanelorn Imho) more or less rushed to intimitator on Mars and didnt have much of a army/base to speak off. As then he started shelling our bases, which _of course_ resulted in a air assault to stop it.
I think it was 4 or 5 brawlers that attacked his intimitator, and he gave his units away before the intimitator was even destroyed....
(with the same whining: "we lost anyways" "game was over, so why make it longer", brawlers are gay and a win exploit", ect,ect).
And the most funny thing his, his teammates had brawlers too, but with him in their team those dont seem to be an "emploit"....
Well, i don't know really, but i try to play as long as posibole.
Okay, I self-destruk when the enemy get my fusion and my comander, or when they manage to get inside my base with a force so large that i know im gonna die. Ofen i still let them attack some stuff, ofen self-destrukting the fusion myself to blow the enemy up.
Giving units to your ally is the thing to do. Just becouse you don't think it's a snowballs shot in hell your gonna win your allys it gonna try atleast.
Giving to your enemy is stupid. Really stupid. I don't know if anyone does this, but it's just really stupid. IF you don't wanna play, give them to your ally, Shift-esc and find another server.
Why the hell give it to the enemy anyway? So they can kill your allys faster and you can start a new game? So as soon as YOU don't find it right to play any longer, you will just say: ''BAH! they are gonna win anyway, whats the point?''
The point is to have a good spring match, and to have fun! If you don't like losing, get better or atleast let your allys have a go. We are here to have fun, and if you only find fun in winning, you should't be playing spring.
Okay, I self-destruk when the enemy get my fusion and my comander, or when they manage to get inside my base with a force so large that i know im gonna die. Ofen i still let them attack some stuff, ofen self-destrukting the fusion myself to blow the enemy up.
Giving units to your ally is the thing to do. Just becouse you don't think it's a snowballs shot in hell your gonna win your allys it gonna try atleast.
Giving to your enemy is stupid. Really stupid. I don't know if anyone does this, but it's just really stupid. IF you don't wanna play, give them to your ally, Shift-esc and find another server.
Why the hell give it to the enemy anyway? So they can kill your allys faster and you can start a new game? So as soon as YOU don't find it right to play any longer, you will just say: ''BAH! they are gonna win anyway, whats the point?''
The point is to have a good spring match, and to have fun! If you don't like losing, get better or atleast let your allys have a go. We are here to have fun, and if you only find fun in winning, you should't be playing spring.
When the enemy wins by using a skillless exploit like brawlers, you are no longer in a 'good game' you are in an impossible game where the indestructable brawler swarm wins over everything.
If you can't get into the enemy base and they are making brawlers, they win. It's that simple.
I've played plenty of games where the enemy is porcin most of the game, with a base that can't be breached with your current level of equipment, and they spend all their time building brawlers with 10000x farks crowded around the factory.
As soon as you actually do some damage to them, they release the swarm and destroy everyone's bases.
The argument about attacking their resources is pointless when all their resources are in the porc. And with their brawlers you can't send in attack units unless they are 2x krogoths, cuz only krogoths can survive brawler swarms due to their 2 shot per second guided artillery missiles of doom. And even then I've seen brawler swarms beat out a krogoth.
So. The simple fact is that if there is a brawler swarm on the map, the owner of that swarm has won the game, unless he's really stupid and throws them into a circle of flakkers and lets them sit there.
So when you see that, you might as well throw in the towel. Game over.
If you can't get into the enemy base and they are making brawlers, they win. It's that simple.
I've played plenty of games where the enemy is porcin most of the game, with a base that can't be breached with your current level of equipment, and they spend all their time building brawlers with 10000x farks crowded around the factory.
As soon as you actually do some damage to them, they release the swarm and destroy everyone's bases.
The argument about attacking their resources is pointless when all their resources are in the porc. And with their brawlers you can't send in attack units unless they are 2x krogoths, cuz only krogoths can survive brawler swarms due to their 2 shot per second guided artillery missiles of doom. And even then I've seen brawler swarms beat out a krogoth.
So. The simple fact is that if there is a brawler swarm on the map, the owner of that swarm has won the game, unless he's really stupid and throws them into a circle of flakkers and lets them sit there.
So when you see that, you might as well throw in the towel. Game over.
...
So your justefieng your action bye brawlers?
Just play on a BRAWLERS BANNED server! I mean, you aculy wanna play with brawlers even thou you give up on the sight of them?
Are you gonna do this everytime? Do something really stupid so everybody hates you and then blame it on a unfair unit? Just don't play with em! You have choice! Don't play games with Gunships in them!
Esay as that, and if you do, no-one is gonna kick you in the nut-sack for being a jackass.
And trowing in the towel is a diffrent thing then giving you units to the enemy.
It's like saying: ''Hey, the English are gonna win this cuz they cheated and counter attacked. Might aswell join em and attack our freinds and familys! YAY''.
Selfdestrukting is giving up. Giving your units it treson.
So your justefieng your action bye brawlers?
Just play on a BRAWLERS BANNED server! I mean, you aculy wanna play with brawlers even thou you give up on the sight of them?
Are you gonna do this everytime? Do something really stupid so everybody hates you and then blame it on a unfair unit? Just don't play with em! You have choice! Don't play games with Gunships in them!
Esay as that, and if you do, no-one is gonna kick you in the nut-sack for being a jackass.
And trowing in the towel is a diffrent thing then giving you units to the enemy.
It's like saying: ''Hey, the English are gonna win this cuz they cheated and counter attacked. Might aswell join em and attack our freinds and familys! YAY''.
Selfdestrukting is giving up. Giving your units it treson.
I'm never playing with tanelorn again.
Also, fighters beat gunships. They're cheaper and can be produced faster, theres really no reason not a have a swarm of them patrolling your base.
You don't decide when the game is ended, just becuase you're a bad loser doesn't mean you should ruin the fun everyone else. Sometime surviving can be fun.
Also, fighters beat gunships. They're cheaper and can be produced faster, theres really no reason not a have a swarm of them patrolling your base.
You don't decide when the game is ended, just becuase you're a bad loser doesn't mean you should ruin the fun everyone else. Sometime surviving can be fun.
Well, just for the record... i just had a game on castles where i was brawler swarmed... 1/2 of the base destroyed, but all brawlers gone, too.
Farked 2 adv aircraft plants and gave them 2 necros each producing hawks.
The next 3 swarms of brawlers destroyed 1 immolator, a few radar towers and one moho mine, iirc. But the enemy lost >100 brawlers to get there.
(and as to not be an ass and use gay brawlers swarms, i used krogoths.
Tanelorn, you may not believe me, but 3 krogs rape a base without recon and interceptors JUST as well as 150 brawlers....
Farked 2 adv aircraft plants and gave them 2 necros each producing hawks.
The next 3 swarms of brawlers destroyed 1 immolator, a few radar towers and one moho mine, iirc. But the enemy lost >100 brawlers to get there.
(and as to not be an ass and use gay brawlers swarms, i used krogoths.
Tanelorn, you may not believe me, but 3 krogs rape a base without recon and interceptors JUST as well as 150 brawlers....
-
Tim Blokdijk
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 11:18
-
SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
How do you impliment it without at some point relying on the very unreliable honor system? At some point everyone's personality rating come's down to someone else's opinion.Tim Blokdijk wrote:Why don't we make a player rating system?
Like "rank", but the idea is to rate other players for "personality".
So you can host with rule's like minimum of a 75% "good personality" rating.
Idea?
yeah...
its HARD to gauge someone fairly. Because it could be just bitching of people who lost.
But acording to others in the game he quit, he also blew up teammates bases with crawling bombs (without giving them to the enemy, just teamkilling).
So maybe teammates should be able to downmod own teammembers.
its HARD to gauge someone fairly. Because it could be just bitching of people who lost.
But acording to others in the game he quit, he also blew up teammates bases with crawling bombs (without giving them to the enemy, just teamkilling).
So maybe teammates should be able to downmod own teammembers.
-
Tim Blokdijk
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 11:18
Well, I don't know how exactly it could work, but if two people I played a good game with say that they had a good game with another person I would absolutely pick that player to play a game with.IMSabbel wrote:yeah...
its HARD to gauge someone fairly. Because it could be just bitching of people who lost.
...
So maybe teammates should be able to downmod own teammembers.
Maybe a system where you can only "up-mod" another person?
Actually how is not that important as long as I know which people are fun to play with and which are not.
Other then that it's important that the system will encourage players to play nice.
So you won't "just" get another rating people like to be good at as it's indicating there "l33tness" not their "niceness".
