wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba) - Page 2

wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Classic game design, maintained to please you...

Moderator: Content Developer

User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by JohannesH »

Yeah only noobs make rockos :roll:
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Tribulex »

storms are cheaper
User avatar
FaerieWithBoots
Posts: 149
Joined: 17 Jun 2009, 13:21

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by FaerieWithBoots »

AK micro ftw!
no more peewees :D :D
AK's E-cost is big though :/
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Tribulex »

FaerieWithBoots wrote:AK micro ftw!
no more peewees :D :D
AK's E-cost is big though :/
thats why ba has adv solar.
User avatar
1v0ry_k1ng
Posts: 4656
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by 1v0ry_k1ng »

I thought that was for when you want to sit at the back and play simbase
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Tribulex »

1v0ry_k1ng wrote:I thought that was for when you want to sit at the back and play simbase
That's its other (more common) use.
HaloDrone
Posts: 5
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 12:16

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by HaloDrone »

why is this thread not a poll? i am disapoint
pintle
Posts: 1763
Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 16:01

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by pintle »

AK wins this thread
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Tribulex »

pintle wrote:AK wins this thread
yeah you bet.
User avatar
Warrior
Posts: 23
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:36

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Warrior »

Most people don't realise it, but warriors are actually the best unit in the game. Therefore, arm is the better option for kbots.
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Jazcash »

Arm is best for T1. Core is best for T2 and T3.
User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by JohannesH »

JAZCASH wrote:Arm is best for T1. Core is best for T2 and T3.
Just the other way around...
User avatar
Warrior
Posts: 23
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:36

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Warrior »

JohannesH wrote:Just the other way around...
no
User avatar
hunterw
Posts: 1838
Joined: 14 May 2006, 12:22

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by hunterw »

t1 its gotta be arm. core aks can kite pewees with great micro but arm has flea and warrior which core have no equivalent, and peewee is better than ak in most situations, especially killing comms.

t2 its more balanced. i really like snipers tho so again id prolly say arm, but core has some cool choices in cans and mortys.

t3 who cares
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by BaNa »

Arm T3 is useless, banthas are laughably easy to paralyze.

Imo core wins out with the bots on all 3 levels:
T1: The units used in 99% of T1 battles are better (ak > pw, thud > hammer, storm > rocko).
T2:
- Core can rush morties much faster than arm can rush their counter (snipers), and morties can really fuck up T1 porc and units
- Freakers can reinforce front lines really well, fucking up any T1 hoard the enemy sends, no arm kbot equiv
- Doms eat t2 porc
- Pyros have epic selfd, with proper micro they are very very deadly
- I prefer zeuses over cans, I concede that to arm
T3:
- The all terrain ability of kargs is a useful niche for taking the enemy unawares, the arm spiders fail at this
- For everything else, krogs are the only choice as they are immune to para, unlike any of the arm T3


all that said, I still play arm cause i doan like cores style :)
User avatar
Tribulex
A.N.T.S. Developer
Posts: 1894
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 21:26

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Tribulex »

d_b wrote:Storms are cheaper than rockos.

Image

Aks have much better dps / cost than warriors, and they are harder to kill with tanks.

Image

I just took my paints and painted the french word "fin"
d_b wrote:
aegis wrote:fleas.
Image

Yes. This is a picture of a morty. And a flea. And shrooms!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I already made it clear core wins....
User avatar
Lolsquad_Steven
Posts: 488
Joined: 27 Jun 2006, 17:55

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Lolsquad_Steven »

Maybe we should try a feew 1v1s on small maps where both players start as kbots, it'd be interesting to see how kbots go against eachother and the strats that come from it all, if i'd guess it'd be a race to who has the most thuds or hammers but you never know.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Neddie »

Last time I tried it ended up being Storms against Hammer/Rocko.
User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by JohannesH »

Compare kbots at t1, where it matters...

Core has thuds & storms which are a whole lot better than the arm equivalents.
Arm has flea which helps alot, both in scouting/raiding and diverting storm rockets and giving los to rocko.
PW/AK, different roles a bit, totally situation dependant which is "better". AK might have more varied uses but then it has to cover some of fleas duty too
Core has better adv solar while arm has cheaper windmills.
If you go air after a while... Do you prefer banshee or bladewing?
Then theres also how they play vs vehicles not just each other. Arm bots often have trouble stopping jeffies with the firing animation of peewee, while ak can snipe jeffy with relative ease (when you catch it up). Both sides die to janus. Core doesnt lose its spotters instantly vs missile trucks like arm.
Oh and arm has beamer.
Etc etc

But well, its map dependant like everything in the end.



And in t3 vanguard > all
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Re: wich bots are better ?arm or core??(ba)

Post by Cabbage »

Arm T1 bots for me, i generally prefer peewee's emg's over ak's laser and lower health, gives a massive advantage if your peewee is on higher ground + more likely to suirvice a chance encounter with an LLT with a small group of peewee's. On the level AK's have a range advantage over peewees ofc but requires alot more micro which is isn't really too much of an issue once initial raiding is over.

I also prefer hammers to thuds simply due to cost, i can live with hte opening animation.

T2 i'd generally go for core, but well defended snipers can easily crush your front line if you can't get at them. EMP spiders mixed in with your attacking force (assuming they havn't had some huge cost increase in recent versions) can also be pretty nifty.

Fav T3 unit is definately vanguard. So long as you arn't stupid and send it off to (slowly) charge through an enemy base by itself. Just target specific high value defensive structures / units and send you assult chappies through. Razorbacks are surprisingly effective at tearing through fightershields, but thats merely a chance observation and is really why you'd build them.. :P
Post Reply

Return to “Balanced Annihilation”