new spore video - Page 2

new spore video

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
jcnossen
Former Engine Dev
Posts: 2440
Joined: 05 Jun 2005, 19:13

Post by jcnossen »

i am sorry not very good english but u are why mean to me i am not mean to u (((((((((?
He refers to tomboms post also in this thread:
anybody who was/is hyped for spore and honestly expects it to be good is an idiot
Procedurally generated content before was limited to static buildings, textures and star systems, without any user input. Spore is the first game that uses user input to generate textures, animations, geometry on such a big scale.

The only problem I think is that so far I've only seen vehicles that resemble normal vehicles, and virtual creatures that resemble real creatures in the way they move. That is probably where the limitations are that we can't see from a video.
If you truly have no limitations, we should have seen really big creatures with 100 legs and other stuff attached... That certainly would make a better marketing impact than a creature that walks almost like a human.
User avatar
Decimator
Posts: 1118
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 04:15

Post by Decimator »

Please don't triple-post, nemppu. The edit button is there for a reason.
User avatar
nemppu
Posts: 417
Joined: 25 Jun 2007, 22:27

Post by nemppu »

jcnossen wrote:
i am sorry not very good english but u are why mean to me i am not mean to u (((((((((?
He refers to tomboms post also in this thread:
anybody who was/is hyped for spore and honestly expects it to be good is an idiot
Procedurally generated content before was limited to static buildings, textures and star systems, without any user input. Spore is the first game that uses user input to generate textures, animations, geometry on such a big scale.

The only problem I think is that so far I've only seen vehicles that resemble normal vehicles, and virtual creatures that resemble real creatures in the way they move. That is probably where the limitations are that we can't see from a video.
If you truly have no limitations, we should have seen really big creatures with 100 legs and other stuff attached... That certainly would make a better marketing impact than a creature that walks almost like a human.
yes i think it is very nice very unique game good fysic generate evolution theory i am looking forward to play))) very nice game in video i wonder when it release so can test if really good or just like u know black&white lol )))))))
User avatar
nemppu
Posts: 417
Joined: 25 Jun 2007, 22:27

Post by nemppu »

Decimator wrote:Please don't triple-post, nemppu. The edit button is there for a reason.
ok sorry
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Post by Machiosabre »

nicely done
User avatar
Sleksa
Posts: 1604
Joined: 04 Feb 2006, 20:58

Post by Sleksa »

first they tell its somekind of awesome evolution simulator . . .

then they make up some cool vids about it . . .

and then they release a SIMS clone . . .



gg wp no re
User avatar
ralphie
Posts: 426
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 08:39

Post by ralphie »

All I see in that game from watching a number of videos, is a series of mini-games that might be fun the first few times, but incredibly dull after that.

I don't think the fact you can do it with funky looking creatures each time will magically make it interesting.
User avatar
Sleksa
Posts: 1604
Joined: 04 Feb 2006, 20:58

Post by Sleksa »

ralphie wrote:
I don't think the fact you can do it with funky looking creatures each time will magically make it interesting.

I don't think the fact you can do it with funky looking creatures each time will magically make it interesting.

I don't think the fact you can do it with funky looking creatures each time will magically make it interesting.


;DDDDDDDDD:D;D;D;D;:DD;DDXD



sorry :(
User avatar
nemppu
Posts: 417
Joined: 25 Jun 2007, 22:27

Post by nemppu »

ralphie wrote:All I see in that game from watching a number of videos, is a series of mini-games that might be fun the first few times, but incredibly dull after that.

I don't think the fact you can do it with funky looking creatures each time will magically make it interesting.
i think it will make fun make many creature u can share with online databise it automatically))))) creative)))))
User avatar
Sleksa
Posts: 1604
Joined: 04 Feb 2006, 20:58

Post by Sleksa »

i will trade my lvl 5 rattata for your lvl 60 *insert best pokeman in the world*


http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=235
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

Wasn't Spore much much colorless before? Looks and sounds like WoW meets SpongeBob on crack in this video.

Also, what's the bulldyke doing there... :P

PS: The whole clip feels like a cheap ad from Apple. clicky
Sleksa wrote:i will trade my lvl 5 rattata for your lvl 60 *insert best pokeman in the world*


http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=235
http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=242
:)
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

In earlier videos, it looked like you carefully created and evolved your creature, with deep-reaching consequences for any choice and emergent behaviors stemming from unique aspects of your species.

In this video, it looks like you maek kewl pokemanz olol.

:(
User avatar
Muzic
Posts: 950
Joined: 09 Aug 2006, 07:08

Post by Muzic »

I like this game D: . Galactic hitler ftw : D
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

FUCK, I liked the way it used to look!

Now it looks bleh.
User avatar
Abokasee
Posts: 222
Joined: 03 Nov 2006, 21:51

Post by Abokasee »

Machiosabre wrote:well it sort of went from this: Image
to this:
Image
The second image is not spore, for 2 reasons (I know your being saracastic)

1: You can't get flying creatures
2: Spore dosnt look like that, but then again you arn't far off :|

I personally perferred the originally graphics, although the UI Could of done with a brush up, now, its the graphics needs look a bit more realistic, like in E3
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

I think that since in spore bacterias are supposed to evolve until galaxy domination, it would be incredible hard to make it if the creatures were so diferent from each other. Like, lets say that in ever stage of the game you could evolve in 10 very diferent ways... that would need 100.000 completly diferent species for the galaxy domination phase... doesnt that sounds too much? :) . Because of that I think that the species will be similar even tough diferent... (Something like: I am a frog and you are a bird, but we both use stuff similar to cars to move around) that doesnt makes me want to play it less tough :)
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

manored wrote:I think that since in spore bacterias are supposed to evolve until galaxy domination, it would be incredible hard to make it if the creatures were so diferent from each other. Like, lets say that in ever stage of the game you could evolve in 10 very diferent ways... that would need 100.000 completly diferent species for the galaxy domination phase... doesnt that sounds too much? :) . Because of that I think that the species will be similar even tough diferent... (Something like: I am a frog and you are a bird, but we both use stuff similar to cars to move around) that doesnt makes me want to play it less tough :)
But wasn't the whole point of Spore that it wasn't based off a pre-programmed tree of evolutionary possibilities, but based on algorithms to dynamically determine what the effects of a certain change or development are within the context of a given system?

If it is tree-based then it's just an expensive, ugly version of SimEarth, ne?
User avatar
Muzic
Posts: 950
Joined: 09 Aug 2006, 07:08

Post by Muzic »

Felix the Cat wrote:
manored wrote:I think that since in spore bacterias are supposed to evolve until galaxy domination, it would be incredible hard to make it if the creatures were so diferent from each other. Like, lets say that in ever stage of the game you could evolve in 10 very diferent ways... that would need 100.000 completly diferent species for the galaxy domination phase... doesnt that sounds too much? :) . Because of that I think that the species will be similar even tough diferent... (Something like: I am a frog and you are a bird, but we both use stuff similar to cars to move around) that doesnt makes me want to play it less tough :)
But wasn't the whole point of Spore that it wasn't based off a pre-programmed tree of evolutionary possibilities, but based on algorithms to dynamically determine what the effects of a certain change or development are within the context of a given system?

If it is tree-based then it's just an expensive, ugly version of SimEarth, ne?
+ the game automatically downloads other players speicies and puts them in your galaxy. Making it somewhat massive 'multi'player. If someone fucks your capital planet in another game, you get a report of how many people decided to ally or destroy your planet.

I look how spore looks now, its more bright and vivid and more lively. The previous or first version looked bleaker without that much color.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

Muzic wrote:Making it somewhat massive 'multi'player. If someone fucks your capital planet in another game, you get a report of how many people decided to ally or destroy your planet.
Im pretty sure right from the beginning they've been saying that 'multiplayer' wont be synced at all and it will just populate planets with other people's creatures
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

Muzic wrote:I look how spore looks now, its more bright and vivid and more lively. The previous or first version looked bleaker without that much color.
It's bright, vivid, and lively in the same sense that "Teletubbies" is bright, vivid, and lively.

It needs to be bright, vivid, and lively without looking like it's designed for players with IQs in the 50s.
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”