Building new computer - what OS? - Page 2

Building new computer - what OS?

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Muzic
Posts: 950
Joined: 09 Aug 2006, 07:08

Post by Muzic »

Wiiiittchh : O!!

Roger, you could go ahead and get Vista when you play games and then have Ubuntu for everything else. Though i've never used linux and I haven't thought about it becuase it probably requires abit of your own configuring and customization for it to feel 'homey'. You should get Vista though becuase its time for us to move on : P.

DirectX10 isn't something to worry about for now, and when games come out that needs directx10 hardware cause all the effects are DX10, there will probably be a new series of cards leaving the 8800's a year old.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

RogerN wrote:Thanks for the suggestions, guys. Looks like I'm going with XP Home. It'd be nice to get Pro, but I don't see the extra cost as being worth the benefits (and no, I don't want to steal it :)).

Ubuntu might be interesting to try, but I don't have a practical need for it ATM since Windows is a must-have for my gaming obsession anyway. I can't think of anything I'd need Ubuntu for off the top of my head. Just in case, I do have a live linux distro on a CD around here somewhere...

EDIT: Ironically, the reason I need to upgrade is because the last time I built a PC I opted to go with Win2k instead of XP. Now I can't install the latest DirectX SDK 'cuz it's XP-Only. I'm afraid I'm making the same mistake all over again by not going with Vista... but Vista performance is just too crap-tastic to consider at this point :(
Ubuntu boots in about a third of the time XP does... that's one advantage... Security is like 100% better, file management is incredibly easy in comparison. General application lag is reduced. Process logging, you can see when each process has started, what security levels it has, where it was started from, no more of this "Gee, I wonder what this WinMNTdix8 process came from/what it does?". General applications run faster, IE webbrowsing, office, spreadsheets, whatever, they found ways around most of the windows standard "take forever to load" bugs. Much more UI optionality and control than the windows desktop... and like, some other stuff.

Generally speaking, when you've used a reasonable bit of lunix, you really feel begrudged when you have to go back and do stuff on windows, because it's just generally no where near as nice, smooth, quick, and clean.
User avatar
genblood
Posts: 862
Joined: 19 Jan 2005, 03:37

Post by genblood »

You should stay away from Windows XP Home ... It will only
see the processor as a single processor. You are better of
getting Windows XP Pro w/sp2. 32b version. The 64 bit version
allows for more memory, but drivers are still issues. The Apps
are still another issue too.

I'm not big on dual boot systems ... :shock:

I have 3 windows pcs and a Gentoo system ...

I prefer Gentoo for my linux distro ...


Also, I prefer AMD processors over Intel ... :lol:


On the graphics front ATI or Nvidia for windows system
and Nvidia for linux distros ... ATI still behind on driver support
for linux, but trying to resolve that issue ..
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

genblood wrote:You should stay away from Windows XP Home ... It will only
see the processor as a single processor.
Not sure if i misunderstood you here, but im running home, and my processah works fine(dual core)
Lippy
Posts: 327
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 00:24

Post by Lippy »

Windows Home is fine; unlike professional it can only use 1 cpu (professional can take 2) but that only applies to physical cpus; therefore it could be a dual-core or a quad-core.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

install dos and play the heck out of commander keen
Lippy
Posts: 327
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 00:24

Post by Lippy »

Zpock wrote:(Man would it be sweet irony if when opengl uses all the fancy stuff on "dx10" cards, on XP/linux/whatever, everyone use this for writing games, and the whole thing backfires on microsoft nukeing dx10 and vista, instead of making everyone get vista and screw opengl like MS wanted.)
Opengl 3.0: http://www.opengl.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultim ... 015351;p=0
User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Post by clericvash »

ubuntu all the way!

i plan to get a new machine sometime this year hopefully, with it i will have ubuntu, and no fricken windows :)
User avatar
REVENGE
Posts: 2382
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 06:13

Post by REVENGE »

Lippy wrote:
Zpock wrote:(Man would it be sweet irony if when opengl uses all the fancy stuff on "dx10" cards, on XP/linux/whatever, everyone use this for writing games, and the whole thing backfires on microsoft nukeing dx10 and vista, instead of making everyone get vista and screw opengl like MS wanted.)
Opengl 3.0: http://www.opengl.org/cgi-bin/ubbultima ... 015351;p=0
Yeah, well unfortunately Microsoft will still be winning the standards war being one step ahead of Opengl 3.0 with the impending release of DX 10.1.

Why do I say unfortunately? Because on paper, the DX 10 generation will be Orphanware less than a year after the final implementation [via Vista] was released. And no, migrating to DX 10.1 isn't going to be a remotely easy task.

What sortof game developers would dev up to 10.1? Who knows, but they must be out of their mind.
User avatar
RogerN
Posts: 238
Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 23:29

Post by RogerN »

Well I downloaded the latest Ubuntu ISO yesterday. We'll see how this dual-booting thing goes... parts should arrive on Tuesday.
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

Ive had hell with getting my nvidia drivers working properly though.
This is what worked for me
Now I've spent all day fiddling with beryl, trying everything out :)
imbaczek
Posts: 3629
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 16:19

Post by imbaczek »

beryl is:
1) outdated - it's being merged with compiz, you're better off trying that
2) dangerous to productivity - users are known to be doing nothing but staring at wobbling windows for a good amount of time :P
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

Ishach wrote:install dos and play the heck out of commander keen
I did that with one of my new Damn Small boxes. First I wiped it using DSL, then I ran it under DOS and played some old classics...

Then I installed Damn Small Linux.
User avatar
Relative
Posts: 1371
Joined: 15 Oct 2006, 13:17

Post by Relative »

Comp1337 wrote:Ive had hell with getting my nvidia drivers working properly though.
This is what worked for me
Now I've spent all day fiddling with beryl, trying everything out :)
For nvidia drivers you should check out this:

http://albertomilone.com/nvidia_scripts1.html
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

Relative wrote:
Comp1337 wrote:Ive had hell with getting my nvidia drivers working properly though.
This is what worked for me
Now I've spent all day fiddling with beryl, trying everything out :)
For nvidia drivers you should check out this:

http://albertomilone.com/nvidia_scripts1.html
Have it, didn't work :(
) dangerous to productivity - users are known to be doing nothing but staring at wobbling windows for a good amount of time
I know that feeling

*Wobble wobble*
EDIT: Oh my god
I can bend a maximized window
this is awesome
tombom
Posts: 1933
Joined: 18 Dec 2005, 20:21

Post by tombom »

if you use your computer almost completely for playing games it's silly switching to linux imo. linux has a lot of cool stuff about it but most of the time switching just isn't worthwhile.

btw rogern are you the same guy on the space empires 5 forums
User avatar
RogerN
Posts: 238
Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 23:29

Post by RogerN »

btw rogern are you the same guy on the space empires 5 forums
Yep :) Amazing... I didn't think anyone else played that game.
User avatar
iamacup
Posts: 987
Joined: 26 Jun 2006, 20:43

Post by iamacup »

i have the 6000 on vista ultimate x64 works like a charm.

(and the OEM costs 30 quid more than XP so why the f not.)
User avatar
Sleksa
Posts: 1604
Joined: 04 Feb 2006, 20:58

Post by Sleksa »

RogerN wrote:
btw rogern are you the same guy on the space empires 5 forums
Yep :) Amazing... I didn't think anyone else played that game.



. .. THERES SPACE EMPIRES 5????+
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

I got space empires 5 like a week ago and after it taking a good 40minutes before I had started my empire and got half way through designing one vehicle I decided there was no way I would have the patience to play it any more.


That and it runs at 6fps on my very modern computer :S
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”