Absolute Annihilation 2.11 - Page 63

Absolute Annihilation 2.11

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

Up the Commander's weight, problem solved.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Noooo, please, I like commander nukes halfway across an 8x8 map or so...
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

MR.D wrote:Up the Commander's weight, problem solved.
That's a fine idea.
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

NO!! dont up his weight, its so funny when he goes flying, best results come from exploding a moho geo right next to him hehe
It should be left as is, I mean a nuke should throw stuff everywhere anyway and the comedy value is just so high, when is it not funny to see the enemy comm backflipping across the map? :lol:
User avatar
knorke
Posts: 7971
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 01:02

Post by knorke »

Image
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

Its only funny if its not your commander...
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

LOL knorke ^^

Its still funny if its your own commander, some people who play this game can accept losing and laugh about it some people cant.
Id place myself in the former.

anyway if a nuke hits a comm it he should go flying! its a nuke!
User avatar
ginekolog
Posts: 837
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 13:49

Post by ginekolog »

flying com is silly. Comm > nuke

comm = walking nuke with integrated dgun --> mass is big
User avatar
Exit69
Posts: 63
Joined: 24 Jun 2006, 19:21

A bug?

Post by Exit69 »

Con ships are able to build floating radars on land...
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

Im not gonna argue about this, its stupid, a nuke is a nuke and as far as im aware theyre pretty powerful.
hollowsoul
Posts: 665
Joined: 06 Jun 2006, 19:49

Post by hollowsoul »

Semi -- BUG REPORT
Why working on pygtk app for linux
Noticed this

Unitsync is unable to extract unit info from
AASA211.sdz

I got no idea why this is
Other ones are ok & other mods
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

i agree with steve on this nuke thing, i mean, getting hit in the face with a several megaton nuclear blast is bound to hurt, it's not the same as getting hit with a massless laser. :P

And they only go flying miles if tehy're fairly close to the epicentre, around there edges they just tend to topple over and seek revenge :P

Was a game yesterday where an enemy com git hit by a nuke, he flew forewards into a bertha and blew up - was great :o
User avatar
krogothe
AI Developer
Posts: 1050
Joined: 14 Nov 2005, 17:07

Post by krogothe »

Anyone else think that the metal amount on comm wrecks is retarded due to the fact that it takes years to reclaim it and requires so much storage?
I find myself annoyed at having to manually stop a group of reclaimers that get "stuck" in a comm wreck. Sure, i can build storage en masse and wait two hours till it reclaims. Sure, i keep getting absolutely clueless noobs who say send more/more powerful reclaimers, when it doesnt affect the reclaim time. Sure, the comm looks expensive, but wouldnt it be nice if it only gave say around 2-3k m so it is actually useful early game where comm bombs are most destructive?
Last edited by krogothe on 17 Jul 2006, 14:41, edited 1 time in total.
CautionToTheWind
Posts: 272
Joined: 30 May 2006, 17:06

Post by CautionToTheWind »

Hi Caydr,

I made a thread about the CORE tactical nukes. There were some replies on both sides of the issue but i think there is common ground in that ARM doesn't have an equivalent weapon, and that there is no defense other than destroying the tacnuke launcher, which has longer range than all other frontline weapons.

Please consider the issue.

http://taspring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=6025
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

For the nuke tossing I'd say there should be an option to make a unit invulnerable to falling damage. Having the com die on a single nuke hit is too dangerous on com ends game. There's a reason nukes do less damage to coms even in OTA.

krogothe: Wait, I always send in the resurrectors...

Caution: I think the proper response is a Bertha.
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

The arms emp launcher will kick ass when the cumalative paralyse time is fixed, Ive been tring it recently, its crap for hitting moving stuff obviously but its got a big aoe, a couple of hits on a players frontline will render it useless for over 30 seconds with the cumalative paralyse times, I think they'll be useful, they also have a huge range too.
Obviuosly its not a direct counter core tac nuke but those things take a long ime to build and recharge and theres loads of ways to take them out, zippers bombers pyros sctuttles brawlers berthas blah blah blah

oh and I agree with krog on the comm thing, maybe 4 thousand metal would be good.
Last edited by BigSteve on 17 Jul 2006, 14:54, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
krogothe
AI Developer
Posts: 1050
Joined: 14 Nov 2005, 17:07

Post by krogothe »

Changing the comms metal cost wont change ressurection time, only making reclaiming more viable
User avatar
Min3mat
Posts: 3455
Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 20:19

Post by Min3mat »

a nice feature would be a more customisable reclaim system, eg landat20 style so reclaimbefore 5k /10k /15k
so you click on it alone and it will do it
but if you do a area reclaim it wont reclaim the corpses above that level
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

Personally, I'd like the comm to be able to survive a nuclear blast. It's important for game ends that the comm be hard to kill with a single shot. Most mods (including OTA) support this approach. I mean, I love the shockwaves knocking things around, but if it makes the comm weaker then it should be then somehting is wrong.

One game i played, the comm was knocked clear to the edge of the map. Even the ctrl-C command got confused.

In general though, the impact stuff causes a lot of annoying problems. Ever seen an enemy rocko get a peeper's tour of your base because of a good hit with a plasma cannon? Sure, he dies when he lands, but until then the enemy gets a lot of recon info. I just wish that flakkers and anti-swarmers would shoot at ground units knocked airborne.

min3mat: I'd just rather that units avoid auto-reclaiming anything that you can't store at least half of. Then they'd only reclaim a comm if you've got a metric tonne of storage which lies mostly-empty.
User avatar
Mr.Frumious
Posts: 139
Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 17:47

Post by Mr.Frumious »

BigSteve wrote:The arms emp launcher will kick ass when the cumalative paralyse time is fixed, Ive been tring it recently, its crap for hitting moving stuff obviously but its got a big aoe, a couple of hits on a players frontline will render it useless for over 30 seconds with the cumalative paralyse times, I think they'll be useful, they also have a huge range too.
Obviuosly its not a direct counter core tac nuke but those things take a long ime to build and recharge and theres loads of ways to take them out, zippers bombers pyros sctuttles brawlers berthas blah blah blah

oh and I agree with krog on the comm thing, maybe 4 thousand metal would be good.
Even with that feature, they'd still be minimally useful. I've recently tried using them - they just don't seem effective. I tried using an EMP against a Doomsday. Just a single missile - it wasn't a direct hit, but a close one. The Doomsday wasn't even stunned for a second. Comparatively speaking, that's much less useful.
Locked

Return to “Game Releases”