In 20 years, we can all say we knew the guy (however remotely) who solved the mysteries of mind!

Moderator: Moderators
My brain wasn't one of the ones compared directly in that study actually.SwiftSpear wrote:Basically they compared lord matt's brain to a chimp and found only one major difference.
This is purely an anatomical study, looking into how the brain is physically connected, therefore there is no need for a task. The non-human primates were either anesthetized, or brains of those who had died earlier were scanned. About citations, I'm sure they will come, but people have to cite your paper in their work, and given the length of time it takes to get a paper published, they will probably start increasing in a few months.PicassoCT wrote: Well i guessed you had to get the Chimp in one of those http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_resonance_imaging
-and have him in a testsituation that the animal could solve just like a human would. Or did i missunderstood something here ?
You could always read the paper... Matt said it was published in that medicine dealio... I mean, normally only doctors read those, but peer reviewed papers are actually really good reading if you're interested in sciency stuff.Erom wrote:Showed this thread to my GF, who's working on language and cognition in grad school... she said it was interesting stuff, and she would know much more about it than I would, so grats.