Vista SP1 will fix everything and unpregnant your GF
Moderator: Moderators
Vista SP1 will fix everything and unpregnant your GF
Not really. Actually it does nothing.
But in other news, XP's new service pack increases performance by as much as 10%,
roflcopterskates.
But in other news, XP's new service pack increases performance by as much as 10%,
roflcopterskates.
Last edited by Caydr on 29 Nov 2007, 20:07, edited 1 time in total.
I've explained my unholy obsession SO many times... 

For starters, XP does things that Windows 98 does not.AF wrote:I'm more bothered by this unholy obsession with Vista caydr has. If XP is so great why bother moaning about vista to begin with, especially when the 98 versus XP stats look even bleaker.
Last edited by Caydr on 29 Nov 2007, 20:08, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: 28 Jan 2005, 18:15
Support? I haven't downloaded a security update in like 3 years. I think all of us here are more irritated by the "DX10 isn't possible! ... We just said so, dammit!" nonsense.Tobi wrote:IMHO the only reason to upgrade is because Microsoft pushes it down your throat by, at some time, stopping to support XP. (And, at this time already, forcing Vista to be shipped with most consumer PCs.
- clumsy_culhane
- Posts: 370
- Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 10:27
iirc Dx10 is not able to run on XP because of major API differences in the actual Windows. like i think in Vista the graphics driver runs separately to the o/s, so if the graphics driver crashes, the o/s tells the driver to reboot but you don't actually have to reboot the whole system. (this actually seems to work, it has happened when the graphics crashed, the graphics driver restarted after around 10 secs and i didn't lost my work :D)
Indeed udner XP when your gfx driver crashes you get a BSOD.
Under vista the screen pauses for a sec and a balloon popup appears saying the driver didn't respond had has been reset. Vista graphics memory si also virtualized unlike XP allowing multiple full screen directx and opengl programs to run at once.
What really puzzles me caydr is that you complain that Vista is so slow yet when we ask you about the performance you get in games, you say you get good frame rates.
Argh, yes opengl drivers for Vista under nvidia are quite good now. I haven't had a TDR crash on my main machine running spring in quite a while now. Sadly my main PC is in my room, and my room's very cold during the winter, so for the moment I don't want frostbite. Sadly ATI drivers however are stuck in the stoneage. ATI OGL drivers have yet to even reach the state the nvidia drivers where in on the day Vista was officially released.
Under vista the screen pauses for a sec and a balloon popup appears saying the driver didn't respond had has been reset. Vista graphics memory si also virtualized unlike XP allowing multiple full screen directx and opengl programs to run at once.
What really puzzles me caydr is that you complain that Vista is so slow yet when we ask you about the performance you get in games, you say you get good frame rates.
Argh, yes opengl drivers for Vista under nvidia are quite good now. I haven't had a TDR crash on my main machine running spring in quite a while now. Sadly my main PC is in my room, and my room's very cold during the winter, so for the moment I don't want frostbite. Sadly ATI drivers however are stuck in the stoneage. ATI OGL drivers have yet to even reach the state the nvidia drivers where in on the day Vista was officially released.