What's your "mental" stereotype? - Page 3

What's your "mental" stereotype?

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie » 24 Apr 2007, 04:11

Someone needs to check up on the definition of a sociopath.
0 x

User avatar
LathanStanley
Posts: 1429
Joined: 20 Jun 2005, 05:16

Post by LathanStanley » 24 Apr 2007, 04:16

neddiedrow wrote:Someone needs to check up on the definition of a sociopath.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... =sociopath
0 x

User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle » 24 Apr 2007, 11:05

The fifth definition is the most appealing one.
0 x

User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf » 24 Apr 2007, 13:31

lawl, I know thats gotta be wrong.
0 x

User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie » 25 Apr 2007, 05:34

Urbandictionary? Heh. Try a little more legit source.
0 x

SpikedHelmet
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1945
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 08:25

Post by SpikedHelmet » 25 Apr 2007, 09:10

Especially considering that fucking thing is filled with the most rudimentary grammar mistakes.
0 x

User avatar
LathanStanley
Posts: 1429
Joined: 20 Jun 2005, 05:16

Post by LathanStanley » 25 Apr 2007, 09:12

neddiedrow wrote:Urbandictionary? Heh. Try a little more legit source.
give me the definition of legitimate, then, apply it to your "legitimate" source, then apply it to Urbandictionary, you might be suprised at the correlation between the two.


legitimate:
not spurious or unjustified; genuine

spurious:
not genuine, authentic, or true; not from the claimed, pretended, or proper source; counterfeit.

all the other parts are circular references...

thus, if something is "NOT couterfit, it is authentic, or is claimed by the knowing party," then it IS legitimate.

Thus, when it is pubically voted upon by the community, it is known BY the community as such, is truth, and not falsified, and therefore is legitimate and genuine.

I could argue this all day. You don't mean "legitimate" or "reputible"... you mean "documented in writing" source...

well, reality check.

the internet is the modern book.

get used to it, its here to stay.
Last edited by LathanStanley on 25 Apr 2007, 09:22, edited 2 times in total.
0 x

tombom
Posts: 1933
Joined: 18 Dec 2005, 20:21

Post by tombom » 25 Apr 2007, 09:13

SpikedHelmet wrote:Especially considering that fucking thing is filled with the most rudimentary grammar mistakes.
Yeah, it's not a good source at all. I mean all the entries are user submitted!

Try Wikipedia.
0 x

raikitsune
Posts: 241
Joined: 09 Aug 2005, 15:41

Post by raikitsune » 25 Apr 2007, 14:21

closest i got to being stereotyped ever was when i was called "the devils advocate." Honestly I'll argue any side if no one else is arguing it just for the hell of it.

At school well lets see i was mostly with the geekish group but i listened to hiphop, dance, trance, classical, rock etc etc also i was very good freinds with the "ghetto" people in the year while maintaining a good relationship with the "popular" side of the year. My main defining fature was knowing too much about the military and my "long hair rights" push. (which won and now the school i sued to go too has to allow boys with long hair as well as girls, however all the boys with long hair there now look like arses and i wish i'd never done it ├âÔÇÜ├é┬¼_├âÔÇÜ├é┬¼)
0 x

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”