Inapropriate wiki edit.

Inapropriate wiki edit.

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

http://spring.clan-sy.com/wiki/Mods

What the fuck is this shit? who gave him the write to go and post a LEGAL warning in the mod descriptions. That was out of line IMO and I am doing my part to report this.
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Machiosabre »

man, I thought the wiki would have been thrown away by now
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

No, it is still needed and as the documentation source for the spring player base these sort of edits are out of line.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6240
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by FLOZi »

User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

yes, After the new site is up I am going to be going through updating and organizing the wiki. Several tags are missing and I have some tips I want to put inside of the wiki.
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Machiosabre »

if you want to keep it better you might want to stop anyone other than devs and modders and handpicked people from posting.

I remember when Emmanuel got into the wiki :D
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

I would revert his edit but I wanted to first draw attention to it. IMO this is the same as vandalism to me.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by rattle »

He vandalised quite a few pages... you can probably undo all of his changes without investigating them. :P
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

I probably could. I can see his history and do all the janitorial work but I do not want to sacrifice all my time wiping up all the bullshit is put on the wiki, :\
User avatar
Sleksa
Posts: 1604
Joined: 04 Feb 2006, 20:58

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Sleksa »

i wonder why spiderpack, ota revamp and utasp pack were left out.

Smells like a CONSPIRACY!
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Neddie »

The funniest thing is that everything else has a legal status as well. For instance, E&E is held by Fang. S44 is CC:SA?
User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by clericvash »

I don't really see whats wrong with it, care to explain?
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

The modifications have been reverted... which means you have to go in history to see them. This sort of thing attaches a stigma to the projects in question. It puts a bad image to the projects. Neddie has corrected it.
User avatar
HeavyLancer
Posts: 421
Joined: 19 May 2007, 09:28

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by HeavyLancer »

I fixed up the games page a little bit more, and got rid of some of the emmanuel shit in the mods category.

Also, I suggest that we get rid of the old mods page and just use the games page. The games page lists all of the popular mods, and the mods category can be used to house all of the older mods pages.
User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by clericvash »

I don't see why putting a "tm" next to mods which are pretty much illegal to have up is such a thing to get so pissed off over.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

is gundam illegal to have? no.
User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by clericvash »

Well you didn't say yours had a "tm" by it, i mean for the ta mods, since they all contain copyrighted content, people should be properly told about it.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by smoth »

There is no TM on the TA mod and there is no reason to bring all of that into the wiki. Just let the players see the mods. No reason to put all the community drama on the players, they have to deal with main as it is.
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Machiosabre »

clericvash wrote:excuse me miss, you forgot to give us homework, you said we had homework!
User avatar
LordMatt
Posts: 3393
Joined: 15 May 2005, 04:26

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by LordMatt »

Machiosabre wrote:
clericvash wrote:excuse me miss, you forgot to give us homework, you said we had homework!
+1
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”