Spring RTS Engine

Try to reduce the number of the polygons.You can use it in another place.

I love the battleship hull!

Impossible to forget it!!!!!:mrgreen:
vonGratz

IMHO re-scale needs a compromise with good sense and Spring limitations, not would be necessary a full scale modification. Of course nothing like OTA ships .smaller than some mobile land units. About maps I totally agreed with Simbad because Spring dont have , for while, maps suitable for huge air/n...

There was a naval warfare game being developed, but I haven't heard anything about it for a long time. I think that is my BattleFleet, firstly launched as TA-BattleFleet, but trough the time with so several modifications that Ive resolved start a new from the scratch.I still dont give up, but Im in...

+1 for Rattle wolf

Not sure if this has been posted before. I know VonGratz already knows about this. http://www.tauniverse.com/forum/showthread.php?s=c3bb1b6932b3909a121af04c4cb0b9cf&t=35991&page=26 In my opinion, some of the best 3do model sets we'll ever see. . :lol: :lol: :lol: YES, Im a fan, and I think ...

Can i hope you ALL delete NOW all mods taking stuffs from TA without asking before ? Following this line, practically NONE will be delected :lol: :lol: :lol: , because its one of the rules Spring and TA community accept, respect, and utilizes, also being a way to avoid conflicts like this, and, au ...

At least with Spring someone will actually see your models... BUT RIGHT, YOU'RE FUCKING RIGHT, HE SHOULDN'T HAVE STOLEN THE MODELS IN THE FIRST PLACE. DUMBASS. In my case, the ~ 900 to 1000 downloads of TA-BattleFleet from FileUniverse + the old Spring files site (Its a good underdog mod :lol: :lol...

Thanks

monkerl wrote: I really don't know, how Lemmi obtained the models of a mod not yet released without the modellers knowledge, but thats another issue.
.

From Beta releases of course, as written above...

Did you have noted the head movement?

neddiedrow wrote:All depends on how you organize the UV map.

Did it means good scale in that pieces ?

A question:
Did the UVMapping texturization is good for large areas as the parts of the deck of this carrier for example?
Or it need to be subdivided?

Really I dont known it until now, but you answered my next question before I do it as Ive read something and have this doubt
This forum is amazing
Thanks

Hoi,
I think that I understood Without loose any angle (one or two not necessary )
Better?

No way Smoth , 3do texes never more !!!!! To texture a carrier with 3dos would be an insanity and also the distortion could kill the entirely work.
Im learning UVMapping....
Until this week the score was 10 UVMapping x 0 myself, but finally I made a goal

Yes!I will upload and will PM to you.
Thanks
vonGratz

Yes, I have a trouble here, particularly in the plane is very necessary to reduce half of the polygons without miss the shape.I think the texes will simplify the needs for forms also.

MidKnight wrote:YES!
I love the rising cylinders! keep them!

+1
Very creative.

A mini-sub submarine carrier for the Atlanteans



and also a new fighter