Spring RTS Engine

> Maybe it can all go in separated page? what you think? Sorry to take so long to get back to you on this, and the current formatting, with the table off to this side looks great, so stick with that I reckon. > What you are really missing, and is effectively missing, is the attack zone Yep - I think...

> so added it, but uikeys are pretty self explanatory. The part that I didn't find self-explanatory was how to combine meta keys + letter or mouse + letter (thanks to your additions I now understand you can't), and I couldn't see a list of the possible actions. I've taken a rough cut of the possible...

Thank you all for your great comments and feedback. I've tried to incorporate as much as possible into the page, and to tighten it up based on what you have said: http://nickj.org/index.php?title=Review_of_TA_Spring&diff=&oldid=1964 Please understand that it's not my intention to nag, or to ...

Its horribly formatted How would you prefer it be formatted? Be specific. lacks any sense of structur and flow ... pretentiously called a "review" Happy to rename it. How about: "a list of UI things that suck in TA:Spring"? and fails to "get" even basic concepts. And e...

[Sheekel wrote]: > It's beta... ... hence the specific suggestions for the beta. > Anyway, i doubt anyone is going to bother changing a bunch of > source because your girlfriend accidentally blew up her > commander once. Oh. Ok. I had assumed the general aim here was to get people to like and play T...

Hi All, I've just posted a review of TA Spring 0.70b3 on the web at: http://nickj.org/Review_of_TA_Spring I've especially concentrated on the User-Interface, since that is the area that interests me the most, and have tried to make specific and constructive suggestions for things that would improve ...