My suggestion would be to add a script controllable tag that makes a unit not automatically targetted. They could still potentially be targetted manually.
This could be for a few units that are disguised as wreckage. I think that this would add a strategic option for surprise.
Search found 8 matches
- 08 May 2006, 15:28
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Another idea
- Replies: 1
- Views: 561
- 25 Apr 2006, 18:11
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Crawling bomb idea
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1018
Crawling bomb idea
My idea is to make crawling bombs automatically charge at a unit within LOS when set to fire at will. Do you think this is a good idea or a bad idea? This could be done with a new fbi tag, so that units with short range weapons, like close combat units will try to close down the distance if it is in...
- 24 Apr 2006, 20:10
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Does Spring need TA installed? I dont think so.
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3124
- 03 Mar 2006, 00:55
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: new GUI, when?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2729
- 26 Jan 2006, 01:33
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2536
The only problem with it is that it's missing a midsection. It was designed strongly with OTA in mind, meaning that anything you can't see in OTA is not there. It basically has no torso, just a big gaping hole. Just ask the guys at TAU to see if they can remodel it. Quite a few people are still mak...
- 24 Jan 2006, 00:56
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2536
- 15 Jun 2005, 13:14
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: TO ANYONE AT FILEUNIVERSE.COM
- Replies: 45
- Views: 4768
- 03 May 2005, 16:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Theme Song
- Replies: 55
- Views: 9918