Search found 7 matches
- 19 Jun 2011, 06:54
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Re: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
The destroyer isn't a balance change, and I didn't mean it as such. The balance changes are regarding the T3 units, for which I don't have a very strong argument as of now. The destroyer is about gameplay, as are the other small things that I mentioned. More capable units make for less interesting g...
- 17 Jun 2011, 07:15
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Re: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
The destroyer was not that well-equipped in the original game. It was good at one thing: lobbing shells from far away. (And the ability to go against submarines, but that's not something that qualifies for "well-equipped" in my opinion.) The battleship, on the other hand, was well-equipped...
- 15 Jun 2011, 04:39
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Re: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
Thanks for the feedback, all. Two hours were not without fighting. There were raids, just not before each base was strong enough to easily fend them off. My issues don't come up in competitive games, yes, but perhaps it would be worth fixing them for when this game is not played competitively? For o...
- 14 Jun 2011, 08:58
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Re: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
In a recent 2+ hour game :shock: I think you've taken a wrong turn somewhere... you might want to try OpenTTD instead... Lol.. Somehow, the logic worked out like this: 1. Want big, epic battles. 2. Assume that you need big, strong bases and big, strong armies and a big map. 3. Play on big map, buil...
- 14 Jun 2011, 08:54
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Re: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
Thanks Steven. To be honest, my very post should give me away as a player who is not very experienced, since I play slow and develop fairly slow (though I've definitely been working on this). Any experienced player should be able to beat me before I'm able to tech-up in the way that I described. So ...
- 14 Jun 2011, 04:25
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Suggestion about default widgets list
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1526
Re: Suggestion about default widgets list
I used "auto heal, reclaim, repair" for a bit, then removed it. As the game goes and and you have more resources, it's great, but towards the beginning, when I tend to have more construction units than the resources that they can use up, I run into resource problems because they keep helpi...
- 14 Jun 2011, 04:20
- Forum: Balanced Annihilation
- Topic: Core Executioner Minor Change Request
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4147
Core Executioner Minor Change Request
Just requesting a minor change. The Core Executioner was personally my favorite ship in the original TA (longest range cannon of all Core ships, if I recall correctly). I'm a bit bummed out to see the cannon replaced with a laser. Any chance this could be undone? And a small rant, in case anybody wi...