View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0005734 | Spring engine | General | public | 2017-08-29 10:12 | 2017-08-31 23:40 | ||||||||
Reporter | abma | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | |||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||||||
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Product Version | 103.0 +git | ||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0005734: unitsync test fails when duplicate file exists | ||||||||||||
Description | /home/abma/dev/spring/develop/test/unitsync/testUnitSync.cpp(279): error: in "UnitSync": XTA 9.745: 84!=85 | ||||||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | copy ba-V9.54.sdz to ba-V9.54-test.sdz start test/test_UnitSync | ||||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
Checked infolog.txt for Errors | |||||||||||||
Attached Files |
|
Notes | |
Kloot (developer) 2017-08-29 12:27 Last edited: 2017-08-29 12:30 |
an explicit check that fails if duplicate archives are present seems like it should be part of the UT. |
abma (administrator) 2017-08-31 23:40 |
aw, wasn't meant as release blocker as its no regression. wrt the ut: i'm not sure if a duplicate name should be allowed: isn't unitsync meant to fetch info about all available archives in the datadirs? this includes duplicates as well?! or should it hide duplicates? |