| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005734 | Spring engine | General | public | 2017-08-29 10:12 | 2017-08-31 23:40 | ||||||||
| Reporter | abma | ||||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||||||
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
| Product Version | 103.0 +git | ||||||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
| Summary | 0005734: unitsync test fails when duplicate file exists | ||||||||||||
| Description | /home/abma/dev/spring/develop/test/unitsync/testUnitSync.cpp(279): error: in "UnitSync": XTA 9.745: 84!=85 | ||||||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | copy ba-V9.54.sdz to ba-V9.54-test.sdz start test/test_UnitSync | ||||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
| Checked infolog.txt for Errors | |||||||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
| Notes |
|
|
Kloot (developer) 2017-08-29 12:27 Last edited: 2017-08-29 12:30 |
an explicit check that fails if duplicate archives are present seems like it should be part of the UT. |
|
abma (administrator) 2017-08-31 23:40 |
aw, wasn't meant as release blocker as its no regression. wrt the ut: i'm not sure if a duplicate name should be allowed: isn't unitsync meant to fetch info about all available archives in the datadirs? this includes duplicates as well?! or should it hide duplicates? |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-29 10:12 | abma | New Issue | |
| 2017-08-29 12:27 | Kloot | Note Added: 0018298 | |
| 2017-08-29 12:30 | Kloot | Note Edited: 0018298 | View Revisions |
| 2017-08-31 23:36 | abma | Target Version | 104.0 => |
| 2017-08-31 23:40 | abma | Note Added: 0018319 | |
| Issue History |