View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0004065 | Spring engine | AI | public | 2013-10-15 18:00 | 2013-11-30 15:32 | ||||
Reporter | msafwan | ||||||||
Assigned To | Kloot | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
Product Version | 94.1.1+git | ||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0004065: alt + line_attack or alt+shift+attack feature is lost (since Spring 92) | ||||||||
Description | This is how we could ideally use alt+shift+attack (or alt+line_attack) feature: 1) select a turret (like a big bertha), 2) alt+shift+attack ground to hit, 3) then wait until unit shoot each location 1 by 1. This feature existed in Spring 91, except that it doesn't wait for slow-reload weapon (still not ideal). This feature seems to be totally non-functioning after Spring 92 (still non-operation in Spring 94.1.1-1370-g3c9a5e7 ) where it now behave like regular shift+attack queue. | ||||||||
Tags | attack modifier, unit ai | ||||||||
Checked infolog.txt for Errors | |||||||||
Attached Files |
|
![]() |
|
msafwan (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:09 Last edited: 2013-10-15 18:26 |
I think this http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=3264 probably related. The feature seems to be ideal in Spring 89 (shoot at least once for each point in queue) |
silentwings (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:24 |
Imo this should be implemented with lua and not by engine |
Google_Frog (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:28 |
I'm fairly sure this can already be done with command fire. Also the behaviour in 91.0 was a bug. |
msafwan (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:32 Last edited: 2013-10-15 18:41 |
Google_Frog , the report actually remove the feature altogether instead of it being fixed. :( I just tried on Spring 89, it didn't cancel the attack-order if unit haven't yet attacked that attack-order in queue. (your report was: in Spring 91 it was removing the attack-order every ~half-second) silentwings , that is like saying "reimplement alt/shift/ctrl build modifier with widgets". It not need to be removed if it was working before. |
Google_Frog (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:54 |
You do realize that Big Bertha doesn't actually have commandfire=true? |
Google_Frog (reporter) 2013-10-15 18:58 |
Guess what! If you give Big Bertha weapon commandFire=true in 94.1.1-1353 then it does exactly what you want! I would even go so far to say that commandFire has always done this and the fact that every single unit lost orders regardless of them firing in 91.0 was a bug and in no way related to what you want. TLDR: No Change Required. |
Kloot (developer) 2013-10-15 19:07 |
sigh |
msafwan (reporter) 2013-10-16 06:32 Last edited: 2013-10-16 09:09 |
Kloot & Google_Frog the feature was really removed. shift+attack did EXACTLY SAME thing as alt+attack for all commandFire=true unit & commandFire=false unit (in Spring 92 and later). In other word, alt+attack modifier was removed and thus forcing alt it to become redundant. I understand that commandFire=true is already used for nukes even in Spring91, but alt+attack was an attack modifier for regular unit. We lost it. ----------------------------- After testing Spring 89 & Spring 91, the "bug" in Spring 91 is probably meant to skip blocked target (like trees and terrain), however it also skip target when weapon is reloading thus it become a bug. related: http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4070 Also, line_attack with commandFire=true for rapid firing unit (like armdeva.lua in ZK) can produce sweeping minigun behaviour. Would be cool if alt modifier can make it continue shooting if button is pressed (currently alt modifier with commandFire=true didn't do anything special in Spring 89 & 91) |
msafwan (reporter) 2013-10-16 09:55 Last edited: 2013-10-16 10:22 |
idk now... maybe this bug not important after all... we can only see this stuff when having customformation widget, so... maybe its widget problem.(because alt+shift+attack cannot do same stuff as line attack which is provided by customformation) |
Kloot (developer) 2013-10-16 11:38 |
ENOUGH |
msafwan (reporter) 2013-11-30 14:03 |
I reopened this report as documentation that bug was never fixed and just ignored. |
Google_Frog (reporter) 2013-11-30 14:37 |
You reopened a report which was certainly not reporting a bug. As said earlier your so called bug is actually caused by a bug in 91.0 which was later fixed. You will have to provide some good evidence for reopening this report and I don't think any such evidence exists. |
silentwings (reporter) 2013-11-30 15:11 Last edited: 2013-11-30 15:17 |
"your so called bug is actually caused by a bug in 91.0 which was later fixed" - this. |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-15 18:00 | msafwan | New Issue | |
2013-10-15 18:01 | msafwan | Tag Attached: unit ai | |
2013-10-15 18:02 | msafwan | Tag Attached: attack modifier | |
2013-10-15 18:09 | msafwan | Note Added: 0011787 | |
2013-10-15 18:24 | silentwings | Note Added: 0011788 | |
2013-10-15 18:26 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011787 | View Revisions |
2013-10-15 18:28 | Google_Frog | Note Added: 0011789 | |
2013-10-15 18:32 | msafwan | Note Added: 0011790 | |
2013-10-15 18:33 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011790 | View Revisions |
2013-10-15 18:36 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011790 | View Revisions |
2013-10-15 18:37 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011790 | View Revisions |
2013-10-15 18:41 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011790 | View Revisions |
2013-10-15 18:54 | Google_Frog | Note Added: 0011791 | |
2013-10-15 18:58 | Google_Frog | Note Added: 0011792 | |
2013-10-15 19:07 | Kloot | Note Added: 0011793 | |
2013-10-15 19:07 | Kloot | Status | new => closed |
2013-10-15 19:07 | Kloot | Assigned To | => Kloot |
2013-10-15 19:07 | Kloot | Resolution | open => no change required |
2013-10-16 06:32 | msafwan | Note Added: 0011805 | |
2013-10-16 06:32 | msafwan | Status | closed => feedback |
2013-10-16 06:32 | msafwan | Resolution | no change required => reopened |
2013-10-16 06:34 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 06:36 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 06:39 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 06:40 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 06:41 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:20 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:21 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:22 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:27 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:29 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 07:29 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 09:09 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011805 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 09:55 | msafwan | Note Added: 0011807 | |
2013-10-16 09:55 | msafwan | Status | feedback => assigned |
2013-10-16 10:00 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011807 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 10:21 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011807 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 10:22 | msafwan | Note Edited: 0011807 | View Revisions |
2013-10-16 11:38 | Kloot | Note Added: 0011809 | |
2013-10-16 11:38 | Kloot | Status | assigned => closed |
2013-10-16 11:38 | Kloot | Resolution | reopened => no change required |
2013-11-30 14:03 | msafwan | Note Added: 0012271 | |
2013-11-30 14:03 | msafwan | Status | closed => feedback |
2013-11-30 14:03 | msafwan | Resolution | no change required => reopened |
2013-11-30 14:37 | Google_Frog | Note Added: 0012272 | |
2013-11-30 15:11 | silentwings | Note Added: 0012274 | |
2013-11-30 15:17 | silentwings | Note Edited: 0012274 | View Revisions |
2013-11-30 15:32 | Kloot | Status | feedback => closed |
2013-11-30 15:32 | Kloot | Resolution | reopened => no change required |