| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002724 | Spring engine | General | public | 2011-11-10 14:37 | 2011-11-10 18:06 | ||||
| Reporter | user744 | ||||||||
| Assigned To | Kloot | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Product Version | 83.0 | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 84.0 | |||||||
| Summary | 0002724: modrules.lua: negative constructionDecaySpeed has funny results | ||||||||
| Description | when setting a negative constructionDecaySpeed, nanoframes will automagically complete themself once the builder stops/moves away. (protoss style) problem is, the health of the unit goes over 9000 and the unit seems to never actually finish (eg factories constructed in such way will not start building units) noticed during http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=14&p=504668 (has mod attached) | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Checked infolog.txt for Errors | |||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
| Notes |
|
|
Kloot (developer) 2011-11-10 18:06 |
the code involved is not designed with the idea that constructionDecaySpeed might also be negative. at first glance though supporting Protoss-style construction would be easy enough, but I'm going to play it safe with 84.0 in mind and say "Lua it". |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-10 14:37 |
|
New Issue | |
| 2011-11-10 18:06 | Kloot | Note Added: 0007575 | |
| 2011-11-10 18:06 | Kloot | Status | new => resolved |
| 2011-11-10 18:06 | Kloot | Fixed in Version | => 84.0 |
| 2011-11-10 18:06 | Kloot | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2011-11-10 18:06 | Kloot | Assigned To | => Kloot |
| Issue History |