View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000242Spring engineGeneralpublic2007-01-15 06:39
ReporterNOiZE Assigned ToILMTitan  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Summary0000242: reclaimable in combination with industrucible Feature TDF tags don't work properly
DescriptionIf reclaimable=0; it can still be reclaimed

however if indestructible=1; also is defined then it can't be reclaimed or destroyed.

But if you have:
indestructible=1; and reclaimable=1; defined. Then it should be industructible but reclaimable, but you can't reclaim it.

TagsNo tags attached.
Checked infolog.txt for Errors

Activities

NOiZE

2006-07-10 19:26

reporter   ~0000290

So basicly the "reclaimable=;" tag doesn't work

TheBlasphemer

2006-08-04 02:41

reporter   ~0000310

Created a patch and sent it to the mailinglist.
Now let's hope it's good enough to get accepted :P

ILMTitan

2007-01-15 04:54

reporter   ~0000560

Assigning to myself. Was that patch ever committed? I does not look like it. Was it just a change in CBuilder::SetReclaimTarget(CSolidObject* target)? If so, I can fix it myself.

ILMTitan

2007-01-15 06:39

reporter   ~0000561

Should be fixed in revision 3178. Can I get either confirmation that it works, or at least a map to test it on?

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2006-07-09 12:21 NOiZE New Issue
2006-07-09 12:38 NOiZE Summary reclaimable in combination Feature TDF tags don't work properly => reclaimable in combination with industrucible Feature TDF tags don't work properly
2006-07-10 19:26 NOiZE Note Added: 0000290
2006-08-04 02:41 TheBlasphemer Note Added: 0000310
2007-01-15 04:54 ILMTitan Status new => assigned
2007-01-15 04:54 ILMTitan Assigned To => ILMTitan
2007-01-15 04:54 ILMTitan Note Added: 0000560
2007-01-15 06:39 ILMTitan Status assigned => resolved
2007-01-15 06:39 ILMTitan Resolution open => fixed
2007-01-15 06:39 ILMTitan Note Added: 0000561