2025-07-18 21:48 CEST

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000406Spring engineGeneralpublic2012-06-03 00:39
ReporterP3374H 
Assigned TojK 
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
StatusresolvedResolutionfixed 
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0000406: Nanoframe construction progress does not decline as they are attacked.
DescriptionIn ota, when a frame was attacked, its progress would go down as well as its health - while in spring, it just lowers the hp.

This should probably be a mod-defined choice between the current behaviour and the ota behaviour.
TagsNo tags attached.
Checked infolog.txt for Errors
Attached Files

-Relationships
+Relationships

-Notes

~0001245

tvo (reporter)

this is a feature request IMHO

~0001247

Pendrokar (reporter)

I think that has been in a long time! But it stinks that resources are lost if nanoframe is destroyed and if it would be destroyed after completion there's at least some wreckage of metal left!

~0001248

patmo98 (reporter)

> In ota, when a frame was attacked, its progress would go down as well as its health - while in spring, it just lowers the hp.

How sure are you? I'm almost sure that attacking a unit that is being built in OTA will not change construction progress. If you are also sure, I can check.

~0001299

ILMTitan (reporter)

I do believe this was the way it worked in TA. I can not recall a single instance in which I completed a building and it was already damaged in OTA.

~0001301

KDR_11k (reporter)

Should be mod defined and not default behaviour if it gets added.

~0001305

patmo98 (reporter)

I know that I have finished a Krogoth at something other than full health after it got adv bombed.

~0008732

jK (developer)

<[S44]FLOZi> guess i'll ahve to bug [LCC]jK: This mantis can be closed, luable for ages
+Notes

-Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2007-01-27 16:38 P3374H New Issue
2007-09-11 12:54 tvo Note Added: 0001245
2007-09-11 12:54 tvo Severity minor => feature
2007-09-11 18:50 Pendrokar Note Added: 0001247
2007-09-11 19:19 patmo98 Note Added: 0001248
2007-09-24 07:02 ILMTitan Note Added: 0001299
2007-09-24 10:05 KDR_11k Note Added: 0001301
2007-09-24 18:30 patmo98 Note Added: 0001305
2012-06-03 00:39 jK Note Added: 0008732
2012-06-03 00:39 jK Status new => resolved
2012-06-03 00:39 jK Resolution open => fixed
2012-06-03 00:39 jK Assigned To => jK
+Issue History